User talk:Enlil Ninlil/Archive 3

Language groups
Hi, nice job with the language groups. I noticed the nyungar language article and linked the page Nyungar (or Noongar). Let me know if I can assist with western australian stuff. I must ask if you mind tidying up the language on your user page? Cheers, ☻ Fred|☝ discussion |✍ contributions  17:15, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I hope you don't mind me pointing that out. I meant to say before, the Sea monsters wikiproject is a favourite of mine. I keep forgetting to join ... Best regards ☻ Fred|☝ discussion |✍  contributions  19:50, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I like your user page. Lots of biota, the marbled gecko, Phyllodactylus marmoratus as I know it, is one of my favourites. They like my roses. Sorry to hear about your assimilation by the borg, how is that all going? Cheers mate, ☻ Fred|☝ discussion |✍ contributions  19:59, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Songhai Empire
Hi, Enlil. first, i'd like to thank you on your interest in the songhai empire article. I have some concerns, however; I wanted to address them before making any edits and causing any drama. I noticed you put a nation bar on the far right side. It is obviously ripped (nearly verbatum) from the Mali Empire page. There's nothing wrong with putting a chart (the page needed one), but the information there is mostly wrong. The Mali Empire and Songhai Empire were very different and many of the attributes of the Mali Empire chart don't apply to Songhai. The reason i'm saying this is because I made the chart for the Mali Empire and did 90% of the research on that page.

I don't think it's neccesary to remove the chart altogether. Maybe we could work on it together to make it more up to snuff. Below are some glaring errors we need to address

Any of those dates is pretty legit. 690 is too early as we need a date when the Songhai were established at Gao. 1901 counts Songhai's continuation in Dendi. Although the Songhai administrative structure survived and even thrived in Dendi, counting it as a part of the Songhai Empire would be like counting the Roman Republic and Roman Empire as the same entity or perhaps the Roman Empire and the byzantine empire.
 * Languages- we can probably just put Songhai here. There were speakers of many languages within Songhai, but the administrative tongue was Songhai.
 * Religion- the state religion of Songhai, in all its forms, was Islam. Ancestor worship was done by the peasantry, but the ruling classes were vehemently muslim.  In Mali, the ruling class was muslim in name only.  That's why I included ancestor worship and islam for that particular chart.
 * Government- definately not a constitutional monarchy. Mali was a constitutional monarchy cuz it actually had a constitution. Songhai had no such document. It is my opinion that Songhai's government was simply a MONARCHY.
 * Title of head of state- Mansa is completely wrong. Sonni was the title after 1275. Askiya was the title after 1493. i'll do some digging and find out what the title was before that. It definately was not Mansa.  Only Mande peoples used that term.
 * Legislature- No evidence exist of a legislature and they did not borror the Gbara. The Gbara (Grand Assembly) only existed in the Mali Empire. We should probably omit this portion until we know for sure if they even had a legislature.
 * History- because this page is dedicated to the Songhai Empire and not necessarily its incarnations before reaching "imperial" status, I suggest putting one of the three proposals for the establishment and disestablishment of the Songhai Empire
 * c. 1000-1591. This date goes from the Songhai's establishment in Gao (c. 1000) to its fleeing to Niger after the Battle of Tondibi (1591).
 * 1275-1591. This is from the establishment of the Sonni kings who constantly asserted their independence from Mali until the moroccan invasion.
 * 1375-1591. This is from when Songhai gained full independence of Mali forever until the moroccan invasion.
 * Currency- this is accurate enough I believe. I don't know if they used gold dust, though. i'll take a look around for more info
 * National symbol- needs removing. no data to back it up.  that info is specifically from and for Mali.

