User talk:Ennius europe

License tagging for Image:Gazeta sot prototype.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Gazeta sot prototype.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 20:06, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

Bruno Bala
The article Bruno Bala has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki 17:20, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

April 2007
Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with the page Skënder Gjinushi on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Sopoforic 09:43, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Gazeta sot prototype.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Gazeta sot prototype.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:56, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Nano article
I appreciate your efforts to add information to the Nano article. However, as you well know, Wikipedia guidelines require balanced articles. You have removed facts with citations to newspaper articles. Thus, as administrator of the Nano facebook page, you should make sure that other, referenced views are also expressed in order to make your article much more credible! As you can see, removing other facts makes the article look like a promotional pamphlet instead of an informative article. Note that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a marketing website. Thanks for removing some gossips but the removal of facts backed with references from newspaper articles cannot be accepted. Hoping for your genuine understanding Shikuesi3 (talk) 17:08, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

From: ENNIUS EUROPE Reply to: SHIKUESI3 The information you provided was just gossip with references. There were truly biased information, because they were taken by biased newspapers and it's a known fact that biased newspapers produce gossips to damage Mr.Nano. All the information I provided was just UNBIASED INFORMATION. It's a gossip to claim that Mr.Nano bought or is planing to buy a house or an hotel. It's untrue that the tragedy called "9 January" has anything to do with Nano. It's quiet untrue that Mr.Nano killed someone with his car, NO investigation ever took place. Just to mention some of them.