User talk:Enrichyourmind

Randy Pausch quotes section reversion
Wikipedia is not a directory. Quotes should be on Wikiquote. --O (谈 • висчвын) 00:16, 26 July 2008 (GMT)

July 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Justine Ezarik, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Justine Ezarik was changed by Enrichyourmind (u) (t) deleting 14116 characters on 2008-07-31T22:05:05+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 22:05, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Saint Francis Hospital
A tag has been placed on Saint Francis Hospital, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as the Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Master of Pies (talk) 01:00, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for advertising or promotion. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  01:02, 22 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Your new version was once again an advertisement, rather than a dispassionate description, and has been deleted. If you believe the hospital is genuinely notable (most aren't), create a new version of the article, with a better name (such as Saint Francis Hospital (Charleston), in a sandbox; then, when you believe it's ready, have a few editors look it over for problems and improvements. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  15:42, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for Image:Stfrancis er.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Stfrancis er.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 03:44, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Copyright infringement, Petri Hawkins-Byrd
The article Petri Hawkins-Byrd has been listed for investigation for copyright concerns at Copyright problems/2008 October 7. Material in that article duplicates the external site here. According to the article's history, duplicative information was added by you with this edit of August, 2008. Internet archives confirm that the material was previously published at the external site.

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences, unless they otherwise conform to our non-free content criteria. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you have any questions about our copyright policies or our non-free content criteria, please feel free to let me know at my talk page. Alternatively, you may wish to seek assistance at Wikipedia's help desk, typically monitored around the clock by volunteers. Thank you. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:53, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Rock Lake Pool
A tag has been placed on Rock Lake Pool requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. RadioFan (talk) 03:47, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

March 2009
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. Please use the template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's. RadioFan (talk) 03:51, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Rock Lake Pool
I have nominated Rock Lake Pool, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Rock Lake Pool. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. RadioFan (talk) 03:59, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. RadioFan (talk) 04:02, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Please do not assume ownership of articles. If you aren't willing to allow your contributions to be edited extensively or be redistributed by others, please do not submit them. RadioFan (talk) 04:04, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Hi there
Hi there Enrichyourmind,

First off, I'd like to welcome you to Wikipedia. I see you've been here before (your account was created in 2008), but you're still fairly new to the project. Concerning the article Rock Lake Pool, which you started, I have a few comments. As RadioFan says above, we all need to be careful with taking "ownership" of the articles we start, because this is truly an encyclopedia that anyone can edit. This means that others can edit the articles you start, to improve them. You can read some more about that here: WP:OWNERSHIP. Also Wikipedia has some policies about what can be included in an article. All statements need to be backed up with reliable sources, such as newspaper articles or published books. A statement that is not backed up with a reliable source-- even if it is true-- needs to be removed until a reliable source can be found. I have added eight sources to the Rock Lake Pool article. Please do not remove them. They help establish the validity of the article, and without sources, it will have to be deleted. Additionally, there are still some statements in the article that do not have sources. If these are to stay, they will need to be sourced, or they will have to go. If you have any questions about what I've written, feel free to leave me a message here. — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  05:34, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

West Virgnia Governor's Mansion
Hi,

I have reverted your edits to the talk page for West Virginia Governor's Mansion. There is a formal process whereby article can be nominated for WP:Good article status. You can't just tag the articles yourself. Even aside from what, this article is nowhere near the quality to qualify as GA status.

Brian Powell (talk) 19:22, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

October 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Abbot Lawn has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 16:42, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Reply
I understand, but I am not administrator, thus cannot delete it. Contact one of Wikipedia administrators for deletion requests. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 16:50, 23 October 2010 (UTC)