User talk:Epbr123/Archive 5

Deletion of the Dene Lincoln article, September 2008
Hi there. Could I see please the content of this article as to why there was an A1 reason to delete? I would like to contribute to this page, if necessary by giving it contextual relevance. thanks, Jamesmrturner (talk) 14:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The entire content was "Performed there in 1960 with the Moonrakers". Epbr123 (talk) 15:20, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Kannada literature in the Western Chalukya Empire
Hi. Do you have the time to do a thorough copy edit of my PR article. Thanks,Dineshkannambadi (talk) 20:51, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi. I noticed you had started copy edits on this article. Please continue doing do, if you have time. Dan55 has become busy with other articles and wont be able to help me on this one. If you are busy but know someone who is good at this, please do let me know, or invite that user yourself. The users who are currently helping with PR are Moni3 and Sundar.thanks,Dineshkannambadi (talk) 23:04, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Luke Ford
Could you point me in the direction of the vilification of the Luke Ford sources? Dismas |(talk) 08:26, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * At Articles for deletion/Ginger Jolie, Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Ginger Jolie and User talk:Jimbo Wales/Archive 147. Epbr123 (talk) 08:32, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Dismas |(talk) 08:37, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Kate Nash/Personal Attacks
I noticed you left a note on talk page of 68.9.95.118. This user is repeatedly vandalising the Kate Nash page by incorrectly claiming she is Irish born (the user is Irish themself despite a US based IP address....). I just noticed they left this message on an old talk page 'Fuck Off you British Cunt !!!'. This user doesn't appear to make an constructive edits, and is throwing about personal insults.... surely a ban should be in place here?

92.9.66.126 (talk) 20:29, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I've left them a final warning. However, as it's an IP address they would only be able to be blocked temporarily, and only for a short period at first. Epbr123 (talk) 20:52, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Good job on the Huggling
Just wanted to let you know it is appreciated. You've got at least two fans now. :P &mdash; neuro(talk) 00:26, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I came here just to say the same thing. Great job,  Spencer T♦C 00:26, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Whoa!!! [This Is Good]
Not that I'm complaining that vandals are getting reverted, but the one night in months I find time to patrol, you beat me to half the edits. I guess this slow computer and questionable Wi-Fi connection aren't quite adequate for Huggle. :D Keep it up, though; you're doing an awesome job! Tuvok[T@lk/Improve] 00:36, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Angelica Bella
Finally found a RS for Angelica Bella's 1993 Hot D'Or award. Hopefully, that will stop the rounds of deletions. For future european pornography topics, I wish AVN Europe (based in Budapest) was archived and searchable like the original but it's only available in the PDF of the month so far. Morbidthoughts (talk) 20:26, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I didn't know there was AVN Europe. It looks like an excellent source for redressing Wikipedia's American bias. Shame about its searchability though. Epbr123 (talk) 21:41, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Request
Hi there. I have seen that you are a part of this wiki project. I was wondering whether you can add an article about the actor John West. According to IMDB he has appeared in nearly 700 movies and there is another site here which has information on him. He has also won 1 award and was nominated for another. I am surprised he does not feature on the wikipedia and i think its about time he does. Hopefully you can help me out. 115.128.12.163 (talk) 04:40, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Just to let you know
Now that Huggle does not block editors (look at the talk page), it might be a good idea to look at your logs when on patrol to see the editors you have reported to AIV and block them yourself to save other admins the time. Just a suggestion. Best  Monster Under Your Bed  (talk) 13:05, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism
im sorry i dont know who is doing this. but for some reason it keeps sending messages to my adress. what do i do? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.128.184.110 (talk) 17:16, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Vandalism is being done by someone using the same shared IP address as you. The best way to avoid receiving these messages or being blocked is by creating an account for yourself. Epbr123 (talk) 17:22, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

What the...?
This explains the title. :-) SchfiftyThree  (talk!) 00:10, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism
How are my edits to Xandir vandalism? --134.241.28.252 (talk) 16:09, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Lincolnshire, Illinois for Peer Review
Hello, Epbr; I recall I called you to the task before. If you have the time, can you look over the article? It has just passed GA, and I could really use the feedback.

Please get back to me as soon as you can.

Thanks, --Starstriker7(Dime algoor see my works) 04:05, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Smile


Andy (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

You always keep beating me to the vandals! Ha, ha! Andy (talk) 19:48, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

LA Direct Models
I removed them because they weren't particularly relevant news links related to the company. If they were references for particular statements in the article (e.g. important events in the history of the company), it would be another story, but they appear to be there just to show that the company exists or something. Any corporation will generate some amount of news over time, not all of it deserves to be linked in Wikipedia articles. --Boffob (talk) 22:34, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
 * No assertion of notability; just another "modeling agency" for the industry. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  02:11, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

Sternenfels
Hi Epbr123, as you're mentioned on the volunteers list for geography, would you please be so kind to have a look on Sternenfels? I have done some update work and need an native speaker for furrther improvement. BR --Polentario (talk) 00:40, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

a question?
I have an inquiry, what is the lower age limit for being accepted as an admin here on wikipedia? I ask as there seem to be a lot of school kids, ie, those under the age of 18, who are admins. They seem to delete, ban, block, edit wikipedia at times when they do not l ike an certtain article.

This seems fairly unique as most sites will not allow anyone to be and admin, sysop, modderator unless they are 18 or over. Please reply here as my IP address changes as and when I log onto the Internet79.74.24.142 (talk) 19:33, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Anyone trusted to delete and block responsibly is accepted as an admin, regardless of age. Epbr123 (talk) 19:36, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

talk page cleanup
Thanks for cleaning up my talk archives by deleting all those pages for me. :) Cheers! Esrever (klaT) 20:37, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Delined speedy of Kerem Mete Ozmen
This article has already been deleted by AfD. See Articles for deletion/Kerem mete ozmen. CSD G4 should apply. McWomble (talk) 08:21, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

User:Sylis9 warnings
Hey, I thought you'd want to know Sylis9 has vandalized another page. I was going to put a warning on the user's talk page but saw the other warnings you already gave. I figured it'd look silly having a vandal2 warning posted under a vandal4im warning, and thought you should be made aware of this new vandalism. (Guyinblack25 talk 20:17, 7 November 2008 (UTC))
 * Thanks, I've blocked them. Epbr123 (talk) 20:22, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Repeat vandal
User 65.96.197.124 seems to have done nothing but vandalize in their entire time here (see the repeated warnings on their talk page); I realize an IP address can only be able to be blocked temporarily, but maybe it's time to do that again? Languagehat (talk) 21:08, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
 * They did actually make an apparently constructive edit yesterday, so I'm hesitant to block just yet, but I'll keep an eye on them. Epbr123 (talk) 21:56, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Bad words
Hi! You've had some success at editing User:Lupin/badwords. I tried to add some more words in Hindi, (details: User talk:Lupin/badwords) but the system is preventing my save. Do you know what to do? =Nichalp  «Talk»=  08:00, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks! =Nichalp   «Talk»=  16:20, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

Zig-Zag Island
It's not software, it's a company. Schuy m 1 ( talk ) 13:05, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I misread. Epbr123 (talk) 13:09, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

