User talk:Engranaje

Unsourced additions
Following our discussion, please don't make unsourced additions to the list! Thanks. Chiswick Chap (talk) 03:46, 22 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Why unsourced? They are internal links to pages which have their own references. Please, make your point clear Engranaje (talk) 03:57, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
 * WP:V says: "any material whose verifiability has been challenged or is likely to be challenged, must include an inline citation that directly supports the material"
 * Arguing that there's a source on some other page doesn't help much. It's not inline and it's missing the point of verifiability. With an inline citation, the source is right there next to the disputed content. Also, all too often, people say that there's a source elsewhere which, in reality, either doesn't exist or doesn't support the disputed content; by providing an inline source you remove the possibility that others would unreasonably suspect you of evading WP:V. bobrayner (talk) 13:09, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Engranaje, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! bobrayner (talk) 21:48, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

August 2013
Hello, I'm Mark Arsten. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Christopher Wickham, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:34, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

October 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=575904646 your edit] to Phoenix (mythology) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:46, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Christian_art|halo]] and roses, detail of pavement mosaic c. 275 CE, Daphne; now Antakya in Turkey]

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)