User talk:Enwebb/Archive 1

A barnstar for you!

 * My first barnstar! Thank you :) Enwebb (talk) 15:15, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
Hi! Thank you for your message regarding Pavel Mitkov's page! I'll be fixing the parts that don't sound neutral. The 'excellent marks' were supposed to mean the highest in the Bulgaria, since here they are called "Excellent", but I'll fix it :) Same goes for the quality of the canvas. Thank you again :)

Justtryanother (talk) 06:20, 12 February 2018 (UTC) 

A barnstar for you!

 * Many thanks, ! Enwebb (talk) 19:52, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Indian flying fox
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Indian flying fox you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:01, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Indian flying fox
The article Indian flying fox you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Indian flying fox for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:41, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Great work on the Indian flying fox article!

 * Thank you for the hard work you put in as well! Enwebb (talk) 18:57, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Inland free-tailed bat
— Maile (talk) 00:02, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Honduran white bat
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Honduran white bat you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 00:02, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Honduran white bat
The article Honduran white bat you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Honduran white bat for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 13:21, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for your unending diligence in improving bat and bat-related articles!

 * Thank you! It's no more than those excellent animals deserve! Enwebb (talk) 17:09, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Underground Eiger
Hi User:Enwebb. Many thanks for you recent additions at Richard Stanton (cave rescue expert). A you may know, there is a version of "Underground Eiger" at YouTube uploaded by no less than Sid Perou. We can't link to it, of course, as it's almost certainly in beach of copyright. But I also remember watching that film as a youngster and being totally entranced and inspired. Maybe it's worth an article itself? (Even Sid has no article yet, alas). Martinevans123 (talk) 22:36, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
 * I actually have not seen Underground Eiger and did not realize it was on YouTube! I'd certainly be willing to help with both of those articles. I don't normally write about caves, but having wandered into the subject blindly, I find I rather like it down here! Enwebb (talk) 00:05, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
 * alright, The Underground Eiger exists but it could use some more sources, particularly some that assert its notability. Also, turns out it is freely available to watch, so I linked to it on the British Film Institute's website. Enwebb (talk) 04:23, 6 July 2018 (UTC)


 * p.s. am surprised I can find nothing about the molephone. I wonder where that might be lurking? Martinevans123 (talk) 20:57, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes, there definitely appears to be a gap on underground communications device. Perhaps worthy of a new section on Caving equipment? Caving equipment with a note on speleophones? A nice overview of such devices appears here (note that Gibson and others  spell it as "Molefone") Enwebb (talk) 21:09, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
 * A good idea. Well found. Martinevans123 (talk) 21:27, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Aaaand Sid Perou is live now too, though a little sparse . Enwebb (talk) 00:43, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Well done, Enwebb. Great work! Martinevans123 (talk) 08:40, 8 July 2018 (UTC) I wonder are you related to ArrWebb at all?
 * I'm a Yank and my Webb ancestors immigrated before 1800, so perhaps&mdash;but distantly! Enwebb (talk) 13:20, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Don't mind me I'm only browsing. Martinevans123 (talk) 13:24, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

