User talk:EngiZe

Proposed deletion of Travis Cloyd


The article Travis Cloyd has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable individual lacking in-depth, non-trivial support. References are single line entries or do not mention article subject."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. red dogsix (talk) 23:56, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Template:Pernilla Wahlgren
Do you mind to finish off Template:Pernilla Wahlgren ASAP? It is still partly in Swedish... The Banner talk 11:18, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Did not notice. Sorry about that. I will set to finish it now. Thanks for the memo --EngiZe (talk) 17:44, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Proposed Deletion of erevmax
Hi

Erevmax is a product company with base in Kolkata and Bangalore, and sales presence in Europe, America and Latam. Why do you wnat to delete the page which is totally objective, without any kind of promotional material — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chhuti (talk • contribs) 06:02, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Travis Cloyd for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Travis Cloyd is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Travis Cloyd until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. red dogsix (talk) 22:58, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Ankit Prasad
Hello

Please review it again and help me improve the page so it remain undeleted. Bullus 17:54, 24 August 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bullus (talk • contribs)

Care with deletion nominations
I have declined your nomination of the article Curran Nault for speedy deletion as a hoax, because half a minute's Google search produced a very large number of sources showing that the article was not a hoax at all. I don't know why you thought it was, but short of articles making absurd claims such as that someone flew to the moon under their own power or that they became president of France at the age of four, one should always do some basic checking before tagging a page for such deletion. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:18, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
 * , I saw the mistake as soon as I made the nomination. I will be more careful with future nominations. Thank you for the memo and so sorry for the trouble. --EngiZe (talk) 20:21, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Rentier (talk) 00:30, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Recall


The article The Recall has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Minor film with box office $19,566 unlikely to meet WP:NFILM"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ☆ Bri (talk) 01:44, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

August 2017
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. MER-C 02:50, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

No unblock request will be considered without a list of ALL paid edits in accordance with Wikipedia's Terms of Use. That said, I strongly oppose unblocking you as you have engaged in the unscrupulous, deceptive and morally bankrupt practice of undermining this volunteer curated encyclopedia for financial gain. MER-C 02:58, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Well said.--SamHolt6 (talk) 03:47, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Cannabis in Arizona
Template:Cannabis in Arizona has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 10:01, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Price to Win


A tag has been placed on Price to Win, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ☆ Bri (talk) 17:57, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Airtame device.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Airtame device.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:09, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Eybna logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Eybna logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:19, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Corix Bioscience logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Corix Bioscience logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:12, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Secs&#38;Execs logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Secs&. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Airtame for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Airtame is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Airtame until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 17:50, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Airtame


A tag has been placed on Airtame, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:09, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Airtame logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Airtame logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:01, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Tello Films logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Tello Films logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:03, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Capture management


The article Capture management has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "This article does not meet Wikipedia's guidelines for inclusion in the encyclopedia, specifically the general notability guideline and WP:NEO & WP:DICTDEF guidelines."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &Alpha; Guy into Books &trade; &sect; ( Message ) -  08:03, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Draft:Frister & Rossmann concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Frister & Rossmann, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Draft:Frister & Rossmann
Draft:Frister & Rossmann, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Frister & Rossmann and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Frister & Rossmann during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. MT TrainDiscuss 17:04, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Mattress retailers of India


A tag has been placed on Category:Mattress retailers of India requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:38, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Mattress retailers of Austria


A tag has been placed on Category:Mattress retailers of Austria indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 15:34, 21 August 2021 (UTC)