User talk:Epicgenius/Archive/2022/May

DYK for Gershwin Theatre
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

DYK nomination of 200 Madison Avenue
Hello! Your submission of 200 Madison Avenue at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Morgan695 (talk) 22:50, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 1540 Broadway
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1540 Broadway you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 04:40, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 1540 Broadway
The article 1540 Broadway you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:1540 Broadway for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 05:20, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 1540 Broadway
The article 1540 Broadway you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1540 Broadway for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 18:21, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

59th Street station (BMT Fourth Avenue Line)
I just noticed an issue with the infobox, Q is a northbound-only service at this station, but it's only listed as southbound in the station succession.  Cards   84664   17:50, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
 * That is weird. I think the Sea Beach service pattern may have to be split into northbound and southbound templates, similar to what was done for Template:NYCS Second northbound and Template:NYCS Second southbound. – Epicgenius (talk) 18:11, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
 * And for the Fourth south express as well?  Cards   84664   18:21, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Everything should be handled now. – Epicgenius (talk) 18:37, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks  Cards   84664   18:41, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

DYK for American Airlines Theatre
— Maile (talk) 00:03, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

PATH
Do we have enough info for 19th Street station (PATH) and 28th Street station (PATH) to create articles?  Cards   84664   01:19, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
 * There might be. I haven't looked into it in depth, but I recall the H&M was extensively described in railroad and electrical journals of the time. – Epicgenius (talk) 01:26, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

May 22: Wiki-Picnic and Hackathon in Brooklyn
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team 02:19, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Poop icon?
Hello, Epicgenius,

I can't believe you created a poop icon. You were a different type of editor in 2013, weren't you?! Liz Read! Talk! 01:42, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
 * @Liz, yeah, I definitely was. I was a teenager and I was really into rude humor at the time. I have a bunch of other embarrassing pages that have been deleted now, but they're along very similar lines. I'm just surprised I didn't get WP:NOTHERE'd out of existence back then... – Epicgenius (talk) 03:13, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:NYCS Platform Layout Terminal Station/color
Template:NYCS Platform Layout Terminal Station/color has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 23:03, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

JPMorgan Chase
I need some clarification so that I can understand. Exactly what does this maintenance template mean?

This article's tone or style may not reflect the encyclopedic tone used on Wikipedia. See Wikipedia's guide to writing better articles for suggestions. (March 2022) ( Learn how and when to remove this template message ).

Any information that you could provide would be greatly appreciated.

Saved by God&#39;s grace (talk) 09:16, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
 * @Saved by God's grace, this tag often means that the article describes its subject in an overly positive or negative way. It can also indicate that the article contains many subjective opinions, or that it is using colloquial language or jargon.WP:TONE elaborates a bit more on this: Wikipedia is not a manual, guidebook, textbook, or scientific journal. Articles and other encyclopedic content should be written in a formal tone. Standards for formal tone vary a bit depending upon the subject matter but should usually match the style used in Featured- and Good-class articles in the same category. Encyclopedic writing has a fairly academic approach, while remaining clear and understandable. Formal tone means that the article should not be written using argot, slang, colloquialisms, doublespeak, legalese, or jargon that is unintelligible to an average reader; it means that the English language should be used in a businesslike manner.For my part, I'm not seeing any of these tone issues, so I have removed the template. An anonymous editor added it without giving explanation on the talk page. If they had explained on the talk page, perhaps it would be clearer what the issue is. – Epicgenius (talk) 15:11, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Times Square Theater
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 21 May 2022 (UTC) theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 04:02, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter May 2022
Hello ,

At the time of the last newsletter (No.26, September 2021), the backlog was 'only' just over 6,000 articles. In the past six months, the backlog has reached nearly 16,000, a staggering level not seen in several years. A very small number of users had been doing the vast majority of the reviews. Due to "burn-out", we have recently lost most of this effort. Furthermore, several reviewers have been stripped of the user right for abuse of privilege and the articles they patrolled were put back in the queue.

Several discussions on the state of the process have taken place on the talk page, but there has been no action to make any changes. The project also lacks coordination since the "position" is vacant.

