User talk:Entomologist2

Suggestion
I suggest using "show preview" (located next to "save page") as this will allow you to change your contributions before submitting. This will also prevent edit conflicts and exhausted servers. SwisterTwister  talk  03:10, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, but my mind doesn't work that way ... it is constantly chewing over and revising things ... Entomologist2 (talk) 03:30, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Maiestas vetus
Hello Entomologist2, I understand that all you want to do is to help, but now because of this edit Recilia vetus I can't find the actual page! If you wanted to change the name of the species you should have just put #REDIRECT Maiestas vetus, without species added. I wrote quite good article that is due to this edit is lost!--Mishae (talk) 22:38, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I think this is what you wanted? Maiestas vetus--Mishae (talk) 22:59, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Careful now
Personal attacks like this have no place on Wikipedia. As I'm sure you know, User:Stho002 was blocked indefinitely for intemperate language, and it's a shame you had to stoop to it here, particularly since your main point was a good one – that mass-produced substubs are not helpful here. In the past, I have actually tried to direct those editors who make them towards Wikispecies, but they always seem aggrieved by the suggestion. --Stemonitis (talk) 08:13, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Stemonitis, please stop reminding people of who, where and when got blocked, that wont solve anything. I personaly don't believe that he had a good point. To me his point was rather an insult. I got an award from Northamerica1000 for that mass production on February 24 of 2012, and now you guys gather here to critisise me?! For what did I got the award for?! I do personaly believe that Stemonitis was the one who told administrator Boing! said Zebedee to block User:Stho002 indefinitely because of user Stemonitis's temper. I personaly don't like people that take advantage of Personal Attacks rule to the extreme, instead of solving it civilly!--Mishae (talk) 17:14, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

A page you started (Sagola (genus)) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Sagola (genus), Entomologist2!

Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Please add text! A single Start class article can be more informative than a dozen stubs or taxoboxes. Cheers."

To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Speedy deletion nomination of Sagola (genus)
Hello Entomologist2,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Sagola (genus) for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Override Gamma (talk) 04:15, 12 January 2015 (UTC)