User talk:Enemies within

Welcome
Hi, Enemies within. This is NOT some automated message...it's from a real person. You can talk to me right now. Welcome to Wikipedia! I noticed you've just joined, and wanted to give you a few tips to get you started. If you have any questions, please talk to us. The tips below should help you to get started. Best of luck!  Chzz  ►  06:52, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

May 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Until It Sleeps 23:34, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Brown Brothers Harriman & Co.. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you.  Tide  rolls  20:07, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Brown Brothers Harriman & Co.. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing.  Tide  rolls  20:09, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Brown Brothers Harriman & Co.. ukexpat (talk) 20:12, 7 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your message on my talk page. I am afraid that your diatribe against Brown Brothers Harriman was nothing more than that, an unencyclopedic rant and your "reference" was merely to the "The National Archives and Library of Congress" with no specificity. If you believe that the article should deal with these issues, please discuss on the article's talk page and provide specific, detailed references from reliable sources that support your points, so that an attempt can be made to reach consensus. I remind you that the onus is on you to provide references supporting the points you are trying to make. Without them, and even with them if done in the wrong way, you are merely pushing a non-neutral point of view. Thank you. – ukexpat (talk) 13:45, 8 May 2009 (UTC)