User talk:Enfermero

Carpenters
Not sure if I ever replied anywhere - apologies, I suspect I didn't. Happy to advise on process, but I have no dog in this one so I'm not going to 'vote'. In any event that would reduce my ability to facilitate the process since I would no longer be neutral. --AndrewHowse (talk) 12:47, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Okay, I understand. I may have been a little upset. Enfermero (talk) 05:47, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Test Section
test removed. Enfermero (talk) 17:14, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Edit summary
You may want to use something other than "warning tags" when tagging articles. The tags you are placing are not warnings, but rather notes indicating areas of improvement. Perhaps something like "tagging for improvement" would be better? ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjoe 04:15, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
 * You are right, it does seem more 'agressive' than 'maintenance templates.' You are not the first to mention this. I will use 'maintenance templates' instead.Enfermero (talk) 19:47, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Blanc de chine
Please see discussion there. Marshall46 (talk) 09:06, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I really try, but I did poorly of this one. Enfermero (talk) 19:47, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

User_talk:Iwanafish
Please be careful not to insert policy pages into user talk pages by using templates; it screws up the policy categories. (Watching) - Dank (push to talk) 19:24, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for the information. I am back from a work vacation overseas. Enfermero (talk) 20:28, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

You're being discussed ...
... and promoted to sysop :)) at Content_noticeboard. NVO (talk) 05:55, 15 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Oh, my! I got promoted at work and now I get a "promotion" from Iwanafish. Funny!  Oh, I wish I had more time but to many responsibilities and more to come!  I am engaged to a very special person. I hope things will settle down and I can spend more time on Wikipedia. Enfermero (talk) 17:26, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Morningtown Ride
I have contributed with references on the Morningtown Ride article and added some information. Best wishes! Mbakkel2 31. jan 2010 kl. 11:43 (CET)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)