cave radios
Hi. As far as I can tell, the Heyphone was designed to operate on the same LF frequency as the Molephone (87 kHz, not 79 kHz as I erroneously put in my summary but couldn't figure out how to change). But the upper end of VLF is much lower at 30 kHz so I'm very curious to know what radios actually operate down there. It seems difficult but perhaps not impossible to use voice at such low frequencies; for VLF submarine communications it's all low speed data. Karn (talk) 08:27, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Pteropus
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Pteropus you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:40, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Addition of cave rescue experts to "cave rescue" page
Hello Enwebb, just regarding your addition to the cave rescue page of Richard Stanton (and to which another user later added John Volanthen). I have opted to remove the line, as these are but two practitioners in the world of cave rescue. Notable as their achievements have been in Thailand, they would say themselves that it was simply part of their voluntary service, so no need to add them to an article covering the global concepts of cave rescue. If people want to look them up, they can find their respective pages on Wikipedia. Hope you don't mind! Fattonyni (talk) 11:52, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Pteropus
The article Pteropus you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Pteropus for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:41, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Pteropus
Hello! Your submission of Pteropus at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Kosack (talk) 18:14, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Proposed Deletion of Dan Dubeau
Hey, thanks for heads up. I understand your concern, and I just added a reference. No need to propose deletion yet. Thank you for being prompt on addressing me, though. It's always appreciated! Fhsig13 (talk) 03:25, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
 * just following procedures; thanks for addressing the issue quickly! Enwebb (talk) 03:33, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
 * No worries, I totally understand! Fhsig13 (talk) 03:34, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Morning. I just noticed that Dan Dubeau got deleted, but I can't figure out from where or by whom, or why for that matter. Not to point fingers, but I thought I'd just inquire with you to ensure that you didn't accidentally leave your request for deletion open, or if you happen to know what might've happened, since I can't find a discussion for it anywhere at WP:AfD Fhsig13 (talk) 17:57, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
 * it was on my watchlist, so I saw what happened. Someone (not sure because the page is deleted) tagged it as an WP:A7 stating that the article did not credibly state the notability of the subject . . . And then it was deleted by Ad Orientem. It's a subjective call. It was a pretty short article, if I remember, so maybe next attempt try to hammer down why the person is notable enough for an article. Good luck. Enwebb (talk) 19:48, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Thank you for looking into that for me. I have put in a request for deletion review, as I obviously can't request undeletion on it because it was a WP:A7 speedy-deletion. I also don't want to discuss it with Ad Orientem personally at this time, only because we just had an unrelated falling-out moments ago. If you'd like to share an opinion on it, the review case is here. Fhsig13 (talk) 20:21, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 23
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Beatrix's bat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Congo ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Beatrix%27s_bat check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Beatrix%27s_bat?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

I am working on my technique, thank you, open to advice and critique
Hello grammarian and PhD candidate Enwebb. You were exactly correct. The paragraph on Neil Swidey, who does brilliant, meaningful investigative journalism at the Boston Globe was "lifted" (not with any ill intention) straight from the Boston Globe's bio page. I am relatively new to Wikipedia editing (particularly in terms of drafting a "new article"). Your observation was spot on, so thanks :) Frankly, I am not even 100% certain I have left you this message in the correct manner! LG — Preceding unsigned comment added by LindseyGentile (talk • contribs) 21:57, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Not to be a new user pain (though I suppose everyone must navigate that stage) but I realize I neglected to close properlyLindseyGentile (talk) 22:01, 24 July 2018 (UTC) LindseyGentile (talk) 22:04, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Hello! I appreciate that you did not mean to plagiarize, but that is what happened. You are new here, so I would encourage you to read the core content policies of Wikipedia, which broadly outlays the policies we abide by on the site. You can also read the section on copyright violation here. I know it seems like there are a lot of rules around here, but you'll pick them up quickly if you stick around and aren't afraid to ask questions. You can find editors especially willing to help out at the Teahouse, though most anyone will help you if you ask. Enwebb (talk) 22:12, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for the advice -- especially about Teahouse. That way I will not have to solicit you each time I have a question :) I have been reading up on rules, and am really enjoying the collaborative wonder that is Wikipedia! LindseyGentile (talk) 14:41, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for your most recent feedback. I have always considered myself a good researcher, writer and academic, however....it has taken a month to get at all comfortable. I do appreciate your note of encouragement - and suspect those are less frequent than notes of admonishment on Wikipedia :) What a wonderful tool, resource, and source of enjoyment Wiki'ing - which I realize is likely "not a term" :) can "sometimes" be. LindseyGentile (talk) 00:17, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.12 30 July 2018
Hello, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

Overall the June backlog drive was a success, reducing the last 3,000 or so to below 500. However, as expected, 90% of the patrolling was done by less than 10% of reviewers. Since the drive closed, the backlog has begun to rise sharply again and is back up to nearly 1,400 already. Please help reduce this total and keep it from raising further by reviewing some articles each day.
 * June backlog drive


 * New technology, new rules
 * New features are shortly going to be added to the Special:NewPagesFeed which include a list of drafts for review, OTRS flags for COPYVIO, and more granular filter preferences. More details can be found at this page.
 * Probationary permissions: Now that PERM has been configured to allow expiry dates to all minor user rights, new NPR flag holders may sometimes be limited in the first instance to 6 months during which their work will be assessed for both quality and quantity of their reviews. This will allow admins to accord the right in borderline cases rather than make a flat out rejection.
 * Current reviewers who have had the flag for longer than 6 months but have not used the permissions since they were granted will have the flag removed, but may still request to have it granted again in the future, subject to the same probationary period, if they wish to become an active reviewer.


