User talk:Enter Movie

WikiProject Films March 2009 Newsletter
The March 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 00:04, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Terminator Timeline
Hey, I saw your Terminator Timeline and was wondering why there is no Timeline 3...? Also, I assume you've been watching T:TSCC... At the end of season 2, John travels forward in time with Weaver (who seems to be good... why is this, can they reprogram liquid terminators too now?!?!) but since the series is set after T2 and before T3, surely they must continue the series... At the beginning of T3 John is not in the future, he is back when Judgement day has not happened... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.28.179.240 (talk) 12:27, 11 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks, man. I didn't realize I didn't have a Timeline 3. I fixed it. As for the series, I watch the first season and, like, the first half of the second season. Then, I quit and watched the season finale (most likely the series finale). The timeline I made is a hypothetical one; it's not the official one. That's why I consider the events of the show taking place after the films. I have no idea what the writers of the show were planning. Hell, I didn't even get the ending. Catherine Weaver is apparently a good T-1000, and that's all I know. - Enter Movie (talk) 17:13, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

I know your timeline isn't an official one, but it is very good nonetheless and I found it by merely searching for Terminator Timeline. I don't understand how there can be a good T-1000, or what went into her leg... maybe that thing made her good and she originally was building Skynet? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.28.179.240 (talk) 11:42, 12 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks, man. However, I think this is the end for the show. It'll be left ambiguous until Josh Friedman reveals something. - Enter Movie (talk) 15:00, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

John Brancato and Michael Ferris
Hi, I see you created the above article. I came across it recently and, having consulted with wiki-acquaintances more knowledgeable about such things than I, and I'm considering basically re-writing the article and splitting it in two- a biography for each, each linking to t'other for context. I wondered if you had any strong opinion either way. Also, I'm struggling to find any decent info on the second guy and wondered if you had a source I haven't found? Kind regards, HJMitchell    You rang?  03:49, 26 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Go ahead. I don't mind. The article is a stub anyway. As for Michael Ferris, I'm sorry. I honestly don't know much about either of them. — Enter Movie (talk) 03:53, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Films April 2009 Newsletter
The April 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 07:42, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Films May 2009 Newsletter
The May 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 23:22, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Poster
Could you update the source link with the one for the new poster? Thanks.  BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  17:49, 19 June 2009 (UTC)


 * I use this website. I just browse to find the picture, select "350 px" and then select "Best" quality.   BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  21:11, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Hollywood Reporter
I am really confused on were you are getting these specific numbers from Hollywood Reporter. The reference you provided doesn't give any specific numbers or really any order to the top ten. BOVINEBOY 2008 03:12, 1 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Hollywood Reporter has the updated international figures. For example, it has the international gross for Terminator Salvation as $220 million, while Mojo has it at $201,543,644, which is false. The latter hasn't counted the internatonal figures for last weekend's gross yet. - Enter Movie (talk) 03:16, 1 July 2009 (UTC)


 * But how are you getting the total grosses? BOVINEBOY 2008 03:18, 1 July 2009 (UTC)


 * I took the domestic grosses from Mojo, which is obviously the most recent, and added it with the most recent reports of the international takings, which are from HR. So, yes, I used my computer calculator to individually add the grossings for each film. - Enter Movie (talk) 03:21, 1 July 2009 (UTC)


 * You really should wait until those numbers are confirmed. Wikipedia is based on verifiability and the numbers you provided are not verified by the source. BOVINEBOY 2008 03:31, 1 July 2009 (UTC)


 * How can you argue the Hollywood Reporter's reliability? It's one of the two major trade publications (with Variety) in the American entertainment industry. If anything, it's the most reliable source there is. - Enter Movie (talk) 03:34, 1 July 2009 (UTC)


 * I'm not saying is unreliable, I'm saying the numbers you provided aren't verifiable. First, you are using truncated numbers in your sums, which isn't accurate, but an approximation. And second, please wait until the sums are posted somewhere, whether through Reporter or otherwise. BOVINEBOY 2008 03:37, 1 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Well, if you think about it, the gross for, say, Terminator Salvation, which I'm most familiar with, as $342,080,084 is closer to the actual gross than $323,623,728. HR is usually the first source to get the international B.O. figures, and they're usually right in the ballpark. Wikipedia tries to stay as close to reliable as possible. - Enter Movie (talk) 03:43, 1 July 2009 (UTC)