W. G. Grace/Archive 1
Hello. Yes, thanks, I'd like this one deleted because it was created by accident when the server went down just as I was trying to set up a talk page archive. I created the other after someone tried to speedy delete this, which could have meant loss of the archive. I've got the original talk page pointing to the second page so that's the one to keep. Much appreciated. ---BlackJack | talk page 19:35, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Should this be worrying anyone?
User:Flewis seems to be creating a lot of secondary accounts. I have no choice to assume good faith; he's certainly not a vandal and there may be a perfectly legitimate reason, but that's a bit...odd. Of course I freely admit I may be reading this wrong. Half Shadow  21:59, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I think he helps out with creating accounts for blocked IPs. He applied for the tool used to do it here. Epbr123 (talk) 22:09, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh, there's a tool for that? Fair enough; my mistake. Half  Shadow  22:11, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Keon Lattimore Vandalism from HughesNet IP Addresses
I'm not altogether sure what idiot using HughesNet is vandalizing pages from the IP I'm currently sharing, but I apologize on his or her behalf. I should probably log in to my actual account on the secure server now, eh? via 97.73.64.155 (talk) 00:45, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

2008 World Series
Well done with the Rays fan vandal. As is my habit, I usually check the location of IP vandals to baseball articles to see if they are fans of opposition teams; by the time I came back, he was already blocked! Kudos!
 * Thanks. Epbr123 (talk) 02:26, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of LA Direct Models
An article that you have been involved in editing, LA Direct Models, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/LA Direct Models. Thank you. Eluchil404 (talk) 04:40, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Excuse me,but please leave this IP address alone. It's a school computer,a and several people use just one computer. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.184.36.129 (talk) 17:11, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

AIV reports
Block your own vandals, darn you. :P Glass  Cobra  19:54, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

:/
Why are you making reports to AIV? Did you resign adminship?  Master&amp;  Expert ( Talk ) 23:28, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
 * No, it's just that Huggle's block feature is broken, so it is easier to file reports to AIV and let someone else deal with it than it is to minimize Huggle, open a browser, and block using the MediaWiki Special:BlockIP. J.delanoy gabs adds  23:35, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah, it's more efficient to let the AIV watchers block at the moment. I could revert about 10 vandals in the time it takes to block someone. Epbr123 (talk) 23:37, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Really? But what about the manual block feature?  Master&amp;  Expert ( Talk ) 19:07, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I can block manually, but it takes a lot of time. It's better if I continue to revert vandals, and let others block, due to the division of labour benefits. Epbr123 (talk) 19:55, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Ahh... but wouldn't it take just as long for another administrator to administer a block?  Master&amp;  Expert ( Talk ) 00:38, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
 * No, because the other administrator wouldn't have to spend time switching between different tasks. They would just be focussing on blocking. Epbr123 (talk) 01:08, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Ryanair accident
As you may be aware, there was an accident to a Ryanair flight at Rome Ciampino Airport yesterday. The aircraft involved was substantially damaged and there is much coverage in the press. User:Harry the Dirty Dog keeps removing any reference to the accident from the Ryanair article claiming it is not notable. The section is headed "Accidents and incidents" - I believe that it was an accident rather than an incident. Is there a WP:OWN issue here? Mjroots (talk) 18:49, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
 * If he starts reverting against consensus, then there may be an WP:OWN issue. But there doesn't seem to be consensus on the article talk page yet. I don't know enough about the incident yet to give an opinion on whether it belongs in the article. Maybe there should be an article on "Ryanair accidents and incidents" to include these kinds of minor incidents. Epbr123 (talk) 20:14, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

MOS guru
Am I correct in remembering that has referred to you as the MOS guru? I certainly need one! and I are preparing Reception history of Jane Austen for FAC. I have this feeling that Austen articles might generate some interest at FAC, so I want to check every single dash and ellipse before we nominate. I want to try and make sure that the nomination goes smoothly! If you could help us out, we would really appreciate it - there is no rush at all, btw. Whenever you have time. Best to do this whole thing right the first time! Awadewit (talk) 22:42, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Yep, this is the place :-) Sandy Georgia  (Talk) 22:43, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks, And in retrospect, it probably was unconstructive... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hellookitty123 (talk • contribs) 16:25, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

My article
Hi, a few days ago(or weeks, can't remember...) you have deleted my article which is called Illutia due to speedy deletion. I have asked the administrator why it was deleted and they said that you deleted it yourself. They also said that they declined the deletion but it was re-tagged for deletion despite their decision. Could you please explain to me why you deleted the article? Sinjid40 (talk) 11:24, 16 November 2008 (UTC) But what if the only sources that I have is from my own experience? I mean I can't find any sources for that article on any websites, since this game(article) is rather unpopular and in no way will the Staff of the game will give away game information. I am(apparently) the only person that tried to make an article for that, so I don't think anyone else would come and improve it. I've seen many articles that have been tagged for not having any sources yet they don't get deleted. How come? Sinjid40 (talk) 03:58, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * It was an article about web content that didn't indicate the importance or significance of its subject. You need to establish the notabilty of the subject by finding reliable, independent, significant sources for its article. Epbr123 (talk) 11:48, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * If you can't find any independent sources, then the game isn't notable. All articles that can't be sourced do get deleted eventually. Epbr123 (talk) 10:34, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

the pornbio discussion
Is there something you can do when a poster splices another user's post with his responses. This seems to be refactoring (although not in bad faith) and confuses the hell out of me as it makes it more difficult to follow the conversation because I can't attribute who posted what. Imagine someone new to the discussion that has to read that. Morbidthoughts (talk) 02:07, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I've removed his comments, which I think is justified as they altered someone else's comments. Epbr123 (talk) 11:17, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Wow
You've beaten me to every rollback so far! NOT FAIR! :'( :P Cheers.  Im per a t § r (Talk) 14:04, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Amber Lynn
I've been in touch with the subject of the article and the content you removed without discussion was material she approved of and added to the article. I am working with her to obtain sources for any content that is challenged per WP:V. There have been two or three WP:OTRS submissions by Amber, proving that she is involved with the article and willing to work with us on content and sources for her article. Dreadstar †  20:06, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
 * There are severe Autobiography problems with this. It's been 8 months since you last added a source to the article. Epbr123 (talk) 20:12, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Please discuss your issues on Talk:Amber Lynn then. Dreadstar  †  20:22, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
 * We seem to have different interpretations of WP:BLP, so I think the place to discuss this is at Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard. Epbr123 (talk) 20:48, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Image:Westgate.jpg
Hi. The image above has been tagged with the text copyvio template. The contributor who tagged it notes that "Flickr, licensed as "All Rights Reserved" which is not a free license." Has the photographer changed his license? Ordinarily, I'd move an image listed at WP:CP to PUI for investigation, since we don't handle images there, but given that you were the initial uploader here thought I'd bring the matter to your attention. :) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 00:34, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I uploaded it about 18 months ago, so I can't remember for sure what's happened, but it's probable the photographer changed the license. It looks like it should be deleted now anyway. Epbr123 (talk) 00:58, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I figured that was probably what happened, but thought I'd better check in case it was released elsewhere. (Personally, I have trouble remembering 18 days ago. :D) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 01:02, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

Speedy declined
Hey there... regarding João Sousa Valles, you declined the speedy tag, stating that the article contains assertions of notability... Can you take another look? It's pretty much a straight A7 fictional "autobio" that is even worse because it was machine-translated. Lemme know what you think - if you still think it's non-speedyable, I'll start an AfD. Tan  &#124;   39  16:17, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Parts of the article looks like a hoax, but a Google search shows there is a possibly notable photographer of the same name. I can't decide, so I'll leave the decision to you. Epbr123 (talk) 17:46, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

RfA thanks
design by neurolysis | to add this barnstar to your awards page, simply copy and paste and remove this bottom text | if you don't like thankspam, please accept my sincere apologies

The You Anti-Vandalism Barnstar

Need your help
Hi! Please block User talk:142.242.34.248. Thank you. Oda Mari (talk) 19:31, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm afraid he doesn't look like a vandal to me. It seems like he's genuinely trying to improve the article. You'll need to converse with him if you disagree with his edits. Epbr123 (talk) 19:41, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I see. Regards. Oda Mari (talk) 19:46, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

Seriously
I couldn't read the page at all. Do we need obscure russian pronounciation tips for an online encyclopedia? Thanks.