In the last 30 days, only 100 reviewers have made more than 8 patrols and only 50 have averaged one review a day. There are currently Special:ListUsers/patroller New Page Reviewers, but about a third have not had any activity in the past month. All administrators have this permission, but only about a dozen significantly contribute to NPP.

This means we have an active pool of about 450 to address the backlog. We cannot rely on a few to do most of the work as that inevitably leads to burnout. A fairly experienced reviewer can usually do a review in a few minutes. If every active reviewer would patrol just one article per day, the backlog would very quickly disappear.

If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, do suggest they help the effort by placing on their talk page.

If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. Sent 05:17, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Adjacent stations
And when you have a bit (a lot) of spare time, can you review my first draft of NYCS's module at User:Cards84664/NYCS 1, /NYCS 2, /NYCS 3, /NYCS 4, /NYCS 5, /NYCS 6, /NYCS 7, /NYCS 8? Thanks.  Cards   84664   12:20, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Sure, I can check it later. – Epicgenius (talk) 13:22, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Are there any issues with how it's designed? Also worth noting that this will eliminate all the article redirects currently present.  Cards   84664   23:54, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
 * So far, I don't see anything that's really problematic. There might be a little controversy with using trunk colors for non-trunk lines (e.g. red for New Lots Line stations) but I don't think they're necessarily bad. – Epicgenius (talk) 01:54, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Mainly, it's to reflect the service color of the primary service. Also, with User:Cards84664/NYCS_6 for example, I had time 2 invoked directly, since that Z template currently doesn't exist outside of Z skip. Do you think additional services NYCS templates should be created for those Jamaica stations or is it fine as is?  Cards   84664   02:18, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
 * That is weird. Yes, additional service templates should be created for the Jamaica service patterns. – Epicgenius (talk) 03:13, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I've got something that'll work:
 * I'll split J skip ( ( skips to X) ) into J skipped and J skip ,
 * Z skip ( ( skips to X) ) split into J skipped and Z skip .   Cards   84664   04:52, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
 * ✅.  Cards   84664   06:33, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

And finally, with User:Cards84664/NYCS_8, the shuttles are listed out by name for disambiguation. Anything else that looks odd or do you think it's ready to implement?  Cards   84664   13:16, 17 May 2022 (UTC) Just noticed that service and services are too similar in the NYCS infobox parameters, should services be station_succession or adjacent_stations?  Cards   84664   13:24, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I think services would be more intuitive if it were renamed adjacent_stations. Everything else looks good to me. – Epicgenius (talk) 13:26, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Great work. The part-time E service pattern at 75th Avenue is missing.--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 19:32, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
 * It's there in the left and right notes, F is the regular daytime service in this example.  Cards   84664   19:53, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

✅  Cards   84664   22:20, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
 * @Cards84664, another editor mentioned to me off-wiki that some of the templates may have been incorrect or may have omitted information. For instance, the station succession for the 42nd Street–Port Authority Bus Terminal station did not show that the C/E split at 50th Street (it only showed the C and nighttime A, the E wasn't mentioned at all). Apparently, we both overlooked this, but there may be more errors of this sort. – Epicgenius (talk) 00:58, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
 * That was my mistake not to update the NYCS template, not Adjacent stations, see corrections here and here. I'm also keeping User:Cards84664/NYCS 1, /NYCS 2, /NYCS 3, /NYCS 4, /NYCS 5, /NYCS 6, /NYCS 7, /NYCS 8 up to date for easy error spotting if you want to check there. I've also traced every service to ensure that there are no mis-linked articles as well.  Cards   84664   01:18, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

I'm not sure on adding termini for rush services, since templates such as the one at Eighth Avenue station (BMT Sea Beach Line) would bloat with limited termini because of the rush Q for example.  Cards   84664   01:41, 23 May 2022 (UTC) How about this?  Cards   84664   01:47, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
 * That works. I only added the A's northern terminal for the Rockaway Park branch because this branch was listed on the official subway map, unlike the other peak variants. – Epicgenius (talk) 12:56, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Village East by Angelika
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

May 25: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team 00:47, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:SIR north
Template:SIR north has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 06:54, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:SIR south
Template:SIR south has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 06:54, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:SIR transfer
Template:SIR transfer has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 06:54, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Lyric Theatre (New York City, 1998)
The article Lyric Theatre (New York City, 1998) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Lyric Theatre (New York City, 1998) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Golden -- Golden (talk) 11:21, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Bison
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:12, 25 May 2022 (UTC)