 * It is most likely true; I just ask that you wait until a "worldwide gross" is confirmed. BOVINEBOY 2008 03:50, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Films June 2009 Newsletter
The June 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 08:27, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Lovely Bones teaser onesheet
I wasn't the one who removed it from the article, but for starters the image page could have an actual attributed source somewhere online. Yes, you could get it from Paramount, but we don't work that way here. Without it, for all we know you could have made it up yourself. Daniel Case (talk) 02:57, 24 July 2009 (UTC)


 * I actually got it from here. Hope that helps. - Enter Movie (talk) 03:00, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Pazuzu.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Pazuzu.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:46, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Films July 2009 Newsletter
The July 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 00:52, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Avatar-logo.jpg)
 Thanks for uploading File:Avatar-logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 10:37, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Films August 2009 Newsletter
The August 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:46, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

WP:FILM September Election Voting
The September 2009 project coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting seven coordinators from a pool of candidates to serve for the next six months; members can still nominate themselves if interested. Please vote here by September 28! This message has been sent as you are registered as an active member of the project. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 01:44, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Films September 2009 Newsletter
The September 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 06:29, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

WP:FILMS October Newsletter
The October 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. The newsletter includes details on the current membership roll call to readd your name from the inactive list to the active list. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 05:57, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Legion-poster.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Legion-poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 05:53, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Lovelybonesposter.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Lovelybonesposter.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 05:56, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Oobermindposter.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Oobermindposter.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 06:39, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Saw
Hello there, I noticed you are a member of the Saw task force, and therefore have foreknowledge of the Saw series, making you an editor with qualifications to review an article under the scope of Saw. I hope am I not bothering your editing, but I would like to bring to your attention that List of Saw media is currently being reviewed for a possible featured list status, but there is currently a major backlog in the amount of articles waiting to be reviewed. I would like to encourage you to participate in the discussion, found here, if you are interested. If you believe I am disrupting your editing or that my message was an attempt to sway your opinions per WP:Canvas, please let me know so I may fix my methods of bringing this conversation to editors attention, I am simply trying to prevent a backlog on the WP:FLC page. Happy edits, GroundZ3R0 002 (talk) 05:41, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The-wolfman-poster-1.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:The-wolfman-poster-1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.


 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.


 * If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.


 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 16:26, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:TS3 Poster.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:TS3 Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.


 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.


 * If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.


 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 16:35, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Iron Man 2 poster
Hi. How come you uploaded the exact same Iron Man 2 poster as I did, and replaced it on the article? You could have just updated the existing one. — Mike   Allen   04:46, 4 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Oh, I'm sorry. When I came upon the article, there was no poster. Apparently, after Quail18 replaced yours with the US domestic poster and it got deleted, nobody bothered to put yours back up. I honestly did not know there was already one up previously. I looked up the history briefly, saw that CommonsDelinker had deleted some poster because of some copyright violation, figured that there must've been no poster, and uploaded a new one. Again, I'm sorry. Enter Movie (talk) 16:44, 4 April 2010 (UTC)


 * I see now. Ever since I uploaded the image, people keep changing it.  There's like over 10 posters for Iron Man 2.  Most editors change the image without explaining why, so I revert them.  I just updated mine with yours, since it's better quality and a smaller size.  You'll probably got a bot message soon.  —  Mike   Allen   00:34, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Iron Man 2 film poster.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Iron Man 2 film poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 03:07, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Max magician and the legend of the rings.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Max magician and the legend of the rings.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles (talk) 01:45, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