Ellen Page Revision
I just got a message from you about some sort of page revision. I have never edited Wikipedia, well now I have. Perhaps you sent it to the wrong person? Not sure how to sign this. Maybe this will link to the message?
 * The edit was probably made by someone sharing the same IP address as you. Epbr123 (talk) 00:52, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism by Froglegs2011
Hi there - I see you placed a warning notice recently on the talkpage of User:Froglegs2011. This user just vandalised a user talkpage. I reverted the edit but don't know how to warn the user again - maybe you could let me know, or take a look yourself? Cheers. Gonzonoir (talk) 21:23, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I've warned them. There's a list of warning templates at Template messages/User talk namespace. Epbr123 (talk) 21:35, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks Epbr123. Gonzonoir (talk) 10:25, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for your careful consideration at my successful RfA. Please let me know on my talk page if you have any suggestions for me. - Dan Dank55 (send/receive) 22:14, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Belotte Francoeur
In a strange twist of oddity, I believe I marked this page for speedy deletion at about the exact same time that you deleted it, causing the page to be created a second time. So, I just wanted to apologize for making you delete the page twice. Cheers! Scapler (talk) 19:25, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
 * That's fine. I thought that's what had happened. Epbr123 (talk) 19:28, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

December 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Scarface (1983 film) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. -Unpopular Opinion (talk · contribs) 14:29, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I think WP:DTTR applies here. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  14:47, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

False accusation
Please don't accuse me of vandalism - I've got nothing to do with the vandalism that you linked to. 194.72.9.25 (talk) 14:40, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

Huggle / warning@aiv v. blocking
Hiya. Didn't know if you knew this or not, but huggle is actually able to block people if you're an admin (as opposed to simply reporting them to AIV despite being an admin). Anyway, as always, thanks for kicking some vandal butt, and cheers =) -- slakr  \ talk / 15:30, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

Deletion of Pat Tice
I'm actually putting together a Wiki page based on a personal friend of mine for a school project at MSU. I don't expect many (if any) hits on the page, and I plan on deleting it after I get graded for it. I would Appreciate you restoring the article PAT TICE so i can continue working on it. Sincerely, Jayflojo —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jayflojo (talk • contribs) 12:19, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm afraid not. Wikipedia isn't meant to be used for this purpose. Epbr123 (talk) 12:34, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism on Wikipage "spoon"
But spoon is from hong kong and enjoys recreational sex with sheep! Its a fact!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.38.150.86 (talk) 20:44, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Bethan Probert
Hi, this article has just been recreated for the third time, despite my warning the editor to stop doing this. Please help!-- Myosotis Scorpioides  01:04, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

Unreliable narrator
Can you please take a look at this, and perhaps ask the anonymous editor to tone it down a bit? Thanks. ---  RepublicanJacobite  The'FortyFive' 03:00, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you. ---  RepublicanJacobite  The'FortyFive' 03:14, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * He has apparently not gotten the point. ---  RepublicanJacobite  The'FortyFive' 04:26, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

What the hell? Why did my page get deleted This is bullshit

Gol 1907
Hi Epbr123, I am trying to get this article to FA status, and have been informed that you are one of the top experts on MOS for FA articles. Would you mind having a look at it when you have some free time? Thanks in advance, Crum375 (talk) 16:29, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I've done a cleanup, but there's a couple of things you'll still need to do:
 * Per MOS:IMAGE, you should avoid sandwiching text between two images that face each other. There's also a lot of whitespace, caused by the images, in certain browser settings. You'll possibly need to remove some images to fix these two issues.:
 * The refs need to be consitntly formatted, particularly the dates. Epbr123 (talk) 11:48, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for all your help, Epbr123! I am not so keen about removing images &mdash; I much prefer to keep what we have, and would love to get more, if there were good ones out there. But I'll keep your points in mind and see what I can do. I'll also work on the other items you mention. Thanks again, Crum375 (talk) 13:16, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

School IP needs another permanent soft block
Take a look at 66.244.123.107 again. Won't you do what you did before, but for a lot longer? Thanks. S B Harris 05:52, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I've blocked them for 3 months. Epbr123 (talk) 10:55, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Greetings
Best wishes for the coming new year!Dineshkannambadi (talk) 19:46, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

CSD A7
Howdy. I'm curious how Massimo Dutti currently states why the company is significant or why it is important? The reason I ask is because you recently declined a speedy tag I had on the article. There are indeed links on the page now, but nothing in the body of the article "indicates why its subject is important or significant". All the links appear to do is show verifiability which is not what CSD A7 is about.--Rockfang (talk) 12:08, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Having media coverage is itself an assertion of importance. This article would currently survive an AfD, and it would therefore be ludicrous to speedy delete it. Epbr123 (talk) 12:11, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Decline of speedy deletion
Your decline reason for the article Satanas was that is had independent coverage. The only "source" listed is a book that supposedly mentions them at a link that doesn't work. Why is that considered independant coverage? The other external link streetgangs.com wouldn't meet the criteria of a reliable source. Niteshift36 (talk) 22:59, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
 * We should to assume good faith and assume that whoever added the book reference wasn't lying about it mentioning Satanas, especially as it was added by an established user. Most book sources aren't available online anyway, so a reference having a deadlink doesn't disqualify it as a source. Besides, the article previously survived an AfD here. Epbr123 (talk) 23:12, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Seems odd to me that an article that is over a year and a half old consists of 2 sentences. Yes, 2 sentences. Their "notability" seems very localized. Oh well. Niteshift36 (talk) 23:19, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Daisy Turner
The inclusion of biographical info on Daisy Turner was a result of combining earlier seperate Alex Turner page. I hope that you will help keep that data in Wikipedia as it is important. I'm a newby and not good at reverting. Could you please put it back in and help keep the vandals away??Hmose (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 04:16, 31 December 2008 (UTC).

Thanks for your help. Hmose (talk) 01:41, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lynn LeMay
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Lynn LeMay, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * Little/No content. Article may or may not qualify as a Stub. Contains little information, and barely establishes Notability

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Sephiroth storm (talk) 11:24, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Very bad BLP violations at Ona Zee
You may wish to address my comments at Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 20:48, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Requests_for_adminship/Climie.ca
Hello, EPBR123. I wonder if you might be persuaded to take another look at Cam's RFA, and possibly reconsider your oppose vote? I think that Cam's track record of collaborating with others indicates that there would be a high likliness of asking others before expiramenting with the tools carelessly. Of course, even if accidents occur, most mismoppings can be easily fixed. The things that can't be so easily fixed are the result of attitudes and interactions with other editors, an area in which I think Cam does quite well. Thanks for your time.  Jerry  delusional ¤ kangaroo 02:42, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
 * My main concern is his lack of experience at CSD, which is an area where mistakes aren't easily spotted or fixed. There are several well-respected users who regularly speedy delete articles inappropriately, so I'd prefer to see actual evidence that he understands the CSD criteria, rather than judge his abilities by his reputation at Milhist. Epbr123 (talk) 12:17, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. Thanks for reconsidering the matter.  Jerry   delusional ¤ kangaroo 18:13, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Actually, I just converted my support to neutral for this very reason. Cam's answer to Q6 demonstrates a total lack of understanding of CSD.  Jerry  delusional ¤ kangaroo 18:28, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Copyright Agency Ltd
Would you please undelete this article so I can add further information. CAL is the primary agency for permitting use of printed and electronic copyright material in Australia. When I went online just now to add that further information I was surprised to see the article completely gone, and so quickly. Thanks for your time Gubernatoria (talk) 13:11, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I've undeleted the article to give you a chance to improve the article. To prevent it from being deleted again, you'll need to add some significant, independent sources to show that it passes the notability criteria. Epbr123 (talk) 15:38, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

