User talk:Ensabah6

August 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Historical figures sometimes considered autistic, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you.

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Historical figures sometimes considered autistic. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

Sandy Georgia (Talk) 19:05, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

I have reverted this text, where you again added original research to a Wiki article. The text added is not substantiated by the source, and appears as your own opinion, which is original research-- text added to Wiki must be based on information published in reliable sources. Also, please read WP:3RR and refrain from re-adding the text without discussion, or you could be blocked from editing.

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

Sandy Georgia (Talk) 22:11, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

Please see 24.145.243.35 and note that WP:3RR applies to all edits from one user, regardless of account or IP used.

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you.

Sandy Georgia (Talk) 23:14, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Opossum Heidi


A tag has been placed on Opossum Heidi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Feezo (Talk) 01:45, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Introduction to loop quantum gravity


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Introduction to loop quantum gravity. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – loop quantum gravity. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at loop quantum gravity – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 23:45, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Quantum holonomy theory


A tag has been placed on Quantum holonomy theory, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Bazj (talk) 12:59, 1 February 2016 (UTC)


 * This article was previously created by User:Jespergrimstrup. Could you please explain any relationship you may have to Jespergrimstrup? The overlap between your editing seems strange. Bazj (talk) 13:06, 1 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Regardless of authorship, this article does nothing to overcome the issues raised at Articles for deletion/Quantum holonomy theory. It is too soon for an article until there have been substantial independent comments on this theory. See WP:No original research, which says: "If no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article about it." JohnCD (talk) 15:22, 1 February 2016 (UTC)