User talk:Epigeek84

Thanks for edits
Thanks for your edits, but I'm concerned that your edits might cross some boundaries. For example it seems that you may be the author of the research in question WP:PROMOTION, also you are linking to primary sources rather than secondary sources WP:PRIMARY, and you may be giving undue prominence WP:UNDUE to your own results. Any thoughts? PeepleLikeYou (talk) 00:07, 8 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Unfortunately I have to agree with PeepleLikeYou. Even after the reversions, this behaviour was repeated, a while later. I am now watching the Sensitivity_and_specificity page for this reason.

--DracoDruida (talk) 13:39, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Promotion
Hello, I'm DracoDruida. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Sensitivity_and_specificity have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.