?
Is it illeagle to make a page of yourself? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cheesy142 (talk • contribs) 19:17, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Skeeter Kerkove Vandalism
I got a notice from you that someone from 72.177.24.59 had vandalized the above article. The IP in question is for the Thorndale, Texas public library. I am the computer coordinator and I am attempting to find out who did this. If it occurs again, please drop me another message. Please don't ban this IP as a number of people who aren't vandalizing jerks will be effected by it. I will try to track this moron down from my end. Thanks! Thorndale Public Library Internet Committee 72.177.24.59 (talk) 20:35, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

Jerboas
Perhaps you are a better user to revert an edit I did when I should have simply undone a vandalizer's handiwork. Please visit Jerboa and fix the page better than I can. Thanks. :) (I contacted you since you were the last registered user to make an edit on that page)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.10.173.231 (talk) 04:30, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Hi there, how ya doin'?

Just a thought
You redirect Autum -> Autumn

Fair enough, might Autun also be possible? Not really tempted to create a dab for 2 misspellings but had you not redirected to autumn, I would have to Autun. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 00:22, 9 January 2009 (UTC) I'll leave it your judgment, but I wonder whether you had even considered Autun... Carlossuarez46 (talk) 00:23, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't really mind where it's redirected to. It was originally a redirect to Autumn, before someone changed it into an article on a non-notable rabbit called Autum. I just restored the original redirect. Epbr123 (talk) 00:30, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Sorry about my vandalism
I was actually just about to revert it myself when the "new message" box popped up.--206.28.43.70 (talk) 22:54, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Ok. Epbr123 (talk) 22:58, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
 * BTW, how many warnings does one have to recieve for vandalism before a block occurs?--206.28.43.70 (talk) 23:07, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Depends on the type of vandalism. Epbr123 (talk) 23:08, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, my type for instance.--206.28.43.70 (talk) 23:09, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
 * A vandal is blocked when it becomes clear that they aren't going to stop, however many warnings that takes. Epbr123 (talk) 23:16, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Thnx.--206.28.43.70 (talk) 23:20, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

iafd and the MoS
I don't think I've seen anything in regard to your claim that the "iafd name" template violates the MoS. Can you point out the particular section you're referring to? Thanks...Valrith (talk) 20:15, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Citing sources states that the citation style used in an article has to be consistant. There are no other citation templates that produce the same citation style as Template:Iafd name, so the non-iafd sources will be cited in a different style to that of the iafd sources. The template also doesn't include a parameter for the access date. The template looks as though it was only designed to be used in the external links section, not as a reference. Epbr123 (talk) 20:40, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

LOK and Vandalism
After removing the vandalism on "Songs of the Century" done by LOK-fans, it was time to lets them know the door swings both ways. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.59.183.140 (talk) 23:30, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

subst'ing templates
Any idea if it's possible to subst a template that exists in the User namespace in an article in the main namespace? Previews appear to indicate it doesn't... Thanks. Valrith (talk) 16:25, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
 * You can't see the effect of subst until you save the page, rather than just previewing it. seems to work below. Epbr123 (talk) 21:02, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

at the Internet Adult Film Database
 * Beautiful. Thanks! Valrith (talk) 21:07, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Wikiproject Porn
Could you add your thoughts to this please? Thanks, Dismas |(talk) 04:37, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Request
Could you please give us a hand copyediting The Swimming Hole? You were requested by name at Featured article candidates/The Swimming Hole. Raul654 (talk) 02:15, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Requests for adminship/Kanonkas
Thank you Epbr for voting in my successfully closed RfA! I'm glad that you trust me. Ping me if you need anything! Best regards, -- Kanonkas : Talk  18:29, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

William D. Boyce
Can you check this for MOS compliance? Thanks.  — Rlevse • Talk  • 23:42, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Can you help?
Your naem came up here as someone who may be able to help me with locating and correcting certain formatting issues in the article USS Iowa (BB-61). Can you help? TomStar81 (Talk) 20:21, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

RfA thankspam
Denbot (talk) 22:43, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Old Arley
A tag has been placed on Old Arley requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you.  AJUK   Talk!! 14:20, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

I disagree with the Digital Copy deletion
I have for some time been considering creating an article about Digital Copy and awhile ago after a Google search I was pleased to find an article about it on Wikipedia, but soon discovered that the page had been deleted roughly a month or less after it was created. The Google cache is no longer available, but the article was copied here: and in time we'll see what the Internet Archive was able to capture, if anything. (I'm curious as to what the talk page contained.)

The cited reason for the deletion was A7, but I disagree with that criteria and I'm surprised there apparently wasn't any discussion prior to deletion. I would argue that Digital Copy, a feature included with DVD's and Blu-ray Discs, is far from obscure and is of sufficient notability for an article. One need only do a Google search to find several articles about it and links to studios' Digital Copy sites. Amazon.com searches bring up dozens of titles, studios are rereleasing old titles repackaged with Digital Copy, and it seems as if every week brings another one or few Digital Copy titles and there may someday be thousands. Digital Copy is rapidly becoming a standard feature of major mainstream releases and like Infinifilm, Nuon, and Superbit, it should have its own article.

Of course, I could just be misunderstanding the actual reason for the deletion. Judging from my saved copy of the Google cache and the above Yahoo! Answers article, the article itself was pretty good for a description of Digital Copy, but lacking in links (hence not justifying itself according to A7), redirected to Digital copy DVD's (perhaps unwisely, especially since Blu-ray is not DVD), had a link to its own redirect, and contained a futile attempt at a list of titles. Yes, a bit of a mess, but a mess with potential. (Did I just say that?) If it was deleted for technical reasons, I would prefer that it had been cleaned up and not deleted. I would like to recreate the article with most of the text intact, links to articles and studios' sites, and without the list, but I won't do so without your input and (I hope) blessing.

Klknoles (talk) 00:30, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, the article was deleted in error. I misunderstood what the article had said, thinking it was about an online DVD retailer. The article shouldn't have been deleted without discussion and has now been restored. Regards. Epbr123 (talk) 01:12, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Wow! That was easy. For awhile there I was afraid I was really gonna have to fight a losing battle for it. I'll add some links to to the bottom of the page and I'll put links in most of the articles that mention Digital Copy (But not High School Musical 3 and Hancock since those are locked) and note these changes in the talk page. I'll do what I can to make this article take off in no time.

