User talk:Epicgenius/Archive/2019/Aug

DYK for Uptown Hudson Tubes
valereee (talk) 00:01, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Central Park Conservancy
The article Central Park Conservancy you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Central Park Conservancy for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of BlackfullaLinguist -- BlackfullaLinguist (talk) 12:41, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

The Williamsburg Bridge for you
I just want to ask you that you should enter a mention of the landmark Public School 71K in the Williamsburg article. Thanks again! תנא קמא (talk) 18:57, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 2
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Morningside Park (Manhattan), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Segregation ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Morningside_Park_%28Manhattan%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Morningside_Park_%28Manhattan%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Brooklyn Army Terminal
The article Brooklyn Army Terminal you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Brooklyn Army Terminal for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of David Fuchs -- David Fuchs (talk) 15:00, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Shirley Chisholm State Park
Hello! Your submission of Shirley Chisholm State Park at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! SL93 (talk) 19:33, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

RfC
.... Village pump (miscellaneous)/Archive 62..-- Moxy 🍁 14:10, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Q35 (New York City bus)
Hello! Your submission of Q35 (New York City bus) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 23:53, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

Congrats
Congrats on getting the PATH article to be a Good Article. It took a lot of work on your part. Thanks so much. Concerning In regards to the PA system (speaking of ... I'll address the use of "PA" further down), that sounds fun, but maybe not a big enough detail to be included. Maybe Kew Gardens 613 knows something. Sorry, I don't know. Keep up the great work.--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 23:44, 5 August 2019 (UTC)--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 23:44, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
 * , thanks, I appreciate it. Couldn't have done it without your help, though.As for the PA system, it's not any problem, it's a minor detail anyway. epicgenius (talk) 23:50, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:List of New York City Subway stations/same name
Template:List of New York City Subway stations/same name has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. BLAIXX 10:59, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Throgs Neck Bridge
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Throgs Neck Bridge you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 11:20, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Brooklyn Army Terminal
The article Brooklyn Army Terminal you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Brooklyn Army Terminal for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of David Fuchs -- David Fuchs (talk) 19:22, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Throgs Neck Bridge
The article Throgs Neck Bridge you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Throgs Neck Bridge for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 09:40, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Throgs Neck Bridge
The article Throgs Neck Bridge you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Throgs Neck Bridge for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 18:42, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

DYK for C (New York City Subway service)
— Maile (talk) 00:02, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Q35 (New York City bus)
— Maile (talk) 00:02, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

The Beast
I appreciate some of the updates you're making at several amusement ride articles, however, I was a bit confused by this one. The RCDB citation you added doesn't cover all claims in that paragraph, yet you removed all of the cn tags. I restored them in this edit, and I also changed the ref name you selected for the YouTube video. I'm not sure why you chose ":0". --GoneIn60 (talk) 03:41, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Also, I noticed you were specifying the URL when using the RCDB template, but you actually don't have to for specific roller coaster articles on that site. For example, The Beast is number 67 on that site, so you could simply fill in the "rcdb_number" parameter as 67. See the template for more details. Hope that helps. --GoneIn60 (talk) 03:48, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
 * , thanks for the comments. VisualEditor automatically chose ":0" as the ref name. I didn't realize that all of the citation needed tags were removed in my edit. And thanks again for showing me the RCDB template, I didn't know the url wasn't needed if there was an rcdb_number. I appreciate the feedback. epicgenius (talk) 04:10, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

More Suspected Sock Puppetry
This user, Subway NYC64 May yet be another sock puppet because he has the subway links in his description and is yet another person trying to change pictures of the articles. Please help, because this is going way too far now.-Davidng913 (talk) 23:35, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

Okay calm down guys. I just made a few edits on the R Train article but I’m not a sock puppet. I just thought that picture of 63rd Drive was too shaded and dull. I promise to go to the talk page and then reach a decision. User:Subway NYC64 talk 21:13 11 August 2019 (UTC)

> Hi Koov! Mtattrain (talk) 05:10, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

