User talk:Endless 01

Your submission at Articles for creation: Grenville's Planet (July 17)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Idoghor Melody was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Grenville's Planet and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Grenville's Planet, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Grenville%27s_Planet Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Idoghor_Melody&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Grenville%27s_Planet reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 Comr Melody Idoghor  (talk)  13:50, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gone to See the River Man (July 18)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gone to See the River Man and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Gone to See the River Man, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Gone_to_See_the_River_Man Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Asilvering&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Gone_to_See_the_River_Man reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

asilvering (talk) 04:28, 18 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi. I disagree with the notability verdict mostly on the grounds that the book, while not as famous to be reviewed by, let's say Stephen King or The New York Times, it still produced an impact during 2020 and was listed on various less-known blogs and review sites of mostly underground scene. From what I've understand about notability (which, in my opinion, is quite confusing to follow 100% through), is that if it has appeared it other sources, like newspapers, magazines, reviews or other, it is notable enough. While not considered to be mainstream, I still believe it to be worthy of an article. Obscurity does not mean a lack of notability, according to this.
 * I still consider the sources good enough to be a solid base, but I guess since I'm quite knew to this, perhaps it flew over my mind what is actually looked for, regarding sources or references. So, if the word is final, I guess I can't do much.
 * Thanks for reading and your time. - Endless 01 (talk) 08:32, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Grenville's Planet
Hello, Endless 01. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Grenville's Planet, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 17 December 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Gone to See the River Man
Hello, Endless 01. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gone to See the River Man, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Grenville's Planet


Hello, Endless 01. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Grenville's Planet".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 13:52, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Gone to See the River Man


Hello, Endless 01. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Gone to See the River Man".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 15:37, 13 February 2023 (UTC)