User talk:Eoc46/Federal government of Nigeria

Peer Review
Lead: Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? yes Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? yes Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? yes Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? yes Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? concise Lead evaluation: great, informative

Content: Is the content added relevant to the topic? yes Is the content added up-to-date? yes Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? no Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? yes Content evaluation: great addition of contemporary and more specific information

Tone and Balance: Is the content added neutral? yes Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? no Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? no Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? no Tone and balance evaluation: great neutral presentation of facts

Sources and References: Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? yes Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? yes Are the sources current? yes Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? yes, yes Check a few links. Do they work? yes Sources and references evaluation: great and diverse!

Organization: Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? yes! very easy to follow Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? no Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? yes Organization evaluation: great! makes the page very easy to follow! Images and Media Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media

Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? yes What are the strengths of the content added? more specific How can the content added be improved? continuing to add more information or images Overall evaluation: love it! great addition to existing page! PSCI2237 (talk) 05:00, 14 November 2020 (UTC)