User talk:Envergure

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Gary King ( talk ) 15:25, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Duophony
Hi, Envergure. I'm just a bit confused by your description of duophony. Wouldn't it be more correct to say that a duophonic synthesizer can produce two different notes simultaneously, because it has two independent oscillators? - Richard Cavell (talk) 02:46, 7 December 2008 (UTC)


 * I'm not sure I understand the difference between your suggestion and the description I used. It you want to fine-tune the wording, go ahead.  I understand writing far less than I do synthesizers!  It just has to be clear that a duophonic synth is not actually polyphonic (ie. having multiple copies of the synthesis circuitry).  Now, this is the first page i've created.  Having started it, am I its sole moderator or something?  (just wondering 1. why you posted to my page instead of to talk:Duophony? and 2. why you tell me this instead if simply editing the page:)  Please don't ban me for beeing such a n00bEnvergure (talk) 03:03, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Maybe the problem is one of expression. I would say that a duophonic synthesizer is a polyphonic synthesizer that has only two oscillators. Perhaps the word 'polyphonic' should only be used, particularly in the present day, only to refer to those synths that can produce more than about 4 sounds at once.
 * You're not the page's moderator, but I wanted to talk to you about the page before messing with it. I posted here rather than the talk page because I noticed that you were new here, and wasn't sure if you would check the talk page. I'll make some edits and you tell me whether you like them. - Richard Cavell (talk) 03:06, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Funny - I was just tweaking it and when I hit "preview" your changes were there.
 * I think having "both" and "separately" together sounds awkward, but then I'm no English major. I think "independant" would be more accurate than "separate" because, although the oscillators can be pitched differently, they must sound simultaneously.  One oscillator may not sound alone, unless of course the circuitry's been hacked.

Speedy deletion nomination of Yakety Sax Makes Everything Funny


A tag has been placed on Yakety Sax Makes Everything Funny requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Singularity42 (talk) 01:14, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Fuzzy Wuzzy (poem)
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Shashwat986 (talk) 02:07, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Immediately stop reverting Polyphony (instrument) / Please stop advertisement
You were completely rewriting the article, but it require discussion and agreement.


 * Immediately stop reverting!

Note: Roland Jupiter-8 (1980/1981) is not notable on Polyphony (instrument), because it was historically not important (for other than Roland Corporation themselves), and slightly minor product (produced about 2,000).


 * Please stop advertisement.

--124.102.67.62 (talk) 00:06, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Punch capacitor for deletion
The article Punch capacitor is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Punch capacitor until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jrtayloriv (talk) 00:28, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Bridge driver?
If you have a reliable source for an H bridge being called a bridge driver, you need to add that to the article to support the new terminology. And you like to inverter was ambiguous (it linked to a disambig page); and you probably don't want that in the lead paragraph. Try again? Dicklyon (talk) 01:12, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi !  We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

--

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi !  We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

--