User talk:Ensellitis

Notability criteria for websites
Because Wikipedia's got no hard and fast rules it's impossible to give an absolute guide to what is and isn't accepted/deleted; some ridiculous pages have survived multiple deletion nominations just because people thought they were funny, and some very long and well written articles are deleted because they violate one guideline or another, or they have the bad luck to be nominated on a day when everyone involved is in a bad temper, or whatever. As regards websites in general, because Wikipedia isn't a directory only articles on websites that are either very important (Myspace, Google etc) or unusual enough to warrant their own article are kept, otherwise the system would be swamped with spam. As generally accepted guidelines, see WP:WEB (particularly the criteria section) and WP:ADVERT; as long as your article fits these guidelines, you'll generally be able to successfully challenge any deletion request successfully. (Read the current Article for Deletion discussions to get an idea of how people think when it comes to the AfD discussions. And remember these aren't votes - one keep request can be enough, providing it's convincing enough to persuade the admin who makes the final decision.

As you probably saw, the deletion discussion will stay up for 5 days, to allow time for the article to improve and/or for you to give reasons to keep it. -  Irides centi   (talk to me!)  16:45, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Screen lobd.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Screen lobd.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  MBisanz  talk 09:15, 30 December 2009 (UTC)