Hope I haven't taken up too much of your time. please get back to me when you can. i look foward to hearing from u. Scott Free 17:21, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Request for comment
Hi, I have some comments about the articles User:Numismaticman created. Please join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Numismatics. Thanks. --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 03:46, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Alderney and Ambliara numismatic articles
I saw nothing wrong with creating articles on Banknote of Alderney and Banknote of Ambliara, as both Alderney and the Indian Princely States' banknotes and coins are listed separately in the Krause and Pick catalogues. The articles are intended to be based on these catalogues, including the 'KM', 'P', 'PS', or another catalogue number in the articles. - (Numismaticman 06:56, 4 September 2007 (UTC))

Postal Order articles
What is wrong with creating articles for the postal orders of the various countries that issued them? They're numismatic items as well. - (Numismaticman 06:56, 4 September 2007 (UTC))

Postal Orders of Fiji
What do you want to know about them? I don't know much about them myself. The collecting and study of postal orders is a very new thing to me myself. - (Numismaticman 09:47, 4 September 2007 (UTC))

Postal Orders were used as currency
The Postal Orders of the Orange Free State and the Postal Orders of the South African Republic were used as currency during the Second Boer War. The British postal orders were used as currency during World War I and World War II. The modern British postal orders still depict the portrait of Queen Elizabeth II, so they still look like banknotes to a certain degree. Yes, they can be paid into a bank account in the same way that you pay a cheque into one. - (Numismaticman 09:57, 4 September 2007 (UTC))

Cooksonia taxobox
Hi, Just to say thanks for popping a Taxobox on Cooksonia! All the best, Verisimilus  T  20:55, 10 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Ooh, it's not very encyclopaedic, is it. Unfortunately, it's not a subject I know much about (oddly enough). I'll have a dabble when I get the chance...  In terms of things to do, it'd be nice to see some of the Ediacaran biota, especially the more famous, better represented on WP soon, as the main article is in the queue to appear on the main page - I'd like the interested reader to be greeted by as many good articles as possible! And if you've got a scientific eye, you could always take a look at Cambrian explosion, which may hopefully be in the early stages of a push to FA status...
 * Cheers,Verisimilus  T  22:36, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Original Research Image Problem
If self-made images are allowed, then why is UtherSRG forbidding me from posting reconstructions?--Mr Fink 11:22, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use disputed for Image:Guinee-25Sylis.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Guinee-25Sylis.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:22, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Template:New Zealand currency and coinage
Chochopk can you please review this template if you have time thankyou Template:New Zealand currency and coinage Enlil Ninlil 05:42, 24 September 2007 (UTC)


 * I'm sure you put a lot of thought into it. So I'm probably sorry for saying this. In general, I believe a nav box is appropriate when a majority of links exists. Template:Japanese currency and coinage still has many red links. I'd prefer improving existing articles first, and fork off more articles if necessary, instead of creating too many stub articles too fast. If I were to work on the New Zealand currency, I'd probably create Banknotes of the New Zealand dollar, move some contents over, improve it, expand the table, extend the history backward. And when that's done, I would probably improve coins, and if that's done, I would probably create Banknotes of the New Zealand pound. Well, you get the idea. And frankly, I don't like the idea of having a denomination as an article. It is against the currency taxonomy:
 * Currency (NZ£, NZ$)
 * Coins/banknotes
 * Series
 * Denomination