What I’m not the sock puppet Koov. I’m just another user. For the past months I was editing the movie Battlefield Earth. I just thought that David Ng did a poor picture when he edited the R Train article. So please don’t permanently block me from Wikipedia. User: Subway NYC64 talk 3:00, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

Bryant Park
Thanks for your additions to this article. However, a few things about your citations:


 * Please provide the name of the author. When there is no author listed, as in early NY Times articles, please put "Staff" as the author. When using citation templates, this will format the resulting citation properly
 * Please do not capitalizes titles, even if the capitalization is in the original. That is an art5ifact of headline writing, and is not relevant for our cites
 * Please use mdy format (i.e. Month day, Year) for dates, not mm-dd-yy

Thanks. Beyond My Ken (talk) 00:52, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
 * , thanks for the notes. All of these are due to how VisualEditor processes citations. I'll fix these when I'm done, but in the meantime the last issue should be fixed easily by placing Use mdy dates. epicgenius (talk) 00:58, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Use mdy dates is alreay in the article, but it does nothing to change the dates, only notifies editors to use the proper format.Also, there's no need to copy the entire very long headline, sub-headline, sub-sub headline etc. structure used at the time. Just the initial headline and maybe the sub-headline (if it's useful) are enough.  Last thing, "language=en" is assumed.Thanks for all the very good info, you've really beefed up the article considerably. Beyond My Ken (talk) 01:13, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
 * , no problem, I appreciate the feedback. As for the MDY dates template, there was a recent change in citation formatting, which modifies all the citations to use whatever date format is specified in the template. I will fix the titles (including shortening & de-capitalizing) after adding citations to the rest of the article, and will remove the language parameter afterward, as it's much easier to do it in one shot. epicgenius (talk) 02:29, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the update on dates templates - I wasn't aware of it. Beyond My Ken (talk) 03:43, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

PATH update
Apparently there aren't any pages on transit systems at Wikivoyage, so there's no need to create a PATH page there (what a shame ... I really think there should be; just look at the coverage that good travel guidebooks devote to explaining the subway system to visitors, not just in New York but anywhere that has one worth the name). So, when I can, I'll write an article about that SCOTUS case so it's no longer redlinked, and continue translating the article into French one graf at a time. Daniel Case (talk) 20:01, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Industry City
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Industry City you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Casliber -- Casliber (talk) 20:41, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aviation
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aviation. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Bronx Park
— Maile (talk) 12:02, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Eastern Parkway
valereee (talk) 12:02, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Central Park Zoo
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Central Park Zoo you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 10:00, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Central Park Zoo
The article Central Park Zoo you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Central Park Zoo for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 11:40, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Central Park Zoo
The article Central Park Zoo you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Central Park Zoo for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 19:42, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

South Bronx Greenway
Not sure what you intended there, but putting the coord template in the middle of the References header is probably not it :-) -- RoySmith (talk) 22:26, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
 * , thanks for telling me. I was trying to rearrange the external links section, but I didn't notice the coord template at the bottom... epicgenius (talk) 23:35, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Prospect Park (Brooklyn)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Prospect Park (Brooklyn) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 12:40, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Prospect Park (Brooklyn)
The article Prospect Park (Brooklyn) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Prospect Park (Brooklyn) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 20:00, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Prospect Park (Brooklyn)
The article Prospect Park (Brooklyn) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Prospect Park (Brooklyn) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 08:41, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Industry City
The article Industry City you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Industry City for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Casliber -- Casliber (talk) 06:22, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bronx–Whitestone Bridge
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bronx–Whitestone Bridge you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 11:00, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Shirley Chisholm State Park
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:04, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bronx–Whitestone Bridge
The article Bronx–Whitestone Bridge you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Bronx–Whitestone Bridge for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 21:01, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Riegelmann Boardwalk
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 00:01, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Coney Island Cyclone
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Coney Island Cyclone you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 15:00, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Thanks for creating Queen Mary Hospital station.

