User talk:Enigmaman/Archives/2011

Well...
Hello there. Not sure if this is a permanent visit or not. Doubt it. Scarian Call me Pat!  21:18, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Bah. Prot. please? Scarian  Call me Pat!  20:35, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

I have a small amount to annoy you with: This fellow needs a genre warring warning. I have forgotten the template name. This guy, too. Some of their edits aren't so bad but the majority are just PoV. I've added them to UV's page. Thanks, man. Scarian Call me Pat!  09:54, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
 * , 2, 3 and 4 work. They're linked in Twinkle as well, the very bottom option under Warning reason, "Frequent or mass changes to genres without consensus or references". -- King Öomie  17:11, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
 * And the second IP Scarian linked is a sock of the guy you blocked a few months back, E-man, the guy who had a mad-on for removing post-grunge from the universe. -- King Öomie 17:14, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
 * OK, I'll take care of it.  Enigma msg  14:43, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Heh, I don't even use any programmes any more. But thanks and thanks, guys. Scarian  Call me Pat!  08:30, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

Dave G needs another prot please! Ta! Scarian Call me Pat!  15:29, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

If you missed it
I acknowledge that it was wrong and inappropriate of me to open an enforcement right after, --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 18:10, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Part of the battleground mentality applies not only to article editing, but also to filing AEs constantly.  Enigma msg  23:15, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Good article reassessment
An article that you have been involved in editing, E-mail Surveillance has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments good article reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Fences &amp;  Windows  17:45, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

re
I'm gonna respond here so not to bother NW any more.

Both the AE and ANI thread happened half a year ago, I cant remember everything that happened there, but what was said there doesn't contradict that when I read JJGs comments I didn't think his name was an issue for him. The information I sent back then was about the other user Eric1985 and had nothing to do with Jiujitsuguy and the circumstances and information was not the same either, I only saw JJGs comments afterwards. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 06:23, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Both of those threads, among others you were aware of, talk about the outing issue. Additionally, you referenced the article at least one other time, not linking to it, presumably because you knew it would be considered outing. The same for Nableezy. How am I supposed to believe now that you and Nableezy both "innocently" linked to it, considering your respective pasts?  Enigma msg  08:12, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't know exactly what Nableezy sent Tariqabjotu, (there are several things), the information I sent about Eric1985 was nothing like the articles I am aware of by and related to JJG, this was very personal information that contrary to JJG, Eric wasn't revealing to the public. So this was clearly not the same thing. I only afterwards saw these several things written by JJG, I had not seen anything of this before, and I saw it as that his name was no issue for him. I can not remember what people where discussing half a year ago about their personal interpretation about what is or what is not "outing", I'm only talking about how I saw it when I saw what he had written. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 11:17, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

Non-disruptive edit
Data removed contained crime information that has no bearing on technical details, history, or development of the Mini-14 rifle. Thus this is a legitmate edit and is no way disruptive unless you are anti- Second Amendment. Leave the edit alone. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.150.239.200 (talk) 03:24, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I did not make whatever edit you're referring to. You're probably looking for http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:E2eamon  Enigma msg  04:13, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Ah ok.
My apologies then. The notice popped up within seconds of the edit I put in on the Mini-14 article. Curious. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.150.239.200 (talk) 23:40, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
 * My edit to your talk was from 2009. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:69.150.239.200&action=history  Enigma msg  03:13, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 07:18, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Flag of Western Sahara Wiki Project
Hello Enigmaman. I would like you to settle a problem about the Wiki project of Western Sahara. The founder of this project (User:Koavf) claims publicly that he's a pro-SADR (Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic) and anti-Morocco. He also says, since he's the founder, that he owns the project and has the right to write anything he wants in it. That's why the project holds the flag of the SADR. But the UN states that Western Sahara is a territory under dispute and therefore UN does not recognize any sovereignty (either Moroccan or Sahrawi) on this territory. So, there must be no flag for the project or at least the flag of the UN. The presence of the flag of the SADR as the one of Western Sahara is complete non-neutrality. Would you like please to settle this? I would be most greatful if you could do something. Thanking you in advance. Moroccan Sahara (talk) 13:58, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Hi, I'm not sure why you chose me, because I don't often edit anymore. At this point in my life, other activities have taken priority over Wikipedia, and I can no longer devote much time to editing or reading over disputes.  Enigma msg  21:31, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

