User talk:Enkarmaband

August 2023
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to DWRT-FM—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 09:56, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to America's Next Top Model (season 5). Wikipedia is not a collection of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links may include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 11:46, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to America's Next Top Model (season 5). It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 12:03, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

Removal of references
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Tripura Sundari, you may be blocked from editing. Skyerise (talk) 12:20, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

August 2023
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Sons of Butcher (TV series) have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:23, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Sons of Butcher (TV series) was changed by Enkarmaband (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.866092 on 2023-08-23T07:23:23+00:00

Are you copying articles into a different app and pasting them back in?
Hi, I'm User:Folly Mox. It looks like the wording and grammar changes you've been making to articles are good, but something about your editing process is breaking how the articles are stored.Not all of the information in a Wikipedia article is visible. If you are copying into another app, editing the article, and pasting the results back into the editor, this might explain the problems that are happening. References, for example, are not just: there's a lot of important information behind that, which is visible to the computer.Please use Wikipedia's built in editor to edit. Folly Mox (talk) 07:31, 23 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Information orange.svg Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Folly Mox (talk) 07:40, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Nuvola apps important.svg Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Edward Einhorn, you may be blocked from editing. Folly Mox (talk) 07:43, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi Enkarmaband. Thank you for reading my messages and stopping with the editing method that was breaking templates. I'm sorry I had to undo your copyedits and improvements to article prose. Please feel free to edit those same pages and make the same changes in a way that doesn't break the code behind the templates.For help editing, you might want to have a look at Help:VisualEditor. You're also always welcome to ask questions at the Teahouse, which is specifically for new users with questions about how to edit.If you'd like to see which pages you edited so you can go through and make the same grammar improvements again without damaging the referencing in the articles, you can find them in Special:Contributions/Enkarmaband.Your edit to John Vernon Lord worked as intended, so you're making good progress, but it looks like a few of the changes were made to direct quotes, which we're not supposed to do because it breaks Verifiability, a core content policy.I see you've gotten off to a bit of a rough start, and I'm sorry if my messages above contributed to a negative early experience with Wikipedia. Feel free to ask at my talk page if you have questions, or you can ask your mentor, by finding the Mentorship Module on your homepage. You can also use the Help me template on any talk page (including here on yours) and a volunteer will come along shortly to assist. Thanks, Folly Mox (talk) 19:47, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Enkarma
Hello Enkarmaband,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Enkarma for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 11:59, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Enkarmaband. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the edit COI template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see );
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see );
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 11:59, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

 Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because your account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must: To do this, post the text  at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked.
 * Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and
 * Provide a new username.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can go here to search and see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is available to be taken.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text  at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Alexf(talk) 17:28, 13 April 2024 (UTC)