User talk:Enjayt

February 2023
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Warneet, Victoria, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 07:32, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Please cite your sources, this is important, then we can verify your addition. Materialscientist (talk) 07:44, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
 * We need verifiable and reliable sources, see WP:NOR, WP:RS. Materialscientist (talk) 07:56, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article. ''Stop edit warring WP:3RR. Stop writing original research WP:OR. Stop not using any sources WP:RS. Stop insulting an admin and promising to stop your destruction but then doing it robotically anyway. Stop editing anything until you read and comply with all policies. You can get tutilege at the Tea House.'' — Smuckola(talk) 23:03, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use inappropriate or abusive edit summaries. Yoshi24517 Chat   Online  00:32, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Wrong infomation
Also you are allowing information that is clearly wrong to be left on a page. Not great at editing are you? Enjayt (talk) 00:32, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Verifiability is a core Wikipedia policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Daniel Case (talk) 06:23, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Hey Daniel, thanks for the help. Wikipedias editors have made this a very unpleasant experience. “Editors” such as Spunkola are passive aggressive and rude. You can all stick it. You suck. Enjayt (talk) 08:20, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Editors on this page
“Editors” on this page are unhelpful, don’t offer any assistance and are generally useless. It is no wonder wiki is lacking in correct information because these “editors” have no idea of correct content nor information they just like blocking and sending ridiculous unhelpful comments. Really appalling actually. I thought twitter was bad until I came here. Enjayt (talk) 06:54, 20 February 2023 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry if anyone treated you wrong, but you certainly not doing yourself any favors acting responding with comments like this either.
 * The truth is, there's a bit of a learning curve to editing Wikipedia. Some take the time to learn it. Others don't, then take it personally when people tell them they're doing it wrong, blame others, and never reflect on the fact that they're in the wrong and simply "don't know what they don't know".
 * You're at a crossroads. You can still turn it around and learn to edit constructively. But you're probably out of second chance s if all you're going to do is call people names and idly complain. No more of that. Sergecross73   msg me  19:37, 21 February 2023 (UTC)