 * In some places where inflation is stable, but faster than developed countries, "1 dollar" or "1 unit" of something could be the largest coin 30 years ago, and now the smallest coin. They would have different meaning, and it's weird (at least to me) to compare them. Somebody probably started denomination as an article within USD, and the idea gets copied to other currencies. --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 08:30, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:BocMop10Brown.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:BocMop10Brown.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 13:44, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Eritrea-1Nakfa.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Eritrea-1Nakfa.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:53, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Melbourne Meetup
Hello! The Melburnians are having another meet-up! Please consult this page if you are interested to participate in the discussion! Thanks! Phgao 03:25, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Kulin
OK, sorry about that. The bot generates articles on Polish villages automatically, but leaves comments if it finds an article already in its place. I do tidy these up manually a bit later, but I guess this time you beat me to it. Cheers, Kotniski (talk) 10:50, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Templates
I just had to stop to say some of your templates are absolutely adorable, do you mind if I steal a couple of those? Dreg743 (talk) 15:52, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:JordanPNew-1Dinar-2002.png
Thanks for uploading Image:JordanPNew-1Dinar-2002.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:58, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Hezbollah userbox
Hello. You used to have a userbox expressing support for Hezbollah, a group that is considered to be a terrorist organisation in many countries. I have removed the userbox because the consensus of editors indicates that it is unnecessarily divisive and inflammatory, and because it was based on the template User Hezbollah that has been repeatedly deleted for this reason. Such boxes are not allowed according to our rules about inappropriate user page content, and in accordance with Wikipedia not being a battleground. Please do not re-add this userbox, or you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia or your user page may be protected. For further information, please see the discussion at WP:ANI. Thanks, Sandstein (talk) 08:44, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Featured article candidates/Macau
Hi Enlil Ninlil! the article Macau is currently on FAC page. I am not sure if any more copyedit is required/needed. If possible would you please kindly go there and check it since you are one of the member of wikiproject Macau. If the article is already FA-ready, please let me know. I personally think that it is OK!! Coloane (talk) 05:35, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:WesternSamoaP26-5Tala-(1985) f.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:WesternSamoaP26-5Tala-(1985) f.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 08:42, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Crinoid extinction?
Hi there, thanks for your tidying of the Echinoderm classification. I noticed that you marked the Crinoidea extinct - did you perhaps mean to mark the Paracrinoidea? I've not got the experience with the subject to know where the tombstone should rightly lie! Cheers, Verisimilus  T  08:44, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Turkmenistan 007.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Turkmenistan 007.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:31, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Australian 1999 20 cent piece.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Australian 1999 20 cent piece.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:55, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:500 dong.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:500 dong.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:58, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:100South Vietmanese đồng1966b.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:100South Vietmanese đồng1966b.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:45, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:100South Vietmanese đồng1966f.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:100South Vietmanese đồng1966f.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:46, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:1000 Kip(1996).jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:1000 Kip(1996).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:32, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:1000000zaz.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:1000000zaz.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:41, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:1000000zaz2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:1000000zaz2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:43, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:100Kip1957.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:100Kip1957.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:11, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Last finnish coins.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Last finnish coins.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:39, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:KatangaP7a-50Shillings-1960 f.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:KatangaP7a-50Shillings-1960 f.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:49, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Malawi50kwacha.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Malawi50kwacha.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 00:53, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

ping
... in case you didn't see it yet on Wikiversity, Erkan Yilmaz ( talk ?, wiki blog ) 16:40, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:20080405082.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:20080405082.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 07:04, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Paama language
Hallo, When you create a page, could you add a stub type and a category? I've just spent ages drilling down through the categories to find the right one, and you presumably could have done it in an instant! Thanks. PamD (talk) 08:37, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Concordant
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Concordant, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? -- Andrew   Mill  09:00, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Last finnish coins.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Last finnish coins.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:09, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Hi
Any specific reason for the drop of List of dragonfly species recorded in Australia - am thinking of picking it up - cheers SatuSuro 04:03, 9 May 2008 (UTC) Hey I can relate to that - I have a list of abandoned projects as long as my watchlist :( - hey thanks - I am using the same text - and also am thinking of tying in some weird web sites and some of my own photos of some of the common ones - its interesting there is a relatively low level of endemics in the list - btw - very impressed by your byzantium subject area - intriguing - thanks for your ok - please feel free to watch/check me - and thanks for the good luck - you have set a good start there anyways - cheers SatuSuro 04:19, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks every step and you are making it easier whenever i get a good block of time - thanks for being inspired again - its a very good start! SatuSuro 10:44, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Billet mauricien.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Billet mauricien.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 05:17, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Removing WikiProject tags
Hi Enlil,

Please don't remove WikiProject tags on talk pages when you add another tag. Best, Firsfron of Ronchester  03:20, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Palaeontology
Hi Enlil,

I've taken the liberty of 'advertising' your new wikiproject to the guys at Dinos, pterosaurs, monsters from the deep and geology. See is some support, opinions and/or criticism can be drummed up. I've started making edits to the project too, hopefully thats okay. Cheers, Mark t young (talk) 15:39, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

message
I'm sending this to all the wikiproject:mammals participants. There's a naming guideline up for discussion on the talk page, and the more people get involved the more valid any consensus drawn. Ironholds 19:14, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Talk page tagging for WP:PALAEO
You may wish to contact User:Compwhizii, who operates a bot that could automate the talk page tagging process. (It must be a huge job to do by hand!!) Martin  (Smith609 – Talk)  09:43, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Tagging unreferenced
Hi Enlil,

