User talk:Enchantingbreeze17

January 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Origin of the Serbs has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Origin of the Serbs was changed by Enchantingbreeze17 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.857677 on 2014-01-24T10:35:50+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:35, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Skanderbeg with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. DVdm (talk) 10:40, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Souliotes with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. DVdm (talk) 10:56, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Souliotes with this edit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. DVdm (talk) 11:00, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Yunshui 雲 &zwj; 水  11:05, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Yunshui stop accusing me of vandalism when you don't even know what my intentions are in the first place. removing certain content that is either fraudulant or not true is not vandalism


 * I took another look at your edits, to be certain that I wasn't mistaken - but you were blanking apparently legitimate, sourced information without explanation, and that is regarded as vandalism here. Yunshui 雲 &zwj; 水  11:33, 24 January 2014 (UTC)