User talk:Enquire

Talk:Gary Utilities
Please consider moving the newly-created Talk:Glary Utilities to User:Enquire/Glary Utilities (talk) or some such and asking for a refund at WP:REFUND. The reason is that, where it is, the page is eligible for speedy deletion as a "page dependent on a non-existent page." I have put a note at the top of the page asking administrators NOT to speedy-delete it even though it is speedy-eligible. However, a REFUND is probably not going to happen based on 's comment
 * "I never delete an article for copyright reasons without first checking back to the earliest versions to see if there is a version I can revert to" in the text that you copied from his talk page archives. davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs)  15:51, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
 * I understand you had trouble making the move. I made it for you.  I don't know why the move failed for you.  With respect to moves, I have no more user-rights than any other "autoconfirmed" editor (that is, any editor who doesn't have a brand-new or rarely-used account).  davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)  20:16, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
 * I moved again because it was in a user page, even though it included "...(talk)" in the page title. I intend to start creating the content in the user page, per:
 * User:Enquire/sandbox/Glary Utilities ~ sandbox for new article "Glary Utilities" (currently red-link)
 * User talk:Enquire/sandbox/Glary Utilities ~ location where discussion ended-up
 * I hope to have roughed out an article on the above in my sandbox sub-page by the weekend.
 * Enquire (talk) 04:21, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Assuming good faith
Civility, maturity, et al require that simply leaving a less-than-elucidating edit summary in order to change a hatnote to feature, "For contemporary usage, see Registered Cossacks of the Russian Federation." may seem obvious and appropriate to you, but not to others. If you take a look at the talk page, you may get a sense of this being a contentious article. In contemporary usage, active groups of cossacks take on many more forms than the one you have picked out. The IP who left an uncivil edit summary in reverting your edit left an uncivil revert summary. I have reverted your reinstatement of the addition to the hatnote with a comprehensive rationale for the reversion.

Should you feel that I have made a mistake, please feel free to respond here or, alternatively, start a section on the subject on the relevant talk page. Thank you, and happy editing! --Iryna Harpy (talk) 09:37, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Talkback
--Iryna Harpy (talk) 05:48, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of crowdsourcing projects, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Geographic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tomnod


The article Tomnod has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not notable... fails

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheAirplaneGuy (talk) 06:54, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Wiki-markup
I noticed that you used HTML formatting for italics in a recent edit. On wikipedia, you can surround text by two single quotes (well, four, two before and two after) to get italic text. To get bold, use 3 single quotes on each side. For bold italic, use 5 on each side. Examples: Italic renders as italic. Bold renders as bold. Bold italic renders as, you guessed it, bold italic. See Help:Wiki markup for details. davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs)  21:26, 20 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Yes, I know that. Is there any reason why I should not use HTML formatting?
 * Enquire (talk) 21:30, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Mariées mais pas trop listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mariées mais pas trop. Since you had some involvement with the Mariées mais pas trop redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. GZWDer (talk) 13:52, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Invitation to Participate in a User Study
Thank you for your interest in our user study. Please email me at credivisstudy@gmail.com. Wkmaster (talk) 23:34, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

April 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=606418811 your edit] to Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:15, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

MH370
I've just added names to many of the citations there. It should make your job of moving the refs a bit easier. Regards, --  Ohc  ¡digame! 15:04, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your continued effort. Kindly note that it would be a waste of effort "cleaning up" the dates into yyyy-mm-dd format. The article has used the dmy format since the early days, and the yyyy-mm-dd would not be an improvement and would also violate MOS:NUM and WP:RETAIN. Regards, --  Ohc  ¡digame! 03:21, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
 * What you refer to is germaine to the article itself. Per citations, the ISO format is generally preferred, per Help:Citation_Style_1, see:

