User talk:EnviroIsCool/sandbox

Review based on WikiEd Rubric 1.1 Introductory Sentence) Good. Article topic (climate change and agriculture) is clearly stated at the beginning of the introduction, but the topic of the specific edit proposed (effects of climate change on agriculture) is outlined throughout the intro. First sentence might be unnecessary and statement of this specific edit's topic first will clarify placement location within the existing page's intro. 1.2 Lead Summary) N/A contributing to existing article. 1.3 Lead Context) N/A contributing to existing article. 2.1 Organization) Excellent. The intro addition transitions well from the general interactions between agriculture and climate change to the direct effects on agriculture due to climate change. Livestock section is also well-organized and well-written. 2.2 Content) Good. Reorganization would help ensure the proposed edits would be added to the sections they are most relevant to. 2.3 Balance) Excellent. Proposed edits convey information in a balanced manner while focusing on the effects climatic changes have on agriculture. Also applies to proposed edits to livestock section. 2.4 Tone) Excellent. Tone is neutral and appropriate for an encyclopedia audience. 3.1 Citations) Excellent. Every factual statement can be associated with a supporting reference at the end of the sentence. Ensure this is the case even if the reference must be repeated. 3.2 Sources) Excellent. Most sources are scientifically reliable and appropriate for the genre. 3.3 Completeness) Excellent. All references include complete citations. 4.1 New Sections) Excellent. Make sure the info in the proposed edits is added to the appropriate sections to ensure there is no duplication of information. 4.2 Reorganization) Good. It's a bit unclear where the intro sections will be added into the original article as the page's intro is already partially written but the information is clearly communicated. This info could also potentially be added to the first subsection of the page: Impact of Climate Change on Agriculture. The livestock section will fit well into the existing page. 4.3 Gaps) Excellent. Key gaps are filled in the proposed edits, especially for the livestock section, but ensure the edits are organized to maximize addressing gaps where needed. 4.4 Smaller Additions) Good. Think about adding info for proposed edits to various sections of the existing article to maximize relevancy. 5.1 New Article Coverage) N/A contributing to existing article. 5.2 New Article Body) N/A contributing to existing article. Abicamp (talk) 04:14, 7 December 2020 (UTC)