 * Editathons
 * Editathons will continue through August. Please be gentle with new pages that obviously come from good faith participants, especially articles from developing economies and ones about female subjects. Consider using the 'move to draft' tool rather than bluntly tagging articles that may have potential but which cannot yet reside in mainspace.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. —  Insertcleverphrasehere (or here)  00:00, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
 * The Signpost
 * The next issue of the monthly magazine will be out soon. The newspaper is an excellent way to stay up to date with news and new developments between our newsletters. If you have special messages to be published, or if you would like to submit an article (one about NPR perhaps?), don't hesitate to contact the editorial team here.

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Thanks for reviewing Harry Tachian, Enwebb.

Unfortunately Barkeep49 has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

"Hi there. The page does not establish that Tachian is notable (owning a notable sports team doesn't mean he's notable - WP:INHERIT). A WP:BEFORE also didn't have me come with anything suggesting he meets a SNG, ANYBIO, or GNG. I am redirecting to the Football Club."

To reply, leave a comment on Barkeep49's talk page.

Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 23:00, 8 August 2018 (UTC)


 * thank you for your feedback! I will keep that in mind as I review pages in the future. I had thought that the subject may have met the GNG with the coverage I was seeing  but I can see now that the article itself was perhaps lacking in expressing that. Enwebb (talk) 01:13, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Hey there. So I would suggest that neither of those sources are RS as they both look more like WordPress blogs than truly professional w websites with editorial controls that would make them RS. Even if they were generally RS, ISN is posting a press release (they even link to it at the bottom) and Front Row is really about the team not Tachian and that kind of coverage is why I redirected to the club which does seem to pass GNG. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 01:18, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Spectral bat
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Spectral bat you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dunkleosteus77 -- Dunkleosteus77 (talk) 23:01, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Spectral bat
The article Spectral bat you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Spectral bat for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dunkleosteus77 -- Dunkleosteus77 (talk) 20:22, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Authority parentheses
Hi Enwebb, why have you removed parentheses from authorities for Paratriaenops species originally described as Triaenops species? Similarly, why are there no parentheses around the authority for Vampyrum spectrum (originally Vespertilio spectrum)? Thanks, WolfmanSF (talk) 05:23, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi, I'd be happy to see the policy that says that parentheses around authority are expected. As I've been processing the bat stubs, I've noticed it's about half and half whether parentheses are used are not. I'm making it consistent by not having parentheses. Enwebb (talk) 05:28, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
 * I see now what you're talking about Template:Taxobox. I'll keep an eye out in the future. Enwebb (talk) 05:33, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Author citation (zoology) pretty much covers it. Plant conventions differ, if you ever work in that area. WolfmanSF (talk) 07:49, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Pteropus
Gatoclass (talk) 00:12, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

Freddie Oversteegen
Nice job on creating that page. It's incredible that it was not already there!ThatMontrealIP (talk) 14:59, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
 * I was equally astonished! Thanks for taking the time to leave a message&mdash;it's appreciated! Enwebb (talk) 15:05, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.13 18 September 2018
Hello, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

The New Page Feed currently has 2700 unreviewed articles, up from just 500 at the start of July. For a while we were falling behind by an average of about 40 articles per day, but we have stabilised more recently. Please review some articles from the back of the queue if you can (Sort by: 'Oldest' at Special:NewPagesFeed), as we are very close to having articles older than one month.


 * Project news
 * The New Page Feed now has a new "Articles for Creation" option which will show drafts instead of articles in the feed, this shouldn't impact NPP activities and is part of the WMF's AfC Improvement Project.
 * As part of this project, the feed will have some larger updates to functionality next month. Specifically, ORES predictions will be built in, which will automatically flag articles for potential issues such as vandalism or spam. Copyright violation detection will also be added to the new page feed. See the projects's talk page for more info.


 * There are a number of coordination tasks for New Page Patrol that could use some help from experienced reviewers. See New pages patrol/Coordination for more info to see if you can help out.


 * Other
 * A new summary page of reliable sources has been created; Identifying reliable sources/Perennial sources, which summarizes existing RfCs or RSN discussions about regularly used sources.


 * Moving to Draft and Page Mover
 * Some unsuitable new articles can be best reviewed by moving them to the draft space, but reviewers need to do this carefully and sparingly. It is most useful for topics that look like they might have promise, but where the article as written would be unlikely to survive AfD. If the article can be easily fixed, or if the only issue is a lack of sourcing that is easily accessible, tagging or adding sources yourself is preferable. If sources do not appear to be available and the topic does not appear to be notable, tagging for deletion is preferable (PROD/AfD/CSD as appropriate). See additional guidance at WP:DRAFTIFY.
 * If the user moves the draft back to mainspace, or recreates it in mainspace, please do not re-draftify the article (although swapping it to maintain the page history may be advisable in the case of copy-paste moves). AfC is optional except for editors with a clear conflict of interest.
 * Articles that have been created in contravention of our paid-editing-requirements or written from a blatant NPOV perspective, or by authors with a clear COI might also be draftified at discretion.
 * The best tool for draftification is User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js(info). Kindly adapt the text in the dialogue-pop-up as necessary (the default can also be changed like this). Note that if you do not have the Page Mover userright, the redirect from main will be automatically tagged as CSD R2, but in some cases it might be better to make this a redirect to a different page instead.
 * The Page Mover userright can be useful for New Page Reviewers; occasionally page swapping is needed during NPR activities, and it helps avoid excessive R2 nominations which must be processed by admins. Note that the Page Mover userright has higher requirements than the NPR userright, and is generally given to users active at Requested Moves. Only reviewers who are very experienced and are also very active reviewers are likely to be granted it solely for NPP activities.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:11, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.14 21 October 2018
Hello, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

, there are 3650 unreviewed articles and the backlog now stretches back 51 days.
 * Backlog


 * Community Wishlist Proposal
 * There is currently an ongoing discussion regarding the drafting of a Community Wishlist Proposal for the purpose of requesting bug fixes and missing/useful features to be added to the New Page Feed and Curation Toolbar.
 * Please join the conversation as we only have until 29 October to draft this proposal!


 * Project updates
 * ORES predictions are now built-in to the feed. These automatically predict the class of an article as well as whether it may be spam, vandalism, or an attack page, and can be filtered by these criteria now allowing reviewers to better target articles that they prefer to review.
 * There are now tools being tested to automatically detect copyright violations in the feed. This detector may not be accurate all the time, though, so it shouldn't be relied on 100% and will only start working on new revisions to pages, not older pages in the backlog.


 * New scripts
 * User:Enterprisey/cv-revdel.js(info) — A new script created for quickly placing copyvio-revdel on a page.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. —  Insertcleverphrasehere (or here)  20:49, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.15 16 November 2018
Hello ,
 * Community Wishlist Survey – NPP needs you – Vote NOW
 * Community Wishlist Voting takes place 16 to 30 November for the Page Curation and New Pages Feed improvements, and other software requests. The NPP community is hoping for a good turnout in support of the requests to Santa for the tools we need. This is very important as we have been asking the Foundation for these upgrades for 4 years.


 * If this proposal does not make it into the top ten, it is likely that the tools will be given no support at all for the foreseeable future. So please put in a vote today.


 * We are counting on significant support not only from our own ranks, but from everyone who is concerned with maintaining a Wikipedia that is free of vandalism, promotion, flagrant financial exploitation and other pollution.


 * With all 650 reviewers voting for these urgently needed improvements, our requests would be unlikely to fail. See also The Signpost Special report: 'NPP: This could be heaven or this could be hell for new users – and for the reviewers', and if you are not sure what the wish list is all about, take a sneak peek at an article in this month's upcoming issue of The Signpost which unfortunately due to staff holidays and an impending US holiday will probably not be published until after voting has closed.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. —  Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 18:37, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

Great work on the Little Brown Bat article!

 * no worries, and thanks! Always open to collaborating in the future (though maybe not another GA for a few months, phew!). Enwebb (talk) 19:07, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

White wagtail
You are reviewing this article. I think I have done most of the changes, though I am not sure. Qwerty number1 (talk) 15:13, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

Have, again, done most of the tasks. However, I am unsure about how to sort out the bare refs. Can you help me understand how to do this? Thanks, your effort with this is really appreciated, Qwerty number1 (talk) 21:20, 2 December 2018 (UTC)!
 * so what I mean by fixing the bare URL is providing more information than just the URL. Right now, for example, the IUCN ref looks like this

.

There's no information about the page. When you cite the IUCN, you cite it as a journal. The IUCN is nice because when you go to the page, all the citation information is listed at the top. So what the reference should look like is this:

which gives you something like this in the references section instead of just the URL:

Hope that helps! Enwebb (talk) 02:03, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

I am afraid I may be unable to say what medieval writer(s) made the mistake since I do not have the book the reference referred to. Sorry, Qwerty number1 (talk) 17:49, 3 December 2018 (UTC) Have removed gallery,assuggested!Qwerty number1 (talk) 18:12, 4 December 2018 (UTC) Is there any icon one needs to add to the page? Thanks, Qwerty number1 (talk) 17:21, 5 December 2018 (UTC)! Wut!? A notification says it is not a good article, but the review page says it is!? Qwerty number1 (talk) 17:24, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
 * not sure why that happened? I passed the review. I wouldn't worry about it too much. Enwebb (talk) 02:20, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Little brown bat
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Little brown bat you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dunkleosteus77 -- Dunkleosteus77 (talk) 21:20, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Little brown bat
The article Little brown bat you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Little brown bat for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dunkleosteus77 -- Dunkleosteus77 (talk) 19:41, 13 December 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.16 15 December 2018
Hello ,

This year's award for the Reviewer of the Year goes to. Around on Wikipedia since 2011, their staggering number of 26,554reviews over the past twelve months makes them, together with an additional total of 275,285edits, one of Wikipedia's most prolific users.
 * Reviewer of the Year
 * Thanks are also extended for their work to (15,059 reviews),  (12,760reviews),  (9,001reviews),  (8,440reviews),  (8,092reviews),   (5,306reviews),  (4,153 reviews),  (4,016reviews),  and  (3,615reviews)., , , and  have been New Page Reviewers for less than a year — Barkeep49 for only sevenmonths, while , with an edit count of 250,000 since she joined Wikipedia in 2008, has been a bastion of New Page Patrol for many years.

See also the list of top100 reviewers.

The backlog is now approaching 5,000, and still rising. There are around 640holders of the NPR flag, most of whom appear to be inactive. The 10% of the reviewers who do 90% of the work could do with some support especially as some of them are now taking a well deserved break.
 * Less good news, and an appeal for some help

At #1 position, the Community Wishlist poll closed on 3December with a resounding success for NPP, reminding the WMF and the volunteer communities just how critical NPP is to maintaining a clean encyclopedia and the need for improved tools to do it. A big 'thank you' to everyone who supported the NPP proposals. See the results.
 * Really good news - NPR wins the Community Wishlist Survey 2019

Due to a number of changes having been made to the feed since this three-minutevideo was created, we have been asked by the WMF for feedback on the video with a view to getting it brought up to date to reflect the new features of the system. Please leave your comments here, particularly mentioning how helpful you find it for new reviewers. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:14, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Training video

Happy (belated) Christmas!
I was on holiday in Singapore since December 18th until yesterday, and did not have a chance to send you a message earlier! J ACKINTHE  B  OX   • TALK 07:27, 27 December 2018 (UTC)