User talk:EnriqueCartagena

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Hi, please do not remove tags on articles you created as you did to Monteloeder. Also please be aware of WP:COI. I get a lot of google hits from your surname and Monteloeder. Smartse (talk) 16:38, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Monteloeder


The article Monteloeder has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:CORP, only source is company's site

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vrac (talk) 14:08, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

November 2020
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Aneto—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 11:45, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello Serols, why are you deleting my changes to mountain pages? This is not experiment. This is true value adding an external link to a page where there is more information about the mountain as well as tracks gps containing routes to ascend to the summit of the mountain.EnriqueCartagena (talk) 11:56, 8 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Hello EnriqueCartagena, please note Weblinks. Regards --Serols (talk) 11:58, 8 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Hello Serols, I did read Weblinks and to me it looks fine. The website BackFromSummit is not different to other mountain websites like SummitPost, Peakbagger, Hikr and others that are already linked in the External Links section of Wikipedia. Having said that, I fully respect Wikipedia project and in particular people like you that devote their time to ensure the high quality of this amazing encyclopedia. Thanks for your reviews and I won't any more links.EnriqueCartagena (talk) 12:22, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Adding spam links: Only warning
Hello there. I need to ask you, as a fellow mountaineer, not to attempt to add any more spam links to the 'Back from summit' website that you seem to be trying to promote. With its 16 members and no encyclopaedic content, it simply is not good enough for inclusion in this encyclopaedia, even if it is a laudable project in its own right. Providing there is additional information on external sites (such as SummitPost, Peakbagger, Hikr and others), then judicious use of such external links is fine. But not this site, I'm afraid. As an administrator here, I have to advise that I have reverted all those edits, and adding them again could result in edit rights being temporarily withdrawn. But, on a positive note, why not come and join us at WP:ALPS or WP:MOUNTAINS and help us improve articles on some of the summits you have climbed? It looks like you've done a lot in the Pyrenees. We often need better photos, and even many of the major summits in the Alps and Pyrenees still have very little to no information on them about first ascents, normal routes, glaciers or geology. Providing that any information you add is sourced to properly published guide books, or other Reliable Sources, and not from personal experience, your contributions will be fine. I can certainly say that working on improving mountain-related articles is a great way of reliving some of those past experiences and summit highlights. Kind regards, Nick Moyes (talk) 12:06, 8 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Hello Nick, I have to say that I'm quite impressed with the level of detail and kindness of your comments. After such a great reply I don't have any more to say, apart from saying that I fully respect Wikipedia project and in particular people like you that devote their time to ensure the high quality of this amazing encyclopedia. Thanks for your reviews and I won't add any more links. I will have a look at those pages that you mention.EnriqueCartagena (talk) 12:21, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I would probably have been really short with someone if they'd been adding links to something I knew nothing about (like TV shows), but here I can easily see you want to help out. So if you ever need any guidance here, just drop by my user talk page or ask on one of the two WikiProjects I linked to. The problem with linking to GPS track data is that we are an encyclopaedia, not a guidebook or manual on how to climb the peak. And one person's successful GPS track is another person's route to disaster. It's fine to let people search for information themselves, but we should not be presenting it or linking to user-generated data here. I look forward to seeing some great contributions from you! (If you want to see my cross side, just pop over to the talk page of Mont Blanc where I am currently having real problems from one editor who insists (based on no evidence) on adding an alternative name for the mountain to the lead sentence. It can be hard not to be rude sometimes when using a keyboard!) Cheers, Nick Moyes (talk) 12:42, 8 November 2020 (UTC)