User talk:EntirelyTrue

Speedy deletion nomination of The Huang Trap
Hello EntirelyTrue,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged The Huang Trap for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(talk)  04:26, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Possible Vandalism
Hi. I noticed you reverted my edit on Abuse of notation as "possible vandalism". It was not vandalism. I was removing an unsourced statement which has been tagged as possibly original research for four months, and which is at best poorly explained and at worst simply incorrect. Mr. Granger (talk) 22:30, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Re: revert to vanished user
That wasn't vandalism, I was blanking the talk page of a user who was renamed as part of Right to Vanish. Andrevan@ 22:57, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd.
Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd. took the "of" out of its name! Historically, it was "of" and now it isn't. I found it out a few minutes after creating the Imperial Tobacco of Canada Ltd. article. (Shemp Howard, Jr. (talk) 00:03, 26 December 2013 (UTC))

Barnstar
Hi there, I just came across a welcome message that include a barnstar just for joining wikipedia. I think it is a nice gesture but perhaps it does not meet the intended use and that it may encourage over-use as per barnstars. What do you think? ''' Flat Out   let's discuss it   10:36, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
 * As stated in my message, it should not encourage the over-use of barnstars, but to encourage them to edit with quality. You know, many people strive better with a little bit of head-start as well as encouragement. ;) EntirelyTrue (talk) 10:35, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

About redlinks
"Redlinked. Hence it shouldn't be linked." who said you that? Take a look at Red link, redlinks are often useful. My best, Cavarrone 10:52, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

As you no doubt expected, this account, like your previous accounts, has been blocked indefinitely from editing, because it is clear that you are not here to help build the encyclopaedia. You have used this account to evade blocks on other accounts, and you have posted totally fictitious claims to various pages, including re-creating a hoax page that has been deleted numerous times under various titles. Wikipedia is not a medium for publishing hoaxes or any other kind of fiction. If you believe there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 17:32, 26 December 2013 (UTC)