User talk:Engineer Seijas

Welcome!

Hello, Engineer Seijas, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Preservation of organs to transplant functioning in normothermia, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Zachlipton (talk) 00:09, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Preservation of organs to transplant functioning in normothermia


A tag has been placed on Preservation of organs to transplant functioning in normothermia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Zachlipton (talk) 00:09, 15 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Dear Sirs: The address “http://transpjgsengl.blogspot.com/” is my own blog, which contains a fuller explanation of the article "Preservation of organs to transplant functioning in normothermia ": therefore, this article is not a copyright infringement. You can see that in my blog "http://transpjgsengl.blogspot.com/"and in the article mentioned, the copyright records are the same. Thank you. Engineer Seijas (talk) 01:30, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Your blog does not contain any copyright notice so we must treat it as "all rights reserved". But in fact that is irrelevant. I used copyvio as a shortcut. The real deletion reason was original research. &mdash; RHaworth 01:45, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

Dear Sirs: At the bottom of my blog "http://transpjgsengl.blogspot.com/" figure: “Registered DNDA: 147108 (Jun/1989); 688695 (Jul/1996); 01706 (Jul/1999); 703263 (Oct/2008)”, where DNDA means "National Directorate of Copyright" in Spanish. I understand that rejection is due to not having put in my blog the word "copyright" in English, according to the usual. Perhaps by not knowing English better I do not understand if there are other reasons for rejecting my article (my native language is Spanish). Thank you very much. Engineer Seijas (talk) 15:40, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Hi there. The lack of the word "copyright" was the problem. Rather, we had no idea that you owned the copyright to the text you were contributing. However, as RHaworth said above, copyright was not the primary concern here. The real problem is that your article constituted original research, which isn't allowed on Wikipedia by our policies. I encourage you to read them. Furthermore, it was completely unreferenced; articles on Wikipedia need to cite their sources. Also, you might want to know that there are hundreds of Wikipedias in different languages, so you might be more comfortable in the Spanish Wikipedia community if you prefer. Feel free to let me know if you have any questions. Zachlipton (talk) 23:18, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your interest. Engineer Seijas (talk) 16:31, 18 January 2011 (UTC)