User talk:Enrico761


 * }

Reply
Hi, thanks for message. I deleted your article because
 * it did not provide adequate independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Although you gave some references, they were mostly affiliated to the company and in any case did not explain why it was notable.
 * it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic.
 * Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include: quickly came to the attention of the party’s new Leader,... genial, hard-working and reliable... She rewarded success... a charity which continues to help over 2000 young leaders... Known as a first-class public speaker... ASIS is working to become the preferred international gateway for parents who want to build their offspring's futures on the solid basis of a first class education. ASIS also plans to develop its teaching development mission, especially assisting international teachers gain better experience and qualifications... Through an easy and no stress process, pupils are able to choose their preferred schools, attend admission tests in locations closest to their homes, meet the school representatives for interviews and be considered for up to 7 Crores of scholarships to join their favorite schools... have access to some of Britain’s leading teacher-trainers.
 * it's all about what the company organisation does, little about the company itself other than that it's in London. How many employees? Turnover? Profits? Has the company ever received negative publicity? Who are its competitors?
 * However, you do find space for a self-serving and irrelevant Founder's profile and the inevitable "Vision" and "Mission" sections.


 * You have an obvious conflict of interest when it comes to editing articles about this subject. Thank you for declaring your interest. If, after reading the information about notability linked above, you still believe that your organisation is notable enough for a Wikipedia article (and that there is significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources), you could, if you wish, post a request at Requested articles for the article to be created. See also Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest.


 * and happy new year to you too  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  14:03, 1 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Not a reason for deletion, but I was surprised that a London company would write its article in American English  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  14:15, 1 January 2014 (UTC)