McG
I have started my review here; it will not continue until the rather major concern has been fixed. Ironholds (talk) 11:44, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Predator technology for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Predator technology, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Predator technology until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. D O N D E groovily  Talk to me  06:14, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Pazuzu.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Pazuzu.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk  06:15, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Your Absence and more
No biggie, I actually forgot about the discussion until you popped back up. There were other discussions regarding cast lists and the like going on as well. I posted a request for comment at WT:FILM, because you and I cannot keep just going back and forth on this. We already were on the article talk page, and all we managed to do was collected one additional person when we moved. I tried to keep the RfC as neutral as possible but also summarize the basic debate. Hopefully, you don't feel that it is skewed to any one side.  BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  18:39, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

List of notable box office bombs's talk page
--ARTEST4ECHO (talk/contribs) 15:50, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Gooby Plz
RexReeze4 (talk) 04:19, 13 February 2013 (UTC)Shake shake shake ur gooby

A Good Day to Die Hard
I figured the possible that the sixth Die Hard movie that was on A Good Day to Die Hard article was obviously vandelism. Bruce Willis did mentioned that Die Hard 6 will likely happened, but it's too early to tell about this possible sixth Die Hard movie and there isn't a official title of that movie. BattleshipMan (talk) 04:27, 13 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Haha, yeah. However, I know Willis said he'd like to do a sixth one before being finished with the series for good. Enter Movie (talk) 04:28, 13 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Yeah, I know that Willis will like to do the sixth Die Hard film before he leaves the series for good. BattleshipMan (talk) 09:52, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

The Catchphrase for AGDTDH
I got it back because some other countries, US, have that catchphrase unedited and where it's at while other countries, including the UK, don't have that catchphrase. BattleshipMan (talk) 18:15, 15 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Yes, not only is the catchphrase not important in the plot, it's not even used in all versions. Aren't you agreeing with me? - Enter Movie (talk) 18:29, 15 March 2013 (UTC)


 * On second thought, I removed the catchphrase on AGDTDH since your right to a point. BattleshipMan (talk) 18:38, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Olympus Has Fallen and White House Down
BTW, what do you think of those two movies with a similar plot about the White House takeover, Olympus Has Fallen and White House Down, even though the trailer of the latter is yet to be seen? I think Olympus Has Fallen will be a better movie since it looks good, the cast looks good and director Antoine Fuqua at time can make good movies.

They did some movies with similar plots in the same year before. Dante's Peak and Volcano in 97. Deep Impact and Armageddon in 98. I guess they had a idea about two Die Hard in the White House movies in the same year and they came up with Olympus Has Fallen and White House Down. BattleshipMan (talk) 18:28, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of box office bombs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sahara (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Terminator (film), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Sarah Connor and Alan Taylor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Grandmaster Flash edits
Hello, while going through the links for the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame inductees, I noticed some links to the Hall of Fame that were listed as being published by Rolling Stone, and discovered that you had added them back in July 2009 in [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Grandmaster_Flash_and_the_Furious_Five_discography&diff=prev&oldid=301134616 edits like this] to Grandmaster Flash and the Furious Five discography. I know it was a long time ago, but do you remember what your intentions were with those edits? You also did the same thing with the main article about the group and their album The Message. Graham 87 09:12, 21 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Haha, wow. You're reaching far back, huh? lol. To be honest, I don't remember, but from the looks of it, that Rolling Stone web page (which is currently dead) probably had info about how high The Message album charted on the Billboard 200 or something. You can remove it if you like. My interest in the group and hip-hop music has fazed a bit since then. - Enter Movie (talk) 19:53, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

The Hills Have Eyes
I can see that you are very interested in horror films and I was wondering if you would like to review an article I nominated for GA: Wes Craven's The Hills Have Eyes. Thanks for your consideration!MagicatthemovieS (talk) 17:09, 5 October 2018 (UTC)MagicatthemovieS


 * Sorry, man, I'm not really a frequent editor. But from a quick skim, it looks great! Best of luck! Enter Movie (talk) 01:34, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Horrorfest
Template:Horrorfest has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. -- wooden superman  13:20, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

"Mortal Kombat (2010 film)" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Mortal Kombat (2010 film). The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 14 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. OcelotCreeper2 (talk) 00:39, 14 October 2021 (UTC)