User talk:Epicgenius/Archive/2018/Apr

Nice write-up
Congrats on the thing that I won't link here in case you'd rather it not be linked here. :) &mdash; Rhododendrites  talk \\ 17:35, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Seconding this. Congrats! oknazevad (talk) 23:04, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Ditto. Thank you for your contributions! --Ori Livneh (talk) 23:19, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks everyone, I really appreciate it. epicgenius (talk) 00:38, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Nice write-up - assuming this is what I think this is :) Congratulations!--regentspark (comment) 13:33, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

Great work - please consider placing a link on your user page! Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:18, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Maybe I will put the link on my page. I'll think about it. epicgenius (talk) 00:02, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Enhanced Station Initiative
There has been a major change to the ESI, as indicated here: https://www.wsj.com/articles/mta-runs-low-on-funds-cuts-back-station-upgrade-program-1522747921. The text is behind a paywall, but is shown here: http://www.subchat.com/read.asp?Id=1471611. I don't know how else you want to go about changing the section.--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 16:49, 3 April 2018 (UTC)--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 16:49, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the update. I'm not surprised, given that the MTA manages to overspend on everything, and on lightly-used stations no less. epicgenius (talk) 17:28, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

DYK for South Ferry/Whitehall Street (New York City Subway)
Alex Shih (talk) 00:02, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Fulton Center
— Maile (talk) 00:02, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

DYK QPQ
Hello. I see that you have two DYKs awaiting approval. I have one, as well (Ford Piquette Avenue Plant). I am not required to do a QPQ because I have less than five DYKs currently, but I'll gladly review your DYK for the BMT Franklin Avenue Line if you review mine. Also, FYI, there might be an issue with your other DYK for the History of the Second Avenue Subway, as the source for the first hook did not appear to be in the article. During my last DYK, everyone was very persnickety about the hook being as verbatim to the related text in the article, so I would suggest making note of that. Also pinging, since he is a co-contributor to these DYKs. Jackdude 101 talk cont 23:27, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Sure, I'll do a review of your DYK. Additionally, I don't understand what you mean by "the source for the first hook did not appear to be in the article". In Did you know nominations/History of the Second Avenue Subway, I put this URL as a source: https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/02/13/the-second-avenue-subway-is-here. In the article, the URL is ://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/02/13/the-second-avenue-subway-is-here, without the "S" in "HTTPS", but the two URLS are otherwise the same. epicgenius (talk) 23:40, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Okay, I see the source now. My bad. I was looking for the phrase "the first stations did not open until 97 years after the line was planned" in the article, or something similar, but I could not find one. If you read the article, you can confirm that, but it might be a good idea to add that phrase to the article, perhaps in the lead, to cover all bases (at least temporarily). Jackdude 101  talk cont 00:00, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
 * ✅, and I have also reviewed your nomination. I have brought up some comments there. epicgenius (talk) 00:39, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

Harlem River Images
Hi I am new to Wikipedia and this is my first talk message, not sure if I do this the correct wayJag9889 (talk) 10:38, 7 April 2018 (UTC). For the Harlem River, you added existing photos to the Crossing list. Do you mind, if I replace these with my images taken by kayak? I will not change any of your photos unless you give me your okay. Thanks! (Jag9889 (talk) 10:38, 7 April 2018 (UTC))
 * Feel free to edit the photos on the page. I used the existing photos mostly as placeholders, but if you have better images, go for it. epicgenius (talk) 14:23, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

History of MTA Divisions
Do you still plan to make those articles on History of the Metro-North Railroad, History of MTA Regional Bus Operations, and History of the Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority? -User:DanTD (talk) 02:27, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes, but I won't be able to publish a fully formed article within at least the next month because I'm busy in real life. I could create an outline, but this also requires a lot of research. If you want, you could start on creating a draft and I'll add on to it. epicgenius (talk) 02:42, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

DYK for 181st Street (IND Eighth Avenue Line)
Ritchie333 (talk) 00:03, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Rockefeller Center
Vanamonde (talk) 00:01, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