● Access and archive dates in references should be in either the format used for publication dates, or YYYY-MM-DD.
 * Enquire (talk) 05:19, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Most of the publication dates in the article are dmy and have been for a long time. Help:Citation_Style_1 does not contradict nor overrule MOS:NUM, so please leave those dates alone. Regards, --  Ohc  ¡digame! 06:11, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
 * FYI the yyyy-mm-dd date format allowed in WP is exactly that and no more. They may look like ISO dates on the surface, but WP does not follow all the strictures, so it would be a mistake to refer to them as such. --  Ohc  ¡digame! 06:15, 8 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Maybe this helps: |W3 ISO Dates ... how does YYYY-MM-DD NOT follow ISO 8601? Enquire (talk) 06:39, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

WP:3O
Hi Enquire. I have declined your request at WP:3O because you have not complied with the instructions there. Please note that the instructions call for a section link to a section on the article's talk page dedicated to the 3O discussion and instruct that No discussion of the issue should take place here – this page is only for listing the dispute. The WP:3O edit window also has comment line saying where to add your comment (between two capitalized HTML comments). I would have declined the request anyway on the grounds that the issue appears only to have been discussed on your talk page, not the article talk page. However, when filing any future 3O requests, please read and follow all the instructions given there. Regards, --Stfg (talk) 09:25, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Interlink Publishing for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Interlink Publishing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Interlink Publishing until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 17:40, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:17, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of CopyProof paper


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that CopyProof paper, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It covers a topic on which we already have an article - Security paper. (See section A10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Security paper, or to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Safiel (talk) 17:58, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of D+H


A tag has been placed on D+H requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.dh.com/about-us/corporate-information. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. shoy (reactions) 18:18, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Backer, Spielvogel & Bates


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Backer, Spielvogel & Bates requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Postcard Cathy (talk) 21:52, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Latest stable software release/Advanced SystemCare
Template:Latest stable software release/Advanced SystemCare has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Dingley (talk) 16:52, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Backer, Spielvogel & Bates


Hello, Enquire. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Backer".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the  or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 17:38, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Double-nosed Andean tiger hound for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Double-nosed Andean tiger hound is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Double-nosed Andean tiger hound until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

New mailing list for Wikimedia Canada
Good day, this message is to inform you that Wikimedia Canada has created a new mailing list operated by Mailman. This mailing list is for all discussions related to the Wikimedia movement in Canada, in both English and French. Announcements from Wikimedia Canada will always be bilingual, but you are welcomed to discuss in any language of your choice. The old google group will be abandoned. To join this mailing list, please go to. To send messages to the list, write to general(at)discussions.wikimedia.ca. Also, please forward this message to anybody who may be interested. Thank you and do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. JP Béland (WMCA) (talk) 13:58, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of CoolReader for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article CoolReader is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/CoolReader until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Petilil (talk) 12:05, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

David Ray Griffin
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:David Ray Griffin § Description and interests. Thank you. Roy McCoy (talk) 01:49, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

"Goodnet" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Goodnet. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 15 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed,Rosguill talk 17:24, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Latest stable software release/BlackBerry Messenger (BBM)
Template:Latest stable software release/BlackBerry Messenger (BBM) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:41, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

Apocalypse Cow (documentary) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Apocalypse Cow (documentary), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. BOVINEBOY 2008 15:26, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Apocalypse Cow (documentary)
Hello, Enquire. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Apocalypse Cow (documentary), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Apocalypse Cow (documentary)


Hello, Enquire. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Apocalypse Cow".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:08, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

"Lək̓ʷəŋən" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=L%C9%99k%CC%93%CA%B7%C9%99%C5%8B%C9%99n&redirect=no Lək̓ʷəŋən] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. greyzxq talk 21:25, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

"Infobox book" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Infobox_book&redirect=no Infobox book] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Frietjes (talk) 18:18, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Quadrapod


The article Quadrapod has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "This word appears to only ever be used as a brand name."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &#x2130; mi1y&#x29fc;T&middot;C&#x29fd; 06:45, 28 March 2024 (UTC)