When tagging articles as unreferenced or needing factual verification, can you use an edit summary? It makes the edit a lot easier to spot so that it can be corrected. Best wishes and happy editing, Firsfron of Ronchester  12:19, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Project talk page tagging for WP:VIET
 Blnguyen  had requested me for the service of TinucherianBot to tag articles in the categories in WikiProject Vietnam/Categories for the WikiProject Vietnam. I request the members to kindly have a look, carefully verify ALL the categories and remove all the possibly wrong categories. Please Dont misunderstand by being cautious here, as we have faced many issues with such huge scale bot tagging earlier. Once I get the final go ahead, I will start the bot with the final list. Thank you for choosing TinucherianBot for the project,. It is a pleasure working for this project...I have also left a note at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Vietnam and request your comments there. You are receiving this message as you are a member of the project. Thanks --  Tinu  Cherian  - 06:05, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Notability of Palladium (Australian band)
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Palladium (Australian band), by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Palladium (Australian band) seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Palladium (Australian band), please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 06:20, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

Scrolling lists
Please do not add scrolling lists, ever, to articles. In addition to breaking certain accessibility features, there is a bug in the MediaWiki printable.css which renders such lists unprintable if they overflow. For more information, please see MOS:SCROLL. siℓℓy rabbit (  talk  ) 20:33, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

List of Australian Aboriginal languages
I moveda very large table to the talk page of List of Australian Aboriginal languages. Hope it's helpful. Ling.Nut (WP:3IAR) 01:08, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles: Rollcall
At WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, we recently did a purge of the members list, which your name was on. Please re-add your username as well as your area of expertise at our list of participants if you plan to stay active in this Wikiproject. Also, a discussion is going on regarding the standardization of taxonomy in lizard articles, located in this section. We'd like to have some more voices in this matter. Thanks everyone!  bibliomaniac 1  5  23:09, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

:o
Anytime. (P.S. Keep on not giving a fuck) -- The Prophet Wiz ard of the Cray on Cake  02:13, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Dog breed
'' You asked: Does anyone know what this breed is, It maybe a mixed breed of the Poodle family. As there are so many breeds it is hard to tell.'' (Re Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Dogs) Hi, is that your dog? The only ways to reliably identify a breed are through the ancestry documented in its registration papers (or those of its parents) or with genetic testing. Mixed breeds aren't specific breeds. The coat looks poodleish, however, the nose looks too short and wide for a poodle; it is either mixed with something with a square nose or it may be one of the many Bichon type breeds.--Hafwyn (talk) 00:30, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

A very large and widespread CopyVio problem
I want to alert all Project Gastropods staff to the fact that we currently have a very major CopyVio problem which compromises the integrity of the encyclopedia, and opens the door for legal action against Wikipedia. This problem is spread across a huge number of gastropod articles (approximately 800 to 1,000) and it also spills over into the other molluscan groups. I am asking ask everyone who is available to help out with this in whatever way they can, but please do so in an organized and unified fashion so we all know what is going on. It seems that all of the articles in the Category: Molluscs of New Zealand contain a great deal of text that is copied verbatim or almost verbatim from the 1979 book by Powell, New Zealand Mollusca. I have had no experience in dealing with a crisis of this magnitude. Any help that any of you can offer or suggest is more than welcome. Invertzoo (talk) 21:13, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Going to hell
Just noticed the following userbox and stole it. Below is a simplified version. Thanks. --  spin control 00:57, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles needs you!
Ahoy there! We're conducting our annual purge of the participants list for WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, in an effort to make sure our members stay current with events at the WikiProject. If you would like to renew your participation with the WikiProject, simply drop by the participants list and re-add your name to the list in alphabetical order using the following format:. Also feel free to add your specialties or points of interest. If you don't have the time or don't feel like rejoining, then ignore this request; you can rejoin at any time you'd like. Cheers,  bibliomaniac 1  5  00:12, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Algae
WikiProject Algae was started as a meeting space on Wikipedia for improving the taxonomic representations of the groups of organisms called algae. Please join other editors at the talk page (Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Algae) to discuss a higher level taxonomy for algae to be used on Wikipedia.

