User talk:EnterStanman

Image copyright problem with Image:Silvio_dante.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Silvio_dante.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 09:11, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Silvio_dante.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Silvio_dante.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:09, 18 June 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 22:09, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Holy shit iphone1.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Holy shit iphone1.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 10:07, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Emo Shaman & Holy shit iphone.gif
This user uploaded said image and placed it on said page. The image in question is taken from http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=iphone and he has asserted no permission to use the copyrighted image. Please stop uploading inappropriate media.Falard 15:11, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

October 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Loonymonkey (talk) 23:34, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

BLP violation - September 2009
Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Drew Barrymore. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 14:58, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 15:26, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

September 2009
You have been blocked from editing for to prevent further disruption caused by your engagement in an edit war. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below.


 * Your edits were violations of our guidelines regarding biographies of living persons, as you were informed prior to being blocked. You were also edit warring. I have Drew Barrymore on my watchlist because it is a regularly vandalized article; your edits were inappropriate and were removed as per our guidelines. I suggest you read through some of the links you've had provided above to learn how to edit Wikipedia productively. Tony Fox (arf!) 16:01, 1 October 2009 (UTC)


 * The edits you made were unsourced (first-hand "hey I heard this on the radio" type sourcing is not appropriate), and disparaging to the subject. That violates BLP. Read the policy. Tony Fox (arf!) 16:17, 1 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Quite frankly, no. My view is that your edit is trivial, unnecessary, and disparaging. Again, read the policy. If you absolutely insist on including this trivial bit of information, take it to Talk:Drew Barrymore for discussion. I doubt you'll get very far with it. Tony Fox (arf!) 17:35, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. --SineBot (talk) 16:44, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

October 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Michael Jackson has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. —SpaceFlight89 06:16, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Michael Jackson. —SpaceFlight89 06:20, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text  below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

December 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add content (particularly if you change facts and please cite a reliable source for the content you're adding or changing.  This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. - SummerPhD (talk) 14:08, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

I have reverted the above article again, as you have not properly sourced the edit. If you continue to insist upon inserting unsourced information into Wikipedia articles, I will block you indefinitely until you indicate that you understand our requirements for referencing. Consider this a final warning. Tony Fox (arf!) 19:08, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

January 2010
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. - SummerPhD (talk) 01:54, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

August 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page User:Tony Fox has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Tyrol5  [Talk]  20:58, 23 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Yeah, blocked indefinitely as a vandalism-only account. If you want to appeal, you're welcome to. Tony Fox (arf!) 20:59, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:PizzaTale29.JPG


The file File:PizzaTale29.JPG has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 28 July 2019 (UTC)