User talk:EngiZe/Archive1

CSD categorization
Hey EngiZe, thank you for your help in examining new pages. I just want to let you know that I changed your speedy deletion category on Weak667 from G1 to A3. Please take a look at WP:Speedy for all the various CSD categories. G1 (patent nonsense) would be something like eafgeagasdegl;kjee. That wasn't patent nonsense. Even though it still qualifies for speedy deletion it is important to categorize them correctly so admins can quickly examine and confirm the deletion. If you have any questions please feel free to let me know. --Majora (talk) 20:21, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for your contribution on editting works
Thanks for your contribution on editting works.

Might in the future Loowi is important enough to be enrolled in Wikipedia.

Happy New Year!

EduToys 11:37, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite
Hi. The WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 05:59, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of CannaTech


A tag has been placed on CannaTech requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organized event (tour, function, meeting, party, etc.), but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. red dogsix (talk) 20:07, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of CannaTech


The article CannaTech has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable event lacking non-trivial support.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. red dogsix (talk) 20:57, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Please stop adding redundant categories
Cannabis in Germany is under Category:Cannabis in Germany which is under Category:Cannabis by country. I believe what you're doing is non-standard, so please stop doing it and ask on the Talk page first. Goonsquad LCpl Mulvaney (talk) 07:43, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
 * , now I see it. Sorry, I will reverse it. --EngiZe (talk) 07:46, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Frister & Rossmann moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Frister & Rossmann, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. —  InsertCleverPhraseHere  19:15, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
 * I created it to fill the "red link" in "Template:Sewing", having in mind that it needs to be referenced. However, I will respect you decision and put the sources while in draft namespace. For some reason, there is not much about the company, although it is a world-class producer of sewing machines. I will manage somehow. Thank you for the insight. --EngiZe (talk) 19:20, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Frister & Rossmann has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Frister & Rossmann. Thanks! SwisterTwister  talk  18:46, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Ben Weeks for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ben Weeks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ben Weeks until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. D ARTH B OTTO talk • cont 02:37, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Frister & Rossmann (August 7)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Frister & Rossmann and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 15:33, 7 August 2017 (UTC)