User talk:Enneco-Gotzon

History of art
Hello EnekoGotzon. Please go to the Talk page and ask questions about what you intend to do before making any further changes in the History of art article. I've reverted your edits, as your modifications of dated or periods (epochs) are often erroneous. Please do not change any dated or periods (epochs) without checking the cited references first. Then discuss in the talk page. Thanks for your comprehension. Coldcreation (talk) 21:11, 8 August 2014 (UTC)


 * I have changed some dates of the periods because they mismatch even those expressed in the corresponding articles on Wikipedia. You can check it.--EnekoGotzon (talk) 22:00, 8 August 2014 (UTC)


 * I know the dates don't always correspond to other Wiki articles. The important thing is that they match the references cited. Have you looked at those dates? Coldcreation (talk) 22:41, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
 * To date the Paleolithic, as the article does, between 25,000-8000 BCE is a big mistake; even the Upper Paleolithic dates -very broadly– between 50,000 and 10,000 BCE. I think the value of a reference depends on its veracity; true is more important than reference, specially in such basic information as the subject we are dealing with. Some errors seemed so great that I did not feel the need for further verification. Anyway, I can accept that some of my proposals were a bit fussy, and consequently, inappropriate.--EnekoGotzon (talk) 12:09, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

I again had to revert you error. The article clearly refers to a period within the Paleolithic period extending between 25,000-8000 BCE, not the entire Paleolithic period. The sentence is thus not a mistake. It is correct. What you have written is a mistake. Please go to the Talk page before making any further changes. Thanks in advance. Coldcreation (talk) 00:46, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Please, excuse me, I thought my proposal was simple enough to not deserve starting a Community Talk. I'm sorry.--EnekoGotzon (talk) 21:06, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
 * This discussion has now been transferred to the Talk page of the article History of art. Coldcreation (talk) 00:51, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Ellipsis
Per MOS:ELLIPSIS: Wikipedia's style for an ellipsis is three unspaced dots ; do not use the precomposed ellipsis character or three dots separated by spaces Biogeographist (talk) 21:37, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
 * You are right; I'm sorry; please, excuse me... Thank you for correcting me. I will try to be as cautious as possible. Take care.--Enneco-Gotzon (talk) 22:04, 8 May 2020 (UTC)