User talk:Endogenous -i

Please leave a message.

comment

 * Dear Endogenous, please don't erase well sourced info from Upper St. Clair High School. It is considered as vandalism. If you want to erase any major part of an article, you should post an explanation on the talk page of the article. Have a nice day. AdjustShift (talk) 13:52, 13 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Dear AdjustShift, deletion of unencyclopedic gossip blogging, is not considered vandalism, you are wrong and remiss. The content was deleted with cause, based on reason and logic, in comport with multiple wikipedia policies, and explained over 4 months ago in the talk page!  Additionally, it was in fact NOT well sourced, some is entirely unsourced, some unverifyable as a matter of law, and the remainder is misrepresentation or allegatiosn later proven false.  Further, sourcing does not equal relevance, especially for such thin and encyclopedic irrelevant current events gossip. The material was edited and not preserved due to irrelevance.
 * "when you wonder what should or should not be in an article, ask yourself what a reader would expect to find under the same heading in an Encyclopedia."... NOT in a Gossip/News Current Events Blog!

Tip
Hello. I can't help but notice this endless edit-warring as the page is on my watchlist due to real vandals. My advice - edit the content. Trim it back slowly and consolidate it, but don't remove it entirely. Large-scale removals just scare everybody. Re-read between the lines at WP:UNDUE. -- zzuuzz (talk) 13:41, 13 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks zzuuzz. Real vandalism is I am sure a problem for virtually all schools (soo many kids), hovever in this case the problem is occuring because of repetitive Bad Faith reversion of my edits both small and large. I have explained my point and resasoning in detail to remove Unencyclopedic current events gossip (which itself is a form of vandalism).  Hopefylly logic and cooler heads will prevail and we will be left with a properly encyclopedic article.


 * "I have explained my point and resasoning in detail". No, you haven't. Happy New Year. Ewen (talk) 23:36, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

USC
Hi there. I like your edit which was, unfortunately reverted Looks like you are having a little trouble with one of my, uh, er, well, you'll figure it out. ;-)ObserverNY (talk) 22:00, 3 October 2009 (UTC)ObserverNY