WP:AE
Dear administrator,

I am not really sure if you are in fact an administrator at AE or not, but I am posting this message anyway since I found your name among the decision-making administrators in AE cases. If it's not too much to ask, could you please review the AE case on MarshallBagramyan? The whole case is based on an imposed indefinite restriction for not labeling authors any names or dismissing them based on their nationality, place of birth or publication, ethnic group, religion or similar general characteristic (and the report clearly said “This restriction is to be enforced by blocks or other discretionary sanctions”) and violation of another topic ban earlier in 2010 when the user violated his ban twice and went unnoticed? The reported user MB has taken this report out of context by posting long blocks of replies which had already wrote last time he was reported and diverting the attention of the readers and administrator away from the subject which is an imposed ban and his violation of it. All I am asking is for administrators to take action on the violation of restriction for fair and just decision. Angel670  talk  17:37, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I can't help with this issue.  Enigma msg  02:25, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Your opinion at AE regarding SD
Hello Enigmaman. At Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement you indicated that 'this will continue to come up unless something is done'. This thread has got so old that I was thinking it is time to close it. Would you like to make a more specific proposal? I do not have any strong opinion myself, but I tend to support closing without sanctions if those presenting the arguments don't have a coherent case which is easy to follow. SD's behavior may be a bit unusual, but he would not be the first person to deserve that adjective to work on I/P articles. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 04:57, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I am in agreement with the implemented remedy.  Enigma msg  02:25, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Did someone send you a message to go to the enforcement?
Hello Enigmaman, I was wondering if someone sent you a message of wiki to go to the enforcement? I also left you a response: --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 06:41, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
 * No, no one sent me a message of wiki. Sorry, I've been off wikipedia for several days. More pressing issues to deal with.  Enigma msg  02:25, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Vandalism?
Just come back on Wikipedia and it says I have been caught for vandalism or something? and what makes it even more strange is that it was issued in June 2008? What the hell? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.102.20.22 (talk) 16:46, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Someone using your IP in June 2008 vandalized someone's talk page twice.  Enigma msg  17:33, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive invitation
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 08:57, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

Re: Mario Ančić
No problem - happens a lot lately, there's been a some kind of change of infobox syntax. I've visited the article before, so I knew there was a picture there... GregorB (talk) 21:57, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

About the article 'Warfaze'
Hello sir, You deleted an article named 'Warfaze' which was about a renowned heavy metal band of Bangladesh. It is one of the most popular bands of all time in Bangladesh since 1984. There should be an article in wikipedia about them. Please help us to recreate it. regards, Siyam Potasiyam (talk) 12:59, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Deleted repeatedly because of blatant copyright infringement.  Enigma msg  05:39, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 16:21, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

You removed Pezhham
Hi Engigmaman, I am Gina and I am the author of the article I wrote about Pezhham Akhavass. You deleted my page and removed it for no good reason. Pezhham is an amazing artist and the page was about his work in developing the instrument tombak and being one of the virtuoso musicians of his generation. In fact he was part of the Masters of Persian Music Tour of US as featured at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Masters_of_Persian_Music and the links were about the musicians he has worked with that all have pages on wikipedia and the discography and talked about his life work. WHY did you delete this page? You have have emailed me and told me what is wrong with it, I am not an expert on wikipedia, but I am very angry and feel its totally unfair that you removed my page for no reason. There were links to media and to other sources prooving every point. you are abusing your power. Please put my page back immediately or tell me what it needs. Instead of deleting people's work, you should have better communication skills to resolve whatever issue you have. Thats so not cool. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Desertgypsy (talk • contribs) 02:50, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Obviously there was a reason and being rude about it is not going to help your cause, unless your goal is to be blocked.  Enigma msg  16:14, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Additionally, I did not delete it. I merely deleted this.  Enigma msg  16:19, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 01:03, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 10:36, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Season's tidings!
FWiW Bzuk (talk) 13:55, 25 December 2011 (UTC).

GOCE 2011 Year-End Report
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 06:10, 2 January 2012 (UTC)