Klknoles (talk) 05:33, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

FAC thanks
Thank you for all the recent help on MoS corrections to articles at FAC; it's always appreciated! Sandy Georgia (Talk) 01:45, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

FAC help
Hi there, Sandy Georgia recommended that I contact you to ask for your help. United States Military Academy is currently up for FAC and Sandy Georgia says that perhaps that you can help. There have been several experienced editors helping push this article, but I've been the main contributor and I am still very new at editing wikipedia. My biggest weakness are the little things in WP:MoS (at least I think so!). I get better every time I log in. Could you take a look at USMA and the FAC review so far and see what you think? Thanks! Ahodges7 18:54, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Wow, thanks for the quick response. I'm sorry the article is so out of standard of WP:MoS.  I've read the standards, but I learn so much more by watching your corrections.  Thanks!   Ahodges7  01:12, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I've finished looking through, although there's a few things left to sort out:
 * Per MOS:IMAGE, text should avoid being sandwiched between two images, as in the Notable alumni section. Also, left-aligned images shouldn't be placed at the start of subsections, like in the Sedgwick's spurs section. To fix these two issues, you'll probably need to remove images from the article.
 * "The head of DPE holds the title of Master of the Sword (MOS), dating to the 1800s" - "the 1800s" means the decade 1800-1809, rather than the 19th century. Was this intended? Epbr123 (talk) 03:29, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Same here. Was referred to your for help on WP:MOS issues concerning Judiciary Reorganization Bill of 1937. Foofighter20x (talk) 21:22, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Associated Newspapers
Is there any particular reason you deleted Associated Newspapers? There are a lot of incoming links, so you may have been halfway through a page move. --Rumping (talk) 12:42, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * It was deleted to enable a page move. Whoever tagged the page for deletion should have carried out the move. Epbr123 (talk) 14:25, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Fine - I thought that might be it (but not being able to see deleted history, I could never be sure). Thanks for completing the move. --Rumping (talk) 00:31, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Photos
Hello, I just noticed that you have started afew articles of stars, and just thought that if you ever need to get hold of any good photos, which are clear and great quality than lukeisbakck ones. Just ask User:Morbidthoughts, using flickr account in their talk/discussion page which ones you would like and hopefully the person will load them up themselves. 86.172.35.196 (talk) 19:47, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Byron Brown
At Featured article candidates/Byron Brown, Sandy mentioned that you should be contacted about an MoS cleanup of Byron Brown. It currently has 3 supports and no opposes plus a passing image review. Your MoS validation could get it over the hump.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 21:44, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for stopping by.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 03:45, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Poll on Jessica Drake image
Since disagreement over the Jessica Drake image has been unsettled, I've decided to create a poll which will hopefully settle the issue and create a rough consensus. The poll is at Talk:Jessica_Drake. Valrith (talk) 05:30, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Gabriella Fox
Thank you. David in DC (talk) 01:45, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

RfA thanks
Thank you for your comments on my RfA (which passed 70/7/3). I do take your concerns about my experience seriously, and even partly agree with them, and can assure you that I will act with due circumspection on all matters administrative while I figure things out. Thanks! --Regent's Park (Rose Garden) 00:32, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

William Henry Harrison
Can you check this for MOS compliance? Thanks.  — Rlevse • Talk  • 23:57, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 22:47, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Saxbe fix
Would you consider doing an MOS check on Saxbe fix. Leave a note on its FAC discussion page if you do so.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 17:42, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Wiltshire villages
Hi. This note is about the stubs you have been creating for Wiltshire "villages", but some of them are only farms. I have moved Allington Bar (a farm) to Allington, North Wiltshire, which is the village, but I don't know what to do with Bowldown, that's a farm, and Braydon Side, that's Braydonside in Brinkworth, two farms, except to propose them for deletion. Maybe you can help? Dzw49 (talk) 01:18, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The only Broomfield I can find in Wiltshire is a street in Chippenham. Dzw49 (talk) 02:22, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Kripalu Center
Hi, I found you on the Volunteer list and I was hoping you give 5 minutes to address some concerns we have at Kripalu Center, particularly whether or not the entire economics section is encyclopedic. This is also discussed at the talk page. The entire article could some degree of attention. Thanks! -- ThujaSol  ∆  17:58, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks and a request
Thanks for signing up at Peer review/volunteers and for your work doing reviews. It is now just over a year since the last peer review was archived with no repsonse after 14 (or more) days, something we all can be proud of. There is a new Peer review user box to track the backlog (peer reviews at least 4 days old with no substantial response), which can be found here. To include it on your user or talk page, please add. Thanks again, and keep up the good work, Ruhrfisch &gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 03:51, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings
Epbr123, would you mind running a MOS check on this article? Awadewit recommended that you'd be a good person to ask. We're trying to get the article ready for FAC, and this is one of the last things that need to be done. Thanks so much. --Figureskatingfan (talk) 21:36, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Astley Cross
I have nominated Astley Cross, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Astley Cross. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. OrangeDog (talk • edits) 08:24, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Edmonton
I am just here to tell you i am working on getting the Edmonton article back up to GA i have been woring on the cites mostly but i plan to work on every thing you have listed. Kyle1278 (talk) 22:43, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

request for peer review
Hi Epbr123, I saw your name on the WP:Cities list of peer reviewers and would just like to say I would be thrilled if you would help the Spokane, Washington article by peer reviewing it. Thanks for your consideration, Anon134 (talk) 02:52, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of User talk:90.227.54.114
A tag has been placed on User talk:90.227.54.114, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Beeblebrox (talk) 04:42, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Osteochondritis dissecans' FAC could use your help
Sandy Georgia reccomended you as a possible reviewer for my FAC (which is in desperate need of a MoS review). Much thanks, FoodPuma 04:56, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Zagreb article
Since I joined the encyclopedia, I've greatly edited Zagreb, Belgrade, Kiev, Bucharest and Cyprus articles; I just think as an experimented editor, that one of those, ZAGREB, SHOULD BE MOVED OUT FROM A B CLASS ARTICLE TO A FEATURED ONE, I assure that this article has no place in the actual one. Please do so and take care of Zagreb article, Im also a member of Zagreb project; I hope i will not regret to talk to you in place to go talking and requesting to another user. NIR-Warrior (talk) 09:33, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

File:North East Kent.PNG listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:North East Kent.PNG, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Skier Dude ( talk ) 17:59, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Could you take a look at the RfC for "minimum wage"?
We desperately need some comment from outside editors. Thanks. Academic38 (talk) 14:36, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Camera Green
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Camera Green, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Village does not appear to exist!

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Jenuk1985 |  Talk  14:33, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 22:24, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Fountain_of_Time
Fountain of Time, likely WP's best article on a memorial to peace, is at FAC and could use a MOS review/copyedit. In the name of peace, would you consider giving it a look.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 15:44, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Jacqueline du Pré
Hi. This is a terrible Blast From The Past, concerning something you added >2 years ago, sorry! But, if you felt like it, could you please have a look at Talk:Jacqueline_du_Pré which queries her having one under that name, at that date ... I wondered if there was any chance we could get a source for this? Sorry to bother you, and thanks and best wishes DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered (talk) 17:14, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Ran
Since you have worked on Ran, I am obligated to inform you that I have nominated Ran for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. Andrzejbanas (talk) 22:00, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

GA Sweeps update
Hello, I hope you are doing well. I am contacting you because you have contributed or expressed interest in the GA sweeps process. Last month, only two articles were reviewed. This is definitely a low point after our peak at the beginning of the process with 163 articles reviewed in September 2007. After nearly two years, the running total has just passed the 50% mark. In order to expediate the reviewing, several changes have been made to the process. A new worklist has been created, detailing which articles are left to review. All exempt and previously reviewed articles have already been removed from the list. Instead of reviewing by topic, you can consider picking and choosing whichever articles interest you.

All exempt articles that have reached FA status have now been moved to a separate section at the end of the running total page. I went through all of the members' running totals and updated the results to reflect the move. As a result your reviewed article total may have decreased a bit. After removing duplicate articles and these FAs, the running total leaves us at ~1,400 out of 2,808 articles reviewed.