 * – Epicgenius (talk) 23:48, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Seagram Building TFA
It's great to see this article as TFA at the moment. I really enjoyed reading and reviewing it at the FAC, and understanding why my sister dragged me to see it when we visited NYC from Australia in 2009! Regards, Nick-D (talk) 08:41, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
 * @Nick-D, thanks! I'm glad you like it. – Epicgenius (talk) 13:20, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Times Square Theater
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Times Square Theater you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. UnidentifiedX (talk) 05:53, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Times Square Theater
The article Times Square Theater you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Times Square Theater for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of UnidentifiedX -- UnidentifiedX (talk) 06:41, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

Spuyten Duyvil rail bridge a pedestrian bridge?
Hi, Epicgenius! Wayback in 2017, you marked Spuyten Duyvil Bridge as Category:Pedestrian bridges in New York City with the es: "Cat-a-lot: Copying from Category:Bridges in New York City to Category:Pedestrian bridges in New York City)."

I'm not an expert, but I'm under the impression this is a rail bridge not a pedestrian bridge, and even if it somehow supports pedestrians, I think pedestrians would need to trespass on the railroad right-of-way to get there.

It sounds like you were just doing a mass category change, but I'm still not sure how this came about. Do you have anything to support that category on that page, or do you think it merits a discussion on the article's talk page, rather than summary removal? Thanks! jhawkinson (talk) 02:36, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
 * @Jhawkinson, yeah that was a simple mistake. I was, indeed, changing categories en masse. It is not a pedestrian bridge - never has been, probably never will. I'll remove that category now. – Epicgenius (talk) 04:38, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Paula Lizell
Hey Epic, is it okay if you take a look at this nomination? I'm a bit torn on what hook to approve and I would ask for some advice. In addition, I want to explain about how most readers aren't knowledgeable in opera and that the hook should ideally not assume too much from our audience, but I don't know how to say so in words. Perhaps you can explain the point better than I can? Thanks!  Naruto love hinata 5 (talk · contributions) 14:53, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

My point of view, however, is to not "assume" anything, but feed our readers interesting unique specific information which they hopefully have not heard before, and let them decide if they want to know more - which links provide - or not. - sorry forgot to sign, but who else (doesn't want to leave readers alone with trivia) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:34, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I can take a look at this nomination in a bit. – Epicgenius (talk) 15:27, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Editing newsletter 2022 – #1
Read this in another language • Subscription list for the multilingual newsletter • Local subscription list



The New topic tool helps editors create new ==Sections== on discussion pages. New editors are more successful with this new tool. You can read the report. Soon, the Editing team will offer this to all editors at most WMF-hosted wikis. You can join the discussion about this tool for the English Wikipedia is at Village pump (proposals). You will be able to turn it off in the tool or at Special:Preferences.

The Editing team plans to change the appearance of talk pages. These are separate from the changes made by the Desktop improvements project and will appear in both Vector 2010 and Vector 2022. The goal is to add some information and make discussions look visibly different from encyclopedia articles. You can see some ideas at Wikipedia talk:Talk pages project.

Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk)

23:14, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Paramount Plaza
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 20 May 2022 (UTC) theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 03:13, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for New York New York! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:27, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

... more specifically today for the iconic Seagram Building, "about a landmark International-style skyscraper in Manhattan, New York City, erected in the 1950s. As the name suggests, the building was erected for the Seagram Company and designed by several architects, most notably Ludwig Mies van der Rohe. This building's development was influenced by Phyllis Lambert, the daughter of Seagram's CEO at the time, who pushed for the building to be a New York City landmark in the 1970s and 1980s, and who even today maintains a connection with the building, over 60 years after its completion. It's been called one of "New York's most copied buildings" and, even before it became an official New York City landmark in 1989, had a large influence on other International style buildings."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:29, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
 * @Gerda Arendt, thanks! I really appreciate it. – Epicgenius (talk) 22:29, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I like my talk today (actually mostly from 29 May - I took the title pic), enjoy the music, two related videos worth watching! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:33, 31 May 2022 (UTC)