User talk:Encyclops

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

And one request. It is good to use edit summaries when you contribute. You've been doing that lately and that is much appreciated. Enjoy! Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 18:35, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

Notational and Usage Conventions
Hello. Your recent edits to log-normal distribution prompt two tips.


 * (1) Notice the difference between these:


 * $$(\frac{a}{b})$$


 * $$\left(\frac{a}{b}\right)$$


 * Allowing the parentheses to have the right size, as in the second case, is customary.


 * (2) "Partial expectation", with a lower-case initial "e", is correct Wikipedia style; capitalizing the "e" is not.

Michael Hardy 01:12, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

Invitation
Hi! You may be interested in following the discussions on the talk pages of WikiProject Physics and WikiProject Mathematics. If so, please think of putting yourself on the participants list for the projects as well. linas 03:52, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

See also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Mathematics/Current_activity

People in systems and control
Hi, just wanted to compliment you on improving the People in systems and control article. Good job. Now the article makes more sense then when I first encountered it. Garion96 (talk) 01:42, 29 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Thank you! Encyclops 03:36, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

apologies
Hi. It seems I jumped the gun by tagging your article with the context template. I only realized later your "more to come" edit sumary. Feel free to remove it (although I still believe that it could have a bit more context!) Pascal.Tesson 19:36, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

Condensing bios
Good work on the bios in People in systems and control. Currently, the historical figures are presented as a dense list, and it would be nice to see the active researchers bios condensed as well. It seems odd/absurd to be so verbal about the current researchers when the historical figures where groundbreaking, and the active researchers "just" "wrote a few books". I feel it would be good to condense the bios. I will gladly do so, given the go ahead. The goal would be to have them down to 1 line of text in most browsers/resolutions, like the historical figures. Agree/Disagree? jugander (t) 17:34, 8 August 2006 (UTC)


 * OK. But I am worried about shortening it too much. It seems to me the word "professor" could be omitted in each case, but I would leave the name of the university, for example.  In the beginning each person had literally just the name and it was difficult for the causal reader to have any idea who these people were and why they are mentioned.  Ultimately though, I agree with you. Encyclops 17:51, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Kolmogorov equations
Thanks of the clear up on those! jugander (t) 06:11, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Hamiltonian
At the end of the article on Hamiltonian (control theory), you mention that in discrete time the costate variables have to be considered a timestep ahead of the state variables. It's not particularly clear why this is - could it be explained quickly, or referenced? Helmut Ahab 00:35, 7 September 2006 (UTC)


 * It is a notational convention, not a deep result. I have added a small explanation. Encyclops 00:25, 8 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks for that. 128.250.102.134 00:49, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Images listed for deletion
Some of your images or media files have been listed for deletion. Please see Images and media for deletion if you are interested in preserving them. Thank you. Pekaje 20:06, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Statistical Arbitrage
In my humble opinion, Statistical arbitrage is more within the scope of something like WP:WikiProject Finance than WP:WikiProject Statistics. It is a topic in Finance (or Mathematical Finance) having some statistical aspects, rather than a mainstream Statistics topic. Encyclops (talk) 17:58, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
 * See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Statistics. My thought was that Statistical arbitrage did involve some statistical thinking in setting up the method. At present WikiProject Statistics is trying to bring all articles on statistics topics into the list of statistical topics to provide a basis for further progress. You might want to look at the project page and consider joining. Melcombe (talk) 18:11, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

farkas
Yes of course it should - that was a typo by me - thanks for noticing! However on a sidenote the lemma seems to be stipulated very differently in different texts... I've learnt it by using the Ax = b and the transponate in the alternative which i think is more logical. The typo with the $$\geq / \leq$$ came up when i changed them around because i found one source also using convex analysis style markings for that, but i think normals are correct here though. But thanks for notcing that. Gillis (talk) 14:25, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for StatArb article
Not reading JofF and rest of fin lit on a regular basis, would like to thank you for drawing attention to Khandani and Lo (2007) article. Clears up some latent questions. Any insider rumours on the particular strategy (CDOs?) that brought the Aug 2007 event? 212.188.109.216 (talk) 21:12, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

TeX issue
Hello. Your edits to Fenchel's duality theorem prompt this comment. Please notice this difference&mdash;in particular in the positions of the subscripts on "min" and "max":
 * $$\mathrm{min}_x ( f(x)-g(x) ) = \mathrm{max}_p ( g^\star(p)-f^\star(p)). \, $$
 * $$\min_x ( f(x)-g(x) ) = \max_p ( g^\star(p)-f^\star(p)). \,$$
 * $$\min_x ( f(x)-g(x) ) = \max_p ( g^\star(p)-f^\star(p)). \,$$
 * $$\min_x ( f(x)-g(x) ) = \max_p ( g^\star(p)-f^\star(p)). \,$$

The latter uses \min_x and \max_p rather than \mathrm{min}_x and \mathrm{max}_p and is standard usage. Using the standard operator names rather than \mathrm not only affects the position of the subscripts but also in some cases affects spacing between "min" or "max" and the things that precede and follow them. Also, I think when "min" or "max" appears in a subscript or superscript, the standard operator name is made to assume the appropriate sizes&mdash;that's built into the software. Michael Hardy (talk) 14:39, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia conventions
This edit goes against standard Wikipedia conventions and makes an exception of this one case. I've moved it back. Michael Hardy (talk) 14:44, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Cramer's paradox
Hi, Encyclops, whoever you are. Since User:Charles Matthews hasn't bugged you on this it falls to me to do so. You've been sitting on your very nice piece about Cramer's paradox for ten months now, please elevate it to an article ASAP. --Vaughan Pratt (talk) 05:48, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Desarguesian plane
Hi Encyclops -- you started out the Desarguesian plane article with "In finite geometry". In the meantime, it's been categorized under projective geometry, and your reference to non-Desarguesian finite geometries has been replaced by a reference to non-Desarguesian planes, with the example of the Moulton plane, which, if I understand the term correctly, is not a finite geometry. Am I right in concluding that the article should start out with "In projective geometry" instead? Joriki (talk) 11:39, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 19:42, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dante C. Youla


The article Dante C. Youla has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Eeekster (talk) 00:52, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Another Bellman winner
OK.

File permission problem with File:JuergenStark01.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:JuergenStark01.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 00:42, 7 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks for letting me know. Encyclops (talk) 17:14, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Hello
it's me, Freddy! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.30.107.177 (talk) 22:11, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:03, 23 November 2015 (UTC)