If you currently have any articles on hold or at GAR, please consider concluding those reviews and updating your results. I'm hoping that this new list and increased efforts can help us to increase the number of reviews. We are always looking for new members to assist with the remaining articles, so if you know of anybody that can assist please direct them to the GA sweeps page. In addition, for every member that reviews 100 articles or has a significant impact on the process, will get an award when they reach that mark. If only 14 editors achieve this feat starting now, we would be done with Sweeps! Of course, having more people reviewing less articles would be better for all involved, so please consider asking others to help out. If you have any questions about the process, reviewing, or need help with a particular article, please contact me or OhanaUnited and we'll be happy to help. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:24, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Lists of awards by adult actor
I have nominated lists of awards by adult actor for renaming to lists of awards by pornographic film actors. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:50, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Roxy Panther
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Roxy Panther, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * fails WP:Pornbio as recently made more restrictive, no other indication of notability

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 19:17, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

GA Sweeps June update
Thanks to everyone's dedicated efforts to the GA Sweeps process, a total of 396 articles were swept in May! That more than doubles our most successful month of 163 swept articles in September 2007 (and the 2 articles swept in April)! I plan to be sending out updates at the beginning of each month detailing any changes, updates, or other news until Sweeps are completed. So if you get sick of me, keep reviewing articles so we can be done (and then maybe you'll just occasionally bump into me). We are currently over 60% done with Sweeps, with just over a 1,000 articles left to review. With over 40 members, that averages out to about 24 articles per person. If each member reviews an article a day this month (or several!), we'll be completely finished. I know that may be asking for a lot, but it would allow us to complete Sweeps and allow you to spend more time writing GAs, reviewing GANs, or focusing on other GARs (or whatever else it is you do to improve Wikipedia) as well as finish ahead of the two-year mark coming up in August. I recognize that this can be a difficult process at times and appreciate your tenacity in spending time in ensuring the quality of the older GAs. Feel free to recruit other editors who have reviewed GANs in the past and might be interested in the process. The more editors, the less the workload, and hopefully the faster this will be completed. If you have any questions about reviews or the process let me know and I'll be happy to get back to you. Again, thank you for taking the time to help with the process, I appreciate your efforts! --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 18:00, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Adajja
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Adajja, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:PORNBIO under more recent, more rigorous criteria; no other indication of notability

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 20:44, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Angela Tiger
A tag has been placed on Angela Tiger requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. KMFDM FAN (talk!) 23:55, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Notability (people)
Of interest ? Power.corrupts (talk) 16:14, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I propose to roll back the too bold change - comments? Power.corrupts (talk) 21:35, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

GA Sweeps July update
Thanks to everyone's dedicated efforts to the GA Sweeps process, a total of 290 articles were swept in June! Last month was our second most successful month in reviewing articles (after May). We are currently over 70% done with Sweeps, with just under 800 articles left to review. With nearly 50 members, that averages out to about 15 articles per person. If each member reviews an article every other day this month (or several!), we'll be completely finished. This may sound difficult, but if everyone completes their reviews, Sweeps would be completed in less than two years when we first started (with only four members!). With the conclusion of Sweeps, each editor could spend more time writing GAs, reviewing at the backlogged GAN, or focusing on other GARs. Again, I want to thank you for using your time to ensure the quality of the older GAs. Feel free to recruit other editors who have reviewed GANs in the past and might be interested in the process. The more editors, the less the workload, and hopefully the faster this will be completed. If you have any questions about reviews or the process let me know and I'll be happy to get back to you. Again, thank you for taking the time to help with the process, I appreciate your efforts! --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 17:44, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Your style and prose checklist
Rather good, Epbr. May I link to it? On that matter, is there a section-link that will take the user straight to the list? I tried User:Epbr123, but it still goes to the top of your user page. Tony  (talk)  11:07, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Ah, it does work after all. Tony   (talk)  11:08, 12 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Many of the entries in that list are just plain incorrect, particularly those relating to the GA criteria. --Malleus Fatuorum 12:59, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Only if there's been a load of pointless changes to GA recently. Epbr123 (talk) 09:27, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Opinion requested
If you don't mind, I'd appreciate your input on this topic: Template talk:Infobox adult female

Thanks, Dismas |(talk) 03:56, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

Science project Potential Viral Link
Hi Epbr123,

I was just browsing this article and clicked on the external link to Science Fair Projects. It appears that the link is infected (it tries to crash your machine by endlessly spawning windows in your browser). I don't want to remove the link before getting a second option. Can you please verify? BTW, this entry was made by:[]--Apelbaum (talk) 00:13, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Whitstable
nominated Whitstable for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here.  SilkTork  *YES! 21:58, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

GA Sweeps August update
Thanks to everyone's dedicated efforts to the GA Sweeps process, a total of 215 articles were swept in July! We are currently nearly 80% done with Sweeps, with under 600 articles left to review. With 50 members, that averages out to about 12 articles per person. Once the remaining articles drop to 100, I'll help in reviewing the last articles (I'm currently taking a break). If each member reviews an article every other day this month (or several!), we'll be completely finished. Again, I want to thank you for using your time to ensure the quality of the older GAs. Feel free to recruit other editors who have reviewed GANs in the past and might be interested in the process. The more editors, the less the workload, and hopefully the faster this will be completed. If you have any questions about reviews or the process let me know and I'll be happy to get back to you. Again, thank you for taking the time to help with the process, I appreciate your efforts! --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 19:25, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Jayme Langford
I have nominated Jayme Langford, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Jayme Langford. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Crafty (talk) 03:50, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Welcome back
A lot has changed in the last 6 months. The project's changes to PORNBIO were pushed through despite some vehement objections. I guess we are now seeing the consequences in the deletion page. Morbidthoughts (talk) 16:07, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Good work with pushing through the changes. Epbr123 (talk) 21:12, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * On another note, do you believe I am ready for another RfA? Morbidthoughts (talk) 16:31, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I think you're ready for another go. Your biggest mistake last time was saying you wanted to work in admin areas that you had little experience in, but I think you experienced enough in those areas now and are actually one of the best new page patrollers I've seen. Your lack of a Good Article or DYK may be a small problem, but you shouldn't go a write one just to please a couple of people at RfA. I won't nominate you this time though, as I think you need someone fresh, and you need someone else to check your contributions first. Epbr123 (talk) 18:12, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

Proposed Deletion of Envy (pornographic actress)
I removed your PROD, due to the fact that I PRODed this same article on July 28th, and someone else had removed it (and as you're probably aware, an article can only be Proposed for Deletion a single time). However, I have now formally Nominated it for Deletion. The discussion can be found at the link below, in case you're interested.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Envy_(pornographic_actress)_(2nd_nomination)

KevinOKeeffe (talk) 21:01, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 15:23, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

dePRODing of articles
Hello Epbr123, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD templates you added to a number of articles were removed:
 * PROD removed from Tera Joy, by User:ThaddeusB, with summary '(remove PROD - a previous prod was contested and thus the article is no longer eligible for proposed deletion)'
 * PROD removed from Orchidea Keresztes, by User:ThaddeusB, with summary '(remove PROD - a previous prod was contested and thus the article is no longer eligible for proposed deletion)'
 * PROD removed from McKayla Matthews, by User:ThaddeusB, with summary '(contest prod - won an AVN award in 2001 and is thus notable - correct article to reflect that with reference)'
 * PROD removed from Michele Raven, by User:SilkTork, with summary '(previously prodded)'

