User talk:Equanimous1

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or  located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 04:56, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

February 2012
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Doctor of Physical Therapy with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. RA talkcontribs 04:55, 17 February 2012 (UTC)


 * I have made multiple comments about how the information is false and bigoted. There is more than valid reason for removal of the information. If you like we should give the article to the American Physical Therapy Association and let them write an article about it. I originally wrote an article that was changed and continues to be changed without valid reason.


 * It's properly sourced, so don't just delete it. Per WP:BRD you should discuss it on the talk page, