User talk:Eobasanya

Welcome!
Hello, Eobasanya, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Artificial intelligence. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Mirokado (talk) 21:50, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Artificial intelligence
Hi. I'm afraid I am not going to accept your edits to Artificial intelligence as they stand, but I don't want to discourage you so I will explain why here. Please also try to improve your grammar when making long additions. We don't generally mind tweaking the odd error, but what you have written here would in any case need to be rewritten, but I'm not going to try to do that when there are also other problems. If English is not your first language, you may need to learn a bit more before making such long updates. --Mirokado (talk) 22:08, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The first edit makes an extraordinary claim that "the most popular parameters for what it means to have AI is “autonomy” ". Extraordinary means that we must say who said this in the article text and immediately follow it by a full (e.g. book with page number) reference.
 * The second edit may be OK, if so I will restore it later.
 * The third edit is too detailed for this overview article. You could check the linked article to see whether it describes perceptron fully and accurately. Perceptron is already linked in the current content.

And fairly quickly, an update! Your second edit added citations for the first edit. Well done! However, you did not complete any edit summaries to explain what you were doing, so I did not connect the two edits in my initial inspection. Please always explain what you are doing in the edit summaries. Looking at the first two edits together, it seems that they are talking too much about one researcher's (Alterman's) work for this top-level summary. In any case, the content is sourced to an article by Alterman himself rather than a state-of-the-art review article. So even after a second look I would not support this addition. You could open a section on Talk:Artificial intelligence if you wish to discuss this further. --Mirokado (talk) 22:21, 10 March 2015 (UTC)