User talk:Episteme67

Welcome!

Hello, Episteme67, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as BAARD Boston Alliance Against Registration and the Draft), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! MikeWazowski (talk) 22:53, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of BAARD Boston Alliance Against Registration and the Draft)


A tag has been placed on BAARD Boston Alliance Against Registration and the Draft) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  MikeWazowski (talk) 22:53, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Boston Alliance Against Registration and the Draft for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Boston Alliance Against Registration and the Draft is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Boston Alliance Against Registration and the Draft until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. NW ( Talk ) 03:20, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Socialist Party of Massachusetts
Hi Episteme67!

Your edit of Socialist Party of Massachusetts removed sourced content, restoring a version of the page that contradicted the sourced high quality highly reliable content.

Your edit summary provide no motivation.

Please use the talk page to build consensus. (I made similar edits to most of the SPUSA state-affiliates' pages, and none has been reverted, yet, so I found your reversion suprising.)

Thanks! Kiefer .Wolfowitz 06:54, 13 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Hi,
 * Your edit recreates a previous conflict from the past. Your are entering in a bias and national political material
 * that is not relevant to a state political party.

Episteme67 (talk)Epistem67


 * HI Episteme67,
 * Your political opinions and organizational affiliations are irrelevant. Please see WP:NPOV. Since you mention writing from the position of SPUSA-MA, you should refer to WP:COI.
 * (Please don't make allegations about other editors' politics; such statements are often considered violations of policies, WP:AGF and WP:NPA.)
 * Thanks, Kiefer .Wolfowitz 05:13, 17 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Hi,
 * I think that my point is correct; your edit brings in national political view to a state organization, and is irrelevant
 * to the state organization's history. Hence I stand by my edit. This can be a mutually agreeable position. If you are doing
 * that to all state organizations of the SP USA, you are reproducing the same problem.

Episteme67 (talk) 12:56, 17 August 2011 (UTC)epsiteme67


 * Please stop edit warring.
 * We have discussed this matter on the SP-Mass page and worked to come up with a consensus language. Please use such NPOV language rather than the previous POV and false description "dissolution".
 * Please remove the first indentation from each of your talk-page discussions, which cause abnormal and poorly legible typesetting. Kiefer .Wolfowitz 20:00, 18 August 2011 (UTC)