User talk:Enkhzaya.b

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Nambaryn Enkhbayar, you may be blocked from editing. -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  01:06, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

June 2014
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Nambaryn Enkhbayar, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. — Mel bourne Star ☆ talk 07:34, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

August 2014
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Nambaryn Enkhbayar, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. —MelbourneStar ☆ talk 10:09, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Nambaryn Enkhbayar, you may be blocked from editing. Furthermore, you cannot add content to said article without a verifiable reliable source - that is published. —MelbourneStar ☆ talk 11:10, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

January 2015
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Nambaryn Enkhbayar. --Latebird (talk) 23:22, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --Latebird (talk) 23:41, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

This is related to your continued deletion of information at Nambaryn Enkhbayar. If you continue after the block expires, it is likely that the next block will have a much greater length. Nyttend (talk) 12:29, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

February 2015
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for Continued removal of sourced material after prior block at the same article, as you did at Nambaryn Enkhbayar. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JodyBtalk 15:36, 16 February 2015 (UTC)