NY1 segment with User:Kew Gardens 613
That looks like it was a lot of fun. You both did a great job! How long did it take to plan? - Paul T [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Psantora&action=edit +]/C 13:11, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks! It only took about 3 days. I got the email on Monday, four days ago, that they wanted me on the show the next day. We had to reschedule, but I was about prepared since I also had other news interviews recently. Anyway, I really enjoyed meeting Kew Gardens 613 at the NY1 studio this morning, and I'm looking forward to meeting him again. epicgenius (talk) 16:35, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Other interviews too? Did you get a publicist or something? Oh, and I'm sure you know about this, but there is a place where you can change your username if you really wanted to: WP:NAMECHANGE - Paul T [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Psantora&action=edit +]/C 17:49, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm my own publicist. I was talking about the NY Times interview and a few others with Chinese newspapers. Regarding my name, I'm comfortable with it now, just saying that I wouldn't pick this name if I had to go back and do it again. Anyway, I have too many edits to be able to easily change my name, since when I tried last year, I was told that a sysadmin would actually have to approve the new username if accounts with over 50,000 total edits wanted name changes. epicgenius (talk) 17:57, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm my own publicist. (That's the joke...) Good for you! It makes sense that it would be a pain in the ass to change a name with so many edits. I should have known better. - Paul T [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Psantora&action=edit +]/C 04:23, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Villa Albergoni
Hi Epicgenius, could you please take a look again at the article and clean up the remaining bare links? Thank you. Gryffindor (talk) 21:50, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I fixed one reference. I can't see the other one because it's a link to a download, so you will have to fix that yourself. Also, for Did you know nominations/Villa Albergoni you have to review another open DYK nomination, since you have more than five credits. epicgenius (talk) 00:27, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I corrected the links, but something is still off with the dates format, could you please take a look? I don't know why it's doing it. Also in reference #13 from Vogue Italia, the issue number for some reason is not showing? Gryffindor (talk) 14:00, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
 * You have to change the dates manually. The correct format is "4 April" and "7 December", not "04 April" and "07 December", although ISO date format is also acceptable (e.g. 2016-12-07). As for the issue number not showing, you used cite web instead of cite journal, but only the latter template will give an issue number. I've fixed both issues. epicgenius (talk) 14:18, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Could you please check on the Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Alma_Mahler if I am doing it right? Gryffindor (talk) 17:12, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I left some comments there. epicgenius (talk) 17:24, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi Epicgenius, concerning the DYK Template:Did you know nominations/Alma Mahler, is there any other step I need to complete now? I am not very familiar with this process, thank you for your help. Gryffindor (talk) 12:15, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Sorry I didn't see this message earlier. I think your review is fine. You just have to change the ? to yes in DYKreview. epicgenius (talk) 00:36, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi. Done, I hope it's all good now. Thank you for your help. Gryffindor (talk) 12:37, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Greenpoint, Brooklyn
Good work on the street grid stuff. Beyond My Ken (talk) 19:07, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I appreciate it. epicgenius (talk) 22:47, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Tattoo
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Tattoo. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Flushing–Co-op City buses
Alex Shih (talk) 00:02, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Interstate 678
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Interstate 678 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Courcelles -- Courcelles (talk) 18:01, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Interstate 678
The article Interstate 678 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Interstate 678 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Courcelles -- Courcelles (talk) 19:02, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Q17 (New York City bus)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Q17 (New York City bus) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Courcelles -- Courcelles (talk) 22:01, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Q17 (New York City bus)
The article Q17 (New York City bus) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Q17 (New York City bus) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Courcelles -- Courcelles (talk) 01:41, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Conduit Avenue
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Conduit Avenue you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dom497 -- Dom497 (talk) 14:21, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Conduit Avenue
The article Conduit Avenue you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Conduit Avenue for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dom497 -- Dom497 (talk) 17:41, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Conduit Avenue
The article Conduit Avenue you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Conduit Avenue for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dom497 -- Dom497 (talk) 20:21, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Staten Island Ferry
Gatoclass (talk) 00:07, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

