User talk:Engcilia25/sandbox

It looks like you have done a lot of good work for this article already! The sources and bibliographies you are adding look great. There definitely appear to be many gaps in citations throughout the article where there should be - and it looks like you are tackling this! One thing that I noticed that could be a good place to do some work, is there are 2 phrases in the original article that are red and underlined, meaning they do not link to anything else on Wikipedia. For example, in the first paragraph the word nanophthalamos is not linked to anything, so this could be a place for you to try and find a wikipedia article relating to that to link it to! Additionally, the diagnosis and treatment sections in the original article are lacking (or, completely blank). I see you added some of this to your sandbox, which is great! These are definitely sections that need some significant work for this article. Overall, great job!