Please consider discussing your concerns with the relevant users before pursuing deletion further. If you still think the articles should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may send them to WP:AfD for community discussion. Thank you - SDPatrolBot (talk) (Learn how to opt out of these messages)

I made this comment on the talk page of pornproject list of deletions but wasn't sure if you saw it. As admin, you have the power to recover pages in case the 2009 nominees get renominated in November, like Viva Style and Jennifer Dark. Morbidthoughts (talk) 21:42, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, I'll recover their articles if they get renominated. I have a subpage that I use to easily identify whether a performer has multiple nominations. Epbr123 (talk) 22:13, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

We need buttons!
Can we get a little help with user:Aviation fellow 101? He keeps creating articles with absoulutely no content after several warnings, and was reported at AIV, but no-one is blocking him. He's creating a huge mess for others to clean up after. - Drew S</b>mith <i style="font-size:smaller;color:#ccc">What I've done</i> 13:29, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Mia Banggs
I have nominated Mia Banggs, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Mia Banggs&. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Morbidthoughts (talk) 21:33, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Mia Banggs
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Mia Banggs. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Mia Banggs (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:19, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 17:51, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Do you remember?
Asking me if I would be up for Adminship back in May last year. I said then I wasn't ready. Well, I think I'm ready now and have a RfA up and running. Mjroots (talk) 15:40, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Please block
Greetings Epbr123 - The other day you left a warning on User talk:208.108.81.37. This user has been at it again, so please block. Thank you--Technopat (talk) 13:53, 1 October 2009 (UTC).
 * Done. Epbr123 (talk) 14:18, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Exotica (person)
I have nominated Exotica (person), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Exotica (person). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Horrorshowj (talk) 04:43, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

Just a reminder
Please look at the article history before you use PROD. An article that's already survived a PROD or AfD, which three of your last batch had, is ineligible for prodding.Horrorshowj (talk) 05:21, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

Linking to your style and prose checklist
Hi, Epbr. I was asked to write a "copy-editing essentials" article for the MilHist Academy. Please let me know whether it can be improved. Just letting you know I've included a link to your guide. Should I say anything about it? Not sure it adheres entirely to MoS etc nowadays, but that probably doesn't matter. WikiProject_Military_history/Academy/Copy-editing_essentials Tony   (talk)  09:15, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

Hey
You keep beating me to reverts on recent changes - Keep up the great work! --Aiken&#39;s drum (talk) 10:15, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Gia Paloma / Yahoo Serious - Sources challenge
Saw your edit in the Yahoo Serious page which was cited by me as an example in the Gia Paloma discussion. Now that's what I call consistent! Respect. 82.74.193.75 (talk) 00:07, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Found a reference for "Greg Pead", you may want to check it out. Also you missed a spot - the box on the right hand side still said "Greg Pead" after your edit. Krgds. 82.74.193.75 (talk) 00:17, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Nice
"Welcome to Wikipedia." been here for three years, thanks.

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:38, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

Stone, Swale
I'm trying to figure out what's going on here, having found this redirect on the Stone (disambiguation) page (and knowing nothing about Swale or Kent or anywhere in the UK outside London).

In May 2007 you started this stub that said (paraphrasing) "Stone is a village in Swale." Then in July 2007 you said you merged it to Stone Chapel, Kent, but it appears you just started a new article at that title, with the same text, but instead of Stone it says "Stalisfield is a village in Kent." (I don't know what the relation is between "Stalisfield" and "Stone Chapel".) Then six months later, someone rewrote the article so it actually is about a Stone Chapel. At the end of 2008, it was redirected to Faversham Stone Chapel.

The current situation is that Stone, Swale redirectes to Faversham Stone Chapel, a chapel in Swale that happens to be made out of stone. As far as I can tell from the Swale article and template, there's no place in Swale called Stone. If there is such a place, there doesn't seem to be any article acknowledging it. So I was thinking I'd put the redirect up for deletion but since you still seem to be around, I figured I'd ask you first if you can shed any light here, in part because I'm just curious how this happened. Propaniac (talk) 16:49, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The Stone, Swale and Stone Chapel, Kent articles were created using a source that turned out to be unreliable. There are no settlements in Swale called Stone or Stone Chapel, so these redirects can be deleted. Epbr123 (talk) 18:48, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I'm going to copy this conversation to Talk:Stone, Swale, assuming you don't mind. Propaniac (talk) 13:55, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

RFA spam

 * &mdash;Kww(talk) 18:37, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

Barnstar

 * Thanks, John. Epbr123 (talk) 20:02, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

Re-adding you to WP:HAU
Hello! Do you mind if I re-add you to Highly Active Users/Europe? I removed your name earlier this year since your last edit was February 6, 2009. It's great to see you contributing here and reverting vandalism again. Schfifty 3  22:05, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi. I don't mind. Epbr123 (talk) 22:15, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

Chihea
Given the author's username, it kind of looked like the user was making a brag page about herself - but since the article didn't expressly say that, I restored the article (with the prod tag) and added a prod2. NawlinWiki (talk) 13:15, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

User page
Why don't you have any personal information on your User Page? -- Stillwaterising (talk) 01:01, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I like to keep my personal information personal. Anything you particularly want to know? Epbr123 (talk) 01:13, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Something, anything. Put an explanation about your views about putting your personal information on your userpage or a userbox that says you don't like userboxes. -- Stillwaterising (talk) 05:46, 3 November 2009 (UTC)


 * What's up between you and Hullaballoo Wolfowitz? You two seem to tag-team other users in deletion discussions. Are you his meatpuppetmaster? Can you demonstate muliple occurrances of you two casting dissenting opinions in Afd or BLP discussions? -Stillwaterising (talk) 16:03, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
 * So you still haven't read WP:AGF then? There's a minor BLP disagreement between us two threads below. Epbr123 (talk) 19:06, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Your good faith with me expired a while ago, unfortunately, and I've made some recommendation as to how you can get it back. For starters, show some integrity and allow other users' critical remarks to remain on your talk pages. WP:AGF is not intended to keep us from occasionally questioning each others' motives, when appropriate. -Stillwaterising (talk) 20:15, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
 * What do you think my motives are? Epbr123 (talk) 20:19, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Here's an administrator who not only saves his criticisms, he showcases them: User:Malik Shabazz/Fan mail -Stillwaterising (talk) 20:24, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I really don't know, Epbr, but I've seen your methods. -Stillwaterising (talk) 20:26, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Request for Discussion
I have archived our previous discussion at User:Stillwaterising/Epbr123. I would like you to go there and finish the discussion. I have asked for editorial insight and the resulting conversations are on my talk page. I first tried to have a conversation about the Afd for Heather Harmon on the article's talk page however you have failed to finish it. We've had our discussion on the Afd page and you've failed to finish that too. I brought my concerns to you on your talk page and the only reply I received was:
 * The irony of that RfA oppose still amuses me. I assure you I have no anti-porn bias, which you'll be able to see from my contributions. I'm glad your trying to expand Wikipedia's coverage on the topic, but unfortunately you've decided to write about a porn star that doesn't fulfill the notability criteria. Epbr123 (talk) 09:49, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

You then deleted the conversation without even leaving me a comment on my talk page. Even my innocent inquiry about your lack of a user page was only briefly responded to, then deleted. I'm trying in good faith to discuss this with you, but your lack of response is deeply troubling me.

