User talk:EndlessUnknown

Disambiguation link notification for January 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Leopard 2
 * added links pointing to Hughes and Maneuver


 * MBT-70
 * added a link pointing to M73

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited FLW remote weapon station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FFG. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:10, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Lynx
Hi EndlessUnknown,

I'm not a great fan of random deletion of updates so always try to explain my reasoning for anything even remotely contentious! And so... re your update to Lynx. I have always thought the hull looked quite Marder-like but I was at the press briefing when it was unveiled at Eurosatory and Rheinmetall's Ben Hudson ( https://www.linkedin.com/in/ben-hudson-a14171a ) actually stated it was not based on Marder. I don't actually have that on tape as such, but consider it good enough. I did a deep Google to see what 'rumours' the web turned up, but found little more than a strand of forum nonsense by an ill-informed. Happy to talk more if you know more.--Wolpat (talk) 07:38, 7 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Rheinmetall will tell you that is a new vehicle, because they are interested in marketing and selling the Lynx. The hull of the Lynx is however based on the Marder IFV. The frontal armour layout is identical - this includes the location of the bolts to hold the armour and the exact shape of the engine cover. The overlapping roof armour at the dismount comparment(introduced on the Marder 1A3) can be found on the dismount compartment of the Lynx. The turret ring of the Marder proturdes into the glacis armour, a distinctive design feature of the Marder - it is the same on the Lynx. The location of the driver's hatch is also identical. Spacing and type of the roadwheels, ground clearance, the location of the rear exhausts and many more feautres of the Lynx are identical to the Marder hull.
 * Rheinmetall has bought several hundred ex-Bundeswehr Marder IFVs and has been trying to sell them. The Marder APC presented at Eurosatory 2012 already featured the same type of hull side armour as the Lynx. The Marder CCV was first fitted with a LANCE turret (the RC version, as this wasn't meant for Australia).
 * The Rheinmetall employees pretend that the Lynx is a new vehicle, because it got a new engine, a new turret, a new FCS, a new gun, new tracks, new side armour, a new engine, etc. Saying "this a 30 years old design with new components added to it" doesn't really boost sales. --11:15, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
 * You are for sure correct with those similarities. It will be interesting to see what the future holds. Maybe a version based on refurbished Marder, and maybe a new-build version? Whatever happens, Australia will never buy a rebuilt Marder as part of Land 400, and I can't see Rheinmetall being dim enough to even try and offer them one! On a separate point, when/if you add the FLW500 to the FLW remote weapon station page, if required I have a great shot from Eurosatory this year. Drop me a message if you want it as the FLW isn't something I'd normally look at.--Wolpat (talk) 08:43, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

May 2019
Hello, EndlessUnknown, I saw that you made a draft for a new article at User:EndlessUnknown/Boxer. Short term hosting of potentially valid articles and other reasonable content under development or in active use is usually acceptable. But in this case, you haven't edited your draft for a long time. If you wish to improve the draft yourself, please do. Otherwise, you may consider donating it to WikiProject Abandoned Drafts (a participant can help). Thank you. GretLomborg (talk) 18:23, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

June 2019
Hello, EndlessUnknown, I saw that you made a draft for a new article at User:EndlessUnknown/sandbox. Short term hosting of potentially valid articles and other reasonable content under development or in active use is usually acceptable. But in this case, you haven't edited your draft for a long time. If you wish to improve the draft yourself, please do. Otherwise, you may consider donating it to WikiProject Abandoned Drafts (a participant can help). ''Seems like there's material in your draft that could be merged into Composite armour. '' GretLomborg (talk) 20:13, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 28 November 2023 (UTC)