I saw your user name at the now inactive protist project. I see you work largely on paleontology projects (lame pun intended), but did not know if your interests might extend to extant algal species. I hope to expand the project to extinct groups of organisms and write articles on micropaleontology at some point. For now, it's modern species. Please stop by if you would like to help or if you have suggestions about what needs to be done. --68.127.232.132 (talk) 19:21, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Project Gastropods
Hi Enlil Ninlil, I just wanted to ask if you are still active in WikiProject Gastropods? I am asking that because I am attempting to update our member's list. Thanks, Invertzoo (talk) 22:32, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply note! More power to you! Invertzoo (talk) 23:20, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 02:53, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Sorry for the offensive edit description.
Some anonymous editors claims pound sign as symbol of Turkish lira without any cites and pearl is referenced for tr:İnci Sözlük (means Pearl dictionary, users of the website are mostly known as their mass vandalism events.). OnurT 04:12, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

WP Numismatics in the Signpost
"WikiProject Report" would like to focus on WikiProject Numismatics for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Also, if you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. -Mabeenot (talk) 20:41, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

RPC
Please read my answer here

--Carlo Morino aka zi' Carlo 12:37, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Announcement
Hello! I'm The Arbiter, one of the coordinators for WikiProject Zoo. I am proud to announce the launch of a new portal: Portal:Zoos and Aquariums! ZooPro, ZooFari, and I worked hard to create a new portal for information on zoos, aquariums, and the associated projects and articles on Wikipedia. If you could head on over, take a look at our work, and maybe learn some more about zoos and Wikiproject Zoo, it would be great! Cheers and Happy Editing!

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of The Arbiter (talk) at 03:29, 14 December 2010 (UTC).

WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles assessment drive
At WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, in which you are listed as a member, we're working on a pretty massive backlog (1000+ articles!) of unassessed articles. We would appreciate it greatly if you would help assess the articles in the link. It's simple to do!


 * 1) Read over the article.
 * 2) On the discussion page, look for the AARTalk template. Add in a "class" and "importance" parameter if the template does not have them already. Example:
 * 3) For the class, fill in the article's quality using the WikiProject's quality scale: stub, start, C, B, GA, A, or FA. Most unassessed articles will probably be stubs or start class articles, and definitely B or lower.
 * 4) For the importance, fill in the article's importance to the WikiProject using the importance scale: low, mid, high, or top. Most unassessed articles will probably be low or mid importance.
 * 5) Then you're done!

It's not a difficult task, but there's a lot to get done. Our hope is that we can chip through the backlog and assess every article within the auspices of the project. Thanks,  bibliomaniac 1  5  00:31, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject Viruses is back
Hello, We at WikiProject Viruses noticed that you used to be a participant of the project before the project went inactive. We would like to take this opportunity to invite you to become a participant of WikiProject Viruses again. We believe that viruses are an extremely important part of an encyclopedia, and that is why we need you! Our new project coordinator is. We hope you seriously consider our invitation. See you there. If you are interested in joining our crew again, please place a notice on Our Talkpage, or you will be removed from our participants list.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Viruses at 21:21, 24 February 2011 (UTC).

Nomination of Banknotes of the Indonesian rupiah for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Banknotes of the Indonesian rupiah is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Banknotes of the Indonesian rupiah until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  Ron h jones (Talk) 19:59, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

Melbourne meetup this Saturday
Hi there! You are cordially invited to a meetup at North Melbourne this Saturday (23 July). Details and an attendee list are at Meetup/Melbourne 16 Hope to see you there! JVbot (talk) 05:06, 20 July 2011 (UTC) (this automated message was delivered to all users at Meetup/Melbourne/Participants)

