User talk:Englishprofessor6T9

Speedy deletion nomination of Rooshk
Hello Englishprofessor6T9,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Rooshk for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. MB298 (talk) 19:14, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Do not create, add, maintain, insert, or restore hoaxes on Wikipedia, such as you did with the article Rooshk. Usually, hoaxes will be caught and marked for deletion shortly after they are created. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia – and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. └ UkPaolo/talk┐ 20:11, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rooshk


A tag has been placed on Rooshk requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 331dot (talk) 20:12, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

January 2016
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at Rooshk, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. 331dot (talk) 20:13, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rooshk


A tag has been placed on Rooshk requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 331dot (talk) 20:16, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

January 2016
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you create an inappropriate page, as you did at Rooshk. 331dot (talk) 20:16, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. └ UkPaolo/talk┐ 20:18, 4 January 2016 (UTC)