User talk:Epaukner/Evaluate an Article

Name of article: Multiple Sclerosis

The article's topic was closely related to the courses subject matter.

Lead

The lead properly previews the sections. Content is accurate and concise.

Lead evaluation Content

This article uses a wide variety of sources, from as early as 1919 and as recent as 2018. The content of each section is relevant to the topic as a whole. The content is clear and concise. The vocabulary is simple enough for the average person to understand, and there are plenty of links for further readings about unfamiliar diseases or terms.

Content evaluation Tone and Balance

The tone of this article is neutral.

Tone and balance evaluation Sources and References

The article has citations attributed to academic papers for nearly ever sentence in the article.

Sources and references evaluation Organization

The organization of the article is logical, and there is no obvious spelling or grammatical mistakes.

Organization evaluation Images and Media

Pictures are appropriate to the content. They are appropriately cited.

Images and media evaluation Checking the talk page

The talk page is quite full of discussions, mentioning things from recent research to comments on wording. This article is part of many wiki-projects and is rated as top or high importance. This is a featured article and was rated one of the best articles on wikipedia.

Talk page evaluation Overall impressions

This article is both very well done and very active. New research is being added and the content is comprehensive. Terminology, for the most part, is able to be understood by the average person. Sources are properly cited and are unbiased.

Overall evaluation Optional activity Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback with four tildes Epaukner (talk) 20:14, 11 September 2019 (UTC) Link to feedback: Epaukner (talk) 20:14, 11 September 2019 (UTC)