User:Boleyn while examining this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 20:18, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
 * , the article creator was . epicgenius (talk) 20:21, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Sorry :) Boleyn (talk) 20:22, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Coney Island Cyclone
The article Coney Island Cyclone you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Coney Island Cyclone for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 06:00, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of New York Public Library Main Branch
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article New York Public Library Main Branch you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vami IV -- Vami IV (talk) 22:41, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Morningside Park (Manhattan)
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Coney Island Cyclone
The article Coney Island Cyclone you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Coney Island Cyclone for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 18:42, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Central Park Conservancy
— Maile (talk) 12:01, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

Measurements
Just a note on this edit summary - no set of measures is "more accurate" than another. Feet should be used instead of meters in that article, because that is what's standard in the US, where the memorial is located, not because things can be measured more accurately using feet and inches than they can be by using meters. Also, Imperial units are the British & Canadian system, related to, but not exactly the same as U.S. customary units. Best, Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:12, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
 * , thanks for the comment. I was referring to the fact that in the context of the article, US customary units is more accurate than metric measurement, since the exact height is given as 96 ft. However, 29 m can be converted to 95 or 96 ft so it's less accurate in that context. epicgenius (talk) 02:28, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

August 28: WikiWednesday Salon and Skill-Share NYC (+editathons before and after)
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

DYK for Throgs Neck Bridge
— Maile (talk) 12:02, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

WTC and Talese book
Unless there was some kind of update in the 2014 edition, the Talese book about the Verrazzano Bridge was published long before the construction of the WTC. I'll look for a second-hand copy. In any case, I suspect that any ironworker who might have been interviewed somewhere was probably talking about the floor system. In the 1970s and 1980s there was a proprietary system using bar joist structural members with the top chord arranged in composite action with the concrete deck, a variant of which was used in the WTC. It was popular for a time. Bar joist floor construction in general, and composite bar joist floor systems in particular, fell out of use over their tendency to deflection and vibration, and the difficulty in properly fireproofing them. I worked with such a system in low-rise construction around 1981. An ironworker used to pre-1970 construction (and post-1990 construction) would find such a system flimsy. However, I would want to see the "flimsy" comment placed in context, if sources can be found, and if the quote can be properly documented.  Acroterion   (talk)   12:03, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
 * , thanks for the comment, it's very helpful to determine the context. The first edition was published in 1964 so it's unlikely that the interview was 2014. However, I have a copy of the 1964 edition in my college so I'll check it out later today to see if the quote about WTC is in there. epicgenius (talk) 12:28, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bronx–Whitestone Bridge
The article Bronx–Whitestone Bridge you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Bronx–Whitestone Bridge for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 20:22, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

CB / ZIP Codes / NYPD Precincts in Lead of Harlem
Regarding this edit, I agree that the information belongs in the article. I acknowledge that the Political representation section was less than ideal, but I'm not sure that details regarding Community Board, ZIP Codes and NYPD precincts belongs in the lead. Is there any other way to incorporate these details outside of the lead, both here and in other such articles? Alansohn (talk) 03:00, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
 * , I left a comment at Talk:Harlem. As I said there, the point of the lead is to briefly summarize the following sections. The info about community boards is in the infoboxes of most other NYC neighborhood articles, and so is the zip code info and police precincts. At the minimum, the inclusion of community boards gives context for the Community District-specific content in parts of the article - such as the police, health, and education sections. epicgenius (talk) 03:02, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Central Park GA review
Hi Epicgenius. I've started a GA review of Central Park. It's a decent article, well researched and presented. There are some issues regarding the use of images both in terms of amount of images, layout of images, and copyright status. And there's a few other minor issues. But essentially this is a good article. I've popped it on hold for the initial seven days to let you deal with the issues, then I'll give it a final look, particularly the lead, but I'm not seeing any significant reason why this shouldn't be listed shortly. Talk:Central_Park/GA2. SilkTork (talk) 11:49, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
 * , thanks for reviewing the article. I'm not sure why the bot never notified me of this. I'll be out of town for the next few days though, so might not have time to address all of these issues immediately. epicgenius (talk) 12:06, 31 August 2019 (UTC)