User talk:Epicgenius/Archive/2017/Apr

Your GA nomination of Master Apartments
The article Master Apartments you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Master Apartments for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 05:01, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

DYK nomination of North Shore Branch
Hello! Your submission of North Shore Branch at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 01:48, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I will do a QPQ for that as soon as possible. Thanks for reminding me. epicgenius (talk) 15:43, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

IPad (fifth generation) listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect IPad (fifth generation). Since you had some involvement with the IPad (fifth generation) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Ups and Downs 1234 23:44, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Master Apartments, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bond. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

W to 86th Street Circus
Alright, I'm going to ask you this since your the most sane person I know on here. Should we not include the W to 86th Street on its page EVEN THOUGH we include that some N trains run to 96th Street? Apparently the reason why somebody told me was because it's not on the service guide, we'll neither is the N to 96th. I'm stuck here. AahdTahar (talk) 13:42, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I don't think the W should be listed as going to 86th St. There are more N trains going to 96th during rush hours (12 in each direction vs. 3 W's to 86th). I will post a more detailed explanation later. epicgenius (talk) 01:32, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
 * It looks like re-added the material about southern terminal. I guess the N to 96th and the W to 86th have the same unlisted status here, so I think it seems reasonable. epicgenius (talk) 12:52, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Good. Now I have enough votes from two members to restore the W to 86th Street on it's page. However, do we need to update the Fourth Avenue and Sea Beach stations to include the W? AahdTahar (talk) 14:33, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Can you add in the W for the stations along Fourth Avenue, I can't seem to figure out how to do it. And also, can you look over the Sea Beach edits I did, I improved some things. AahdTahar (talk) 03:30, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I will add it later. epicgenius (talk) 00:00, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Got a notification that I was mentioned on someone's talk page. I understand how mind-boggling all of this back and forth edits must be about the extent of the services, but you can't disagree that it wasn't unexpected. If the information is there to include, whether it comes from the timetables, the service guide on the map, or the GTFS data, or even the system pick schedules, why not include it? It's notable to include, it's relatively permanent, and despite only having a fig-leaf of information, it still makes it notable to include. I will wait until more editors weigh in before making any more changes, and from there if anyone needs help with the templates I'll be glad to help out in any shape or form. —Imdanumber1 (talk · contribs · email) 13:54, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the feedback. I'd like to see one or two more editors agree before we re add it though. epicgenius (talk) 00:00, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for doing it as I was busy. I agree with Imdanumber1, so I say we leave the Sea Beach line station pages as they are now, and if another editor upvotes it, we will readd the W to the station header. AahdTahar (talk) 15:16, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Appropriate symbol for limited service?
I was wondering what was your take as to what symbol would be appropriate for the use of the limited rush hour subway services, the rush hour only symbol of the rush hour peak direction symbol. I'm leaning towards the peak symbol. —Imdanumber1 (talk · contribs · email) 12:41, 4 April 2017 (UTC) P.S. AahdTahar what's your take?
 * If all the limited rush hour service is in the peak direction, use the rush-peak symbol. Otherwise, if it's in both directions or in the anti-peak direction (e.g. the Brooklyn-bound B train in the Bronx during the afternoon), use the regular rush-only symbol. epicgenius (talk) 12:56, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Fair enough, but what if it's a strange case like the E, in which there's trains that leave 179 in the morning and afternoon but only arrive at 179 in the afternoon and not the evening? Same for the W, there's only trains that leave 86th Street in the morning and none that leave in the afternoon. —Imdanumber1 (talk · contribs · email) 14:02, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I think we can use the rush-only designation since it is not exclusively peak service. epicgenius (talk) 14:28, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Fair enough, thank you. —Imdanumber1 (talk · contribs · email) 14:36, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Master Apartments
The article Master Apartments you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Master Apartments for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 03:01, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Coney Island–Stillwell Avenue (New York City Subway)
Mifter (talk) 00:01, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Awesome!!! —Imdanumber1 (talk · contribs · email) 00:40, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

A quick thanks
Just wanted to say thanks for your hard work with the limited service updates. I've been in the same boat helping other people new to the WikiProject in the past when I used to be a frequent editor, and I guess the tables have turned now, so I know what it's like to be cleaning up after others.

We'll be fine for the next two months before the system pick for the trains updates come June 25th, but the worst is over for now and we can relax until then. I have other concerns I would like to bring up to the WikiProject but in due time I'll get to it. Thank you again! —Imdanumber1 (talk · contribs · email) 00:46, 6 April 2017 (UTC)


 * You're welcome. And welcome back to the NYC Public Transportation WikiProject! I just saw your message on the talk page. epicgenius (talk) 02:20, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Rail transport in Walt Disney Parks and Resorts
Several weeks ago you left a couple of comments for the featured list candidate nomination for this article here: Featured list candidates/Rail transport in Walt Disney Parks and Resorts/archive1. So far you have been the only person to do so and due to inactivity for the nomination, they are going to archive it unless there is more activity soon. I think one of the main things needed is for people to type Support or Oppose in the nomination to get it closed, so when you have a moment, please indicate officially whether you support the nomination on that page. Thanks.  Jackdude 101  ( Talk ) 12:52, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!
Thanks! I really appreciate it. epicgenius (talk) 19:25, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
 * You are most welcome. Clearly there are two ways to act: collaboratively with good talk page demeanor, or not. You espouse the former. Thank you again. Sagecandor (talk) 19:26, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

The Center Line: Spring 2017
  Volume 9, Issue 1 • Spring 2017 • About the Newsletter

1=
 * Departments

• Assessment roundup

• Portal selected articles and pictures 1=
 * Features

• Commons and Wikidata revamp

• Route logs for junction lists

• Finding friends at the DOT

• This space for rent 1=
 * State and national updates

• State updates

• In other project news...

 Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS
 * —delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of on 01:03, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Lead section
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Lead section. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Charging Bull, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bund. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

April 19: WikiWednesday Salon and Skill-Share NYC
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

DYK for North Shore Branch
Mifter (talk) 00:04, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Collaboration products newsletter: 2017-04
Latest news from the Wikimedia Collaboration team, about Notifications, Flow and Edit Review Improvements. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you.

What's new?

The fourth fiscal quarter began the first of this month, and Collaboration Team has begun work on our new quarterly goals. In the coming months, we'll be working to release the New Filters for Edit Review beta on all wikis and then to improve the beta as much as possible based on user feedback. On that score, we're planning a round of user interviews on the new tools in May to get detailed information about usability and usefulness. If you've tried the new features and have thoughts, please share them with us in any language.

Our other focus right now is to look at what changes will be needed to spread the new filtering interface to other review pages, especially Watchlist. We're also exploring how to incorporate the tools we didn't include in the new interface in this round, like the Tag Filters, time-frame selector and Namespace filter.

Edit Review Improvements [ More information • Help pages ]

Recent changes
 * New Filters for Edit review are now available on Polish, Portuguese, Persian, Russian and Turkish Wikipedias as a Beta feature. French Wikipedia and Mediawikiwiki have the filters as a Beta feature too, but without the quality and intent filters.
 * Special:RecentChangesLinked now displays a message when no results are found for a given combination of filters.

Problems
 * Polish Wikipedia is experiencing an issue with predictions (quality and intent filters using ORES). The different predictions are in conflict. An edit can be considered as "good" and "bad" at the same time, and the filter levels are somewhat redundant. We have formulated a plan to address this and are working on a fix, which is deployed progressively on Polish Wikipedia.
 * The issue on Polish Wikipedia is shared by a few other wikis: Dutch, Czech and Hebrew, and Wikidata. The deployment for those wikis has been postponed to Tuesday, May 9. Wikis without this predictions problem have been deployed or will be deployed with no change on the schedule.
 * Interestingly, the "problem" with those wikis is that they perform better than we anticipated. Once the fix is in place, the tools will work with particular simplicity on these wikis.

Future changes
 * English Wikipedia and all wikis without ORES prediction services will get the New Filters for Edit review on Monday, April 24.
 * All remaining wikis will get the New Filters for Edit review on Tuesday, May 9.
 * Wikidata edits will be added as a type of change on New Filters for Edit review.

Notifications [ More information • Help pages ]


 * Notifications badges were overlapping other tabs on Internet Explorer 11 and Firefox 3.6, using MonoBook skin. This is now fixed.

Flow [ More information • Help pages ]


 * Flow is now available as a Beta feature on French Wikiversity.
 * All Flow documentation is now available on one page gathering all information, to help users to search for an information.
 * Flow's AbuseFilter integration now allows blocking a particular user from participating on a talk page, or any topic within it.

Collaboration team's newsletter prepared by the Collaboration team and posted by bot • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe. 13:04, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

IRT Manhattan Main Line KML file issue
The routing shown in this template is incorrect, it shows the line operating under Montague Street, when it is supposed to be operating under Joralemon Street. Imdanumber1 (talk) 20:39, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for pointing out the error. I'll fix it. epicgenius (talk) 01:51, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

File:An A Train in R46 Service at Inwood-207th Street.jpg
If you can do so, please nominate the following file to Commons: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:An_A_Train_in_R46_Service_at_Inwood-207th_Street.jpg

--Davidng913 (talk) 17:10, 19 April 2017 (UTC)


 * ✅ Moved to commons. The file on Wikipedia has been nominated for deletion since it is duplicated on commons. epicgenius (talk) 17:37, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

PATH font
Is there an official font for PATH? because I've seen both fonts used in stations. Cards84664 (talk) 13:24, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
 * As far as I am aware, I think there is an official font, but it's just not made public. However, I've replaced it with the Lucida Grande font, since it is the main font seen at station entrances. The true font is actually not Lucida Grande, but is in a very similar font family that is not used on Wikipedia. epicgenius (talk) 13:33, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
 * From what I've seen on this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1UOhE9EC4mY The fonts mainly used on platforms are split between the two. Cards84664 (talk) 13:35, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
 * All new signs are in the Frutiger font. Only the older signs are in Helvetica, so we should use Lucida Grande instead since it's close to Frutiger. (We could use Frutiger, but apparently it doesn't exist on Wikipedia and is replaced by the next font in the  tags that are used.) epicgenius (talk) 13:36, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
 * One thing I noticed just now is that Lucida Grande displays differently between mac and pc. Is there a way to fix that? Cards84664 (talk) 14:18, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I don't know how to change it. epicgenius (talk) 00:37, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:CGI of CFS landing.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:CGI of CFS landing.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text   below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Train2104 (t • c) 05:19, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Citywide Ferry map.png
Thanks for uploading File:Citywide Ferry map.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text   below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Train2104 (t • c) 05:19, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

File:SAS 1972 tunnel.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SAS 1972 tunnel.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ytoyoda (talk) 14:34, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Select Bus Service
This statement on the SBS article might be outdated.

An eighth Select Bus Service route was planned in the 2014–2017 Financial Plan; this new SBS corridor is to be determined. http://web.mta.info/mta/budget/pdf/Adopted_Budget_February_Financial_Plan_2014-2017.pdf

Do you know if this route that was being referred to was the M86? Surely this route has already been implemented? Thanks.--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 19:43, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm not quite sure. It may refer to the M86, since that was the eighth corridor and it was started in 2015 after the report was published. Anyhow, there are 12 corridors, so we can simply update this. epicgenius (talk) 22:28, 30 April 2017 (UTC)