I would like to know more about the Afd process. My impression is that as the originator of the Afd request you are to be the moderator of the Afd discussion, not the chief complainant. How do I request that a new moderator be enacted? What happens when the discussion is over? Who make the final decision on whether consensus was reached? --Stillwaterising (talk) 08:19, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Firstly, I have the right to remove content from my talk page. I will not tolerate personal attacks and assumptions of bad faith on my page. Regarding AfD, as the originator of the Afd request, I am the "chief complainant". Once the AfD discussion is over, another admin will decide what the consensus is. At the moment, the majority think the article should be deleted. Please also read the part about votestacking at WP:CANVASSING; the AfD already has a keep vote resulting from your user page messages. Epbr123 (talk) 10:26, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't care about "votes". You of all people should know about WP:DEMOCRACY. What I care about is reaching consensus, and right now I see that it is split. So what if I may solicited a few users to visit the Afd page? I've never said anything  more than "please go (here) and enter your opinion." -- Stillwaterising (talk) 11:15, 5 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Re "votestacking" - I did notify the top 3 contributors of HH to go to the Afd. Ironically, one of them is looking like he'll cast a delete vote. He's either waiting to see how the discussion goes or is refraining from voting.


 * I would like to clear up the disagreement between us. Is there a way we can talk privately without giving out my email? Do you use one of the chat systems? -Stillwaterising (talk) 21:53, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't use any chat systems. You can email me using the "Email this user" link on the left, although it would allow me to see your address. Epbr123 (talk) 22:15, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I think we're done with this conversation, you can archive it blank it if you wish. -Stillwaterising (talk) 17:05, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Janine Lindemulder/Holly Madison
Looks to me like that source you cite is a recycled press release, judging by the number of places it shows up in pretty much exact copies. Funny that they're first cousins in one copy, second in another. Xbiz.com identifies it as "COMPANY PRESS," too. I therefore don't think it's a good enough ref for a BLP, but it is a much closer call than the custody stuff. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 21:06, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I've now replaced it with the only non-press-release source I could find, which just refers to her as a relative. Possibly AVN did some fact-checking on the press release and changed it to first cousins. Epbr123 (talk) 21:34, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Isn't editorial oversight a requirement of a reliable secondary source? -Stillwaterising (talk) 14:50, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
 * My understanding is that a press release can be considered a reliable source about itself (Juicy Entertainment) but not on other topics, like Holly Madison. -Stillwaterising (talk) 18:08, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
 * As with any primary source, press releases can be a reliable source for some statements. Press releases are probably only a reliable source for someone's personal information if they are written by that person, rather than a company they work for. On this occassion, there's a conflict between the press statement and the AVN article, so it's best to treat neither as reliable. Epbr123 (talk) 18:38, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

BIO#5
You're opposed to your own proposal? How ironic is that?! - Stillwaterising (talk) 04:27, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Where did I oppose my proposal? Epbr123 (talk) 04:35, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of District of Canterbury Credit Union


The article District of Canterbury Credit Union has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * not clear how this orphaned article meets notability guidelines, lacks any references to 3rd party sources

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RadioFan (talk) 16:16, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Battleton
I have nominated Battleton, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Battleton. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. &mdash; Rod talk 21:01, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
 * This doesn't apply to the article you created but to a later revision.&mdash; Rod talk 21:02, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Tyra Banxxx
Why did you state it was unsourced. It was mentioned in Wikipedia that she has english background prior to my change. Norum 21:06, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
 * There's no source that she even has English heritage, let alone that her ethnicity is English. Epbr123 (talk) 21:33, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I am just saying what it stated before I made the change.


 * ethnicity = Biracial - African American and British descent-

If there was no proof for that, well, that is another case. Norum 22:45, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Even if there's proof she is of British decent, having a British ancestor doesn't necessarily make her ethnicity British, and it certainly doesn't necessarily make her ethnicity English. Epbr123 (talk) 23:01, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Come to think of it, there can not be such thing as a British ethnicity for the simple fact that the term "British" refers to nationals of the UK and that could be either English, Scottish or Welsh. So yeah, you've got a point there. Norum 17:53, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Invitation
I notice that many of the articles you have worked on have been put up for deletion, I can relate completely. But I found a group of editors who try to rescue encyclopedic articles:

Vicky Vette Discussion Deletion
The link you cited doesn't apply to the talk pages, only the articles. You may disagree with what I said, but Wikipedia doesn't give you free reign to censor it. But just to humor you, I put a link to the news story in it. Neoyamaneko (talk) 23:37, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Help with copyright issue
Hi Epbr123, can you help me with a copyright issue. Ahmad123987 uploaded File:Arts-bocelli-horse-220.jpg which I tagged as an obvious copyright infringement as it's from Getty images, with an author mentioned. He/she removed the note and added a "why I can't upload this picture, it's a great picture" message on the file talk page. The user doesn't get copyright with pictures and has some other disregards for guidelines, like changing talk page banner ratings to FA and GA without any review etc. I don't know whether he/she also copy-pasted text. Could you delete the image and explain. I mean, the notification on the talk page says it all I would think but apparently not (it doesn't help that the user removes talk page messages of deletion). Thank you! Hekerui (talk) 12:21, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Mason Moore
Sir, As per Articles for deletion/Mason Moore for Mason Moore, the reason stated "No significant coverage" and non compliance with WP:PORNBIO, but i would like to express my view over the issue, That i had gone through the Actress profile well, Though she is new to this genre,but still She has been covered significant under what exactly we call for Porn actress, she is not an actress from Hollywood, so we might call for significant status for her. As stated in WP:PORNBIO, Though she had not won a well-known award, such as those listed in Category:Pornographic film awards or Category:Film awards. but she had been covered & nominated in AVN Awards like that of AVN Hall of Fame. & she had contributed a lot in Porn Industry at such a little time. Well the aforementioned details are formalised, & the informal one is that, i am new to wikipedia, & would to like contribute for my lifetime, so i am looking for your positive response over this issue, Please assist me. Thanks. (   Abu Torsam    12:06, 13 December 2009 (UTC))
 * The best way to show she is notable is to find reliable sources that discuss her in a fair amount of detail. I've done a fairly extensive search for sources on her, but I'm afraid I can't find any. Epbr123 (talk) 14:33, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

"St Peters compared" (Demography tables)
In a number of Civil Parish articles (eg Stantonbury and others), you added a demography table - all of which have the title "St Peters compared". Was this intentional? If so, why? --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 16:45, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
 * No, it wasn't intentional. Epbr123 (talk) 22:15, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

About Alexis Malone
Don't forget PORNBIO only considers finalists for FAME according to the footnote. This should be a CSD G4. Morbidthoughts (talk) 00:46, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Ah, I hadn't noticed the footnote. I thought the part about "serious nominees" and FAME finalists had been lost when PORNBIO was changed. Epbr123 (talk) 13:01, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

GA Sweeps update
Thanks to everyone's efforts to the GA Sweeps process, we are currently over 90% done with only 226 articles remain to be swept! As always, I want to thank you for using your time to ensure the quality of the older GAs. With over 50 members participating in Sweeps, that averages out to about 4 articles per person! If each member reviews an article once a week this month (or several!), we'll be completely finished. At that point, awards will be handed out to reviewers. As an added incentive, if we complete over 100 articles reviewed this month, I will donate $100 to Wikipedia Forever on behalf of all GA Sweeps participants. I hope that this incentive will help to increase our motivation for completing Sweeps while supporting Wikipedia in the process. If you have any questions about reviews or Sweeps let me know and I'll be happy to get back to you. Again, thank you for taking the time to help with the process, I appreciate your efforts! --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 00:03, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Tanya Hyde
This article needs work -- please see the talk page. Kenilworth Terrace (talk) 18:29, 3 January 2010 (UTC)