Invitation to help assess WikiProject Gastropods
Hi. I am inviting members of some WikiProjects to take part in evaluating their projects in order to help the Wikimedia Foundation better understand such projects from the inside, to encourage reflection on best practices, and to compile a list of best practices as recommended by a number of projects. I am contacting you because you are listed as an active member of WikiProject Gastropods. Having witnessed that project's work in the past in my volunteer capacity, I'd very much like to include it. I hope that you will have time and interest in participating. As much or as little as you would like to supply would be gratefully received. The assessment questions are posted at WikiProject Gastropods/Self-assessment. I will myself steer clear of the page until after any discussion seems to have become dormant, at which point I will ask questions to make sure that I am developing a good overview of opinions. Thanks. --Maggie Dennis (WMF) (talk) 12:57, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited List of fossil sites, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Otway (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

WP Palaeontology in the Signpost
The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Palaeontology for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. -Mabeenot (talk) 19:44, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia Day Melbourne Meetup
Hi there. Just inviting you to the Melbourne meetup this Sunday at 11am, to celebrate our 11th anniversary. Details on that page. Hope to see you there! SteveBot (talk) 01:56, 11 January 2012 (UTC) (on behalf of Steven Zhang)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Marada, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Molar, Crown and Coronoid process (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

February Melbourne Meetup
Hi All. Just letting you know that we have another meetup planned for Melbourne, on Sunday, 26th February at 11am. More details can be found at the meetup page. Pizza will be provided. Look forward to seeing all of you there :-) SteveBot (talk) 23:00, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Wikiproject Virus Revival
You have previously shown an interest in Wikiproject Viruses by adding your name to our List of Participants. We are currently reviving the project, and would be grateful if you could indicate whether you are still interested in contributing or not on our Talk Page. You do not need to have expertise in virology to contribute to our project, as we welcome people with any degree of knowledge of the subject. Thank you.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Viruses at 17:29, 15 February 2012 (UTC).

Categorisation of Macau and Hong Kong
Can you help look into the following problem? From what I observed, many Macau and Hong Kong categories are subcats of the corresponding by-country parent categories (by their status of dependencies), and are subcats of the corresponding China or PRC categories with a Macau or Hong Kong catsort (in some cases an asterisk is used instead in place of the tho). But when I apply it to other categories, undid them en masse. Please response at WP talk:Categorisation. 218.250.159.25 (talk) 21:00, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

WP Amphibians and Reptiles in the Signpost
The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. -Mabeenot (talk) 23:07, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Melbourne meetup
Hey all, just a reminder that there's a meetup tomorrow at 11am in North Melbourne. There are more details at the meetup page. Hope to see you tomorrow! SteveBot (talk) 04:28, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Science lovers wanted!

 * Hi Enilil! I'm so happy you signed up to participate in the project! Thank you. I do have a question, I saw that you signed up to participate in the staff participants section. I just wanted to clarify that you are Smithsonian Institution Archives staff? If so, great, we haven't met yet, but hopefully will. And if not, we can move you up with the rest of "non-SIA staff" folks. Thanks again and I can't wait to see what you find inspiration in the work on on our to-do list! SarahStierch (talk) 05:18, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Help needed with German translation
When Wikimedia Australia and State Library of Queensland held some wiki-training up in Ingham, Queensland, one participant (a new user) wanted to try translating an article into German. See de:Benutzer:Florasoft/Hinchinbrook Insel. If you have time, they would love to see someone helping them - even a little bit; that would encourage them to keep working on it. Cheers, John Vandenberg (chat) 14:19, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

July WMAU Melbourne Meetup
Hi, At last month's June meetup we discussed the idea of setting up a Training Course at a University of the Third Age (U3A) to be held in 2013 and named Becoming a Wikipedia editor. In order to get this course up and running we are calling for volunteers to help develop the idea, and either tutor part of the course, or provide one on one help to students in the class. All local Wikipedians are welcome to discuss this at our 11am meetup to be held this Sunday on 22 July. Please add your name to the attending list at Meetup/Melbourne 23. Food and beverages are provided. Cuddy Wifter (talk) 02:21, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

Meetup invitation: Melbourne 26
Hi there! You are cordially invited to a meetup next Sunday (6 January). Details and an attendee list are at Meetup/Melbourne 26. Hope to see you there! John Vandenberg 05:21, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Victoria)

Nomination of Jum sum for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jum sum is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jum sum until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Andrew327 17:06, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Timeline of the Syrian civil war (from January 2013), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Al Qusayr (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:25, 25 April 2013 (UTC)