Sources for David Meade (author)
Hi, you said you would find better sources for David Meade. Is there any sources I should replace? If so, which ones and which sentences I should add the new source (also please link me the sources in diffs for all sentences that needs better ones)? Also, how does the date formats on the articles look? LovelyGirl7  talk  18:02, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I haven't found any better sources yet. The date formats look good, but it's really hard to find secondary sources for someone who goes by an alias. For the primary self-published sources, I suggest that you can add quotations to the citations so it is obvious that Meade has expressed these sentiments. epicgenius (talk) 18:45, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Quoting the self published sources sound great. I’m willing to do that. Also, what do you think about the sections? I’ve splitted the “Predictions” section into several sections. I’m hoping I can try again when I nominate it, but only if I address the concerns on the first one. When I eventually nominate it for the second time, I will allow you to review it again on if it improved from the first one. — LovelyGirl7  talk  19:37, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Looks good. I'd suggest you standardize the phrasing/capitalization of the section headings, like "October 2017 predictions" and "2018 predictions", but otherwise, the section order is fine. epicgenius (talk) 21:30, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I just want to let you know I made changes to the primary sources, adding quotes to the sources. What’s your thoughts regarding the self-published sources? Also, do you believe if I re-nominate it for FA, do you believe it will pass (I would love you to review it again when and if I do so again)? I would love these answered in a bullet/number list. LovelyGirl7  talk  12:50, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I won't be able to answer in detail right now, but I will get back to you shortly (within a few hours). epicgenius (talk) 16:29, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Good. Let me know when you do. — LovelyGirl7  talk  16:31, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Here are my comments. epicgenius (talk) 17:50, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Refs 22, 33, and 34 are self published, and may still need quotes.
 * I don't think you need Ref 13 (which supports Meade appeared on Coast to Coast AM with George Noory in January 2017 and was interviewed by the American national television and radio program Glenn Beck Program in September 2017.). Although refs 14 and 15 are primary sources, they show directly that Meade was interviewed by these programs.
 * Ref 27, after but the month passed, and his predictions failed again, doesn't actually support the content. Obviously the month passed without anything happening, so I don't think you really need to mention that. Maybe something like "He also unsuccessfully predicted that the 7-year tribulation would start on 15 October and stated "[t]hat's when the action starts" ", or "...incorrectly predicted..."
 * Not specifically to do with referencing, but He called several officials in the United Nations "crazy people" after voting against the United States' decision to recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, followed by the blood moon eclipse 42 days later is confusing. Was this insult followed by the prediction of something happening based on the blood moon eclipse?
 * Also not specifically a referencing thing. I noticed that you added this yesterday: On April 19, 2018, he stated that reports saying that he predicted the world would be destroyed on 23 April were "fake news", but that the rapture—but not the end of the world—would take place on an unspecified date between May and December 2018. The rapture would bring in seven years of “tribulation”, followed by 1,000 years of “peace and prosperity”, before the world is destroyed. If the predictions are still coming in, I don't think this would meet the stability criterion for a Featured Article - at least not until his real identity is shown, or the predictions slow down. More to the point, this article's issues are not just about referencing, but also stability.
 * (End of comments) epicgenius (talk) 17:50, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
 * , regarding your concerns, I've done the following:
 * Added quotes to Refs 22, 33, and 34
 * Removed Ref 13. With refs 14 and 15, what should I do with it?
 * Ref 27: I fixed it to incorrectly predicted on the last 2 parts of the sentence.
 * I fixed the sentence regarding Israel and 42 days later. I stated his prediction came 42 days after he insulted the UN for condemning US for recognizing Jerusalem.
 * I believe someone else added the statement, not me. I did fixed the last sentence, and added "He stated".
 * Thanks. -- LovelyGirl7  talk  21:32, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
 * For refs 14 and 15, I think you should leave them. Otherwise, this is good so far. If I find any more issues, I will let you know. epicgenius (talk) 22:46, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I’m glad to hear. I want to address all concerns before I nominate it for the second time. When I do nominate it for the second time, I would you to review it again. — LovelyGirl7  talk  00:13, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Anymore concerns in the article? I will address any concerns left before I nominate it for FA status. -- LovelyGirl7  talk  23:43, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Not at the moment, though I will tell you if I see any more concerns. Again, I do think you should hold off a little (just because of stability concerns), but I wouldn't object to you nominating the article again.
 * Is there any way I can fix the stability concerns? -- LovelyGirl7  talk  22:24, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, not at this moment. It's not your fault, but rather because coverage of Meade is so new. I think that the other reviewers at the David Meade FAC shared the same concerns - the article was updated three days ago about a major prediction that he made. epicgenius (talk) 22:38, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

Sundrome
Thank for making an edit to the Sundrome article. That building was plain on the outside but nice from the inside. The Wikipedia article is not very good but I plan to greatly improve it over the next few months, a little at a time.

I am sure that someone in this big planet has a photo that they are willing to donate to Wikipedia. If not, there are certainly links to photos which I can put. I tend not to like to "steal" a lot of non-free use especially for something like this, which used to be an easily accessible building. Vanguard10 (talk) 18:08, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. I checked Flickr for pictures of the Sundrome, but unfortunately, they are all fair use. It's particularly annoying, considering how the TWA Flight Center has 170 pictures on Commons. epicgenius (talk) 22:38, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

Barren Island
Hello! I see that you added a lot of information to the article about Barren Island in Brooklyn. I have just finished a history master's thesis on the island for Brooklyn College, and have made a couple of edits. Anyway, I just wanted to touch base because interest in and knowledge of Barren Island is rare! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Barren Islander (talk • contribs) 18:41, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the heads up. I actually just found out about the island myself when I was expanding the article on Floyd Bennett Field. It's good to know someone else is also interested in this subject. epicgenius (talk) 22:38, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Interstate 678
Hello! Your submission of Interstate 678 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!  Sounder Bruce  02:14, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Staten Island Railway
As you know, I nominated the Staten Island Railway article to be a featured article. While you can't review it, could you possibly see if anything in the article should be fixed? Thanks. One more thing. Should this file File:NYCS-bull-trans-SIR-2016-2017.png be smaller (or a lower resolution) because it is the property of the MTA? Thanks. Stay well.--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 23:26, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Sure, I will try to fix any mistakes. I guess File:NYCS-bull-trans-SIR-2016-2017.png does not need to be this big (100px width is fine enough). epicgenius (talk) 01:12, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
 * No need to reduce the SIR bullet. It's too simple (and purely informational) to qualify for copyright. Whether it should be used at full size in the article is a different, but valid, question, but we don't need to reduce the actual file itself. oknazevad (talk)
 * That's fair. epicgenius (talk) 01:17, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Brooklyn–Battery Tunnel
Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

DYK for History of the Second Avenue Subway
Gatoclass (talk) 12:01, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/23rd Street (Manhattan) at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with db-g7, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 16:43, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Jacob Riis Park
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jacob Riis Park you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Barkeep49 -- Barkeep49 (talk) 19:40, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

Question
Do you think David Meade (author) is ready for a second FA nomination? -- LovelyGirl7  talk  16:40, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Personally, I'd advise to wait a bit longer, due to how often the facts about Meade get updated. epicgenius (talk) 13:16, 30 April 2018 (UTC)