User talk:Enrico Manni

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sigal Music Museum (July 4)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sigal Music Museum and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Sigal_Music_Museum Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Asilvering&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Sigal_Music_Museum reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

asilvering (talk) 11:17, 4 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your message! :-) Enrico Manni (talk) 23:44, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
 * I submitted again the page for creation. God bless you. Enrico Manni (talk) 23:44, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

Blocked
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page:. Graham 87 05:22, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

It's clear that you're here for cross-wiki spamming and promotion. Your editing patttern is highly suspicious. Graham 87 05:22, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

Your recent edits (especially to articles and random deletion discussions) are incredibly disruptive and any admin would have blocked you for those. To get unblocked, I would ask that at a minimum you declare any conflict of interest you have (see below). Graham 87 06:02, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

Paid editing
Hello Enrico Manni. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Sigal Music Museum, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Enrico Manni. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Graham 87 06:02, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
 * This also applies to Davide Lo Surdo. Graham 87 06:02, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
 * I am not paid for edit the museum and for any other page. Enrico Manni (talk) 15:53, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Then why are you promoting them so strongly across several wikis? Graham 87 16:49, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
 * for create pages that didn't exist before nd honestly i did not think it was bad thing
 * i apologize for creating a nuisance Enrico Manni (talk) 17:06, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
 * How did you learn about Davide Lo Surdo? What about the Sigal Music Museum? Graham 87 17:19, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
 * I come to know mr lo surdo’s work with an article i saw in my news feed on google about his song full immersion on the Rollingstone 🇧🇷 website. this is the linkhttps://rollingstone.uol.com.br/musica/davide-lo-surdo-o-guitarrista-mais-rapido-da-historia-lanca-uma-nova-musica/
 * the museum searching more news online because i saw in this list of museums it was not having a page and i am working for submit few more drafts about the museums on that list without a page, if i will be allowed to edit again, otherwise no problem. 🙏 Enrico Manni (talk) 17:39, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
 * i knew that everyone could edit on Wikipedia but i did not know it was a problem Enrico Manni (talk) 17:41, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
 * The problem is that Rolling Stone Brazil source is actually extremely dubious and so is a lot of the sourcing about Davide Lo Surdo. See the articles for deletion debate for more information. He's being hyped but not by the sort of people who we would normally consider reliable sources. I'll unblock you if you promise to be very careful about promoting Lo Surdo's work and not to make bulk edits like this and this, which are highly disruptive. Graham 87 17:47, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
 * yes i m sorry nd promise to be more careful about editing. sorry about it Enrico Manni (talk) 17:51, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
 * for what is my knowledge, mr lo surdo is featured on notable sites and rollingstone 🇧🇷 for what i know is an important magazine, of course not as international rs but is important
 * also the sanremo award is notable and the video with youtuber has many views
 * for me he has enough Indipendent sources Enrico Manni (talk) 17:54, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I'll unblock you. But you have nowhere near enough experience on Wikipedia to judge notability of articles or independence of sources. Graham 87 17:57, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
 * i saw articles with no sources to be on wikipedia so thats why i mean and he is featured on journals who are on wikipedia
 * i would leave his page for now and see how the page evolve because in the last period he received more coverage featured on wiki Enrico Manni (talk) 18:05, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Articles with no sources are often older; newer articles are much less likely to have this problem. Just because articles are featured in a magazine/newspaper with a Wikipedia article, it doesn't mean the contents in said magazine/newspaper articles are true or balanced. As I said here, writing articles from scratch is actually one of the most difficult things to do well on Wikipedia. Making minor edits (e.g. fixing typos, copy-editing) is much easier and reading a variety of articles will give you a much better feel for the place ... but it'd be much better if you did that sort of minor editing in your native language, not so much here. For more questions about Wikipedia, please ask at the teahouse. Happy editing! Graham 87 18:13, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. The thread is Davide Lo Surdo, etc.. Thank you. Graham 87 07:07, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

Re: National Music Museum
Of course it's notable enough for Wikipedia ... it's a major university museum. Please ask such questions in future at the teahouse. Graham 87 03:09, 7 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Ok, thanks for the answer. I created the spanish version Enrico Manni (talk) 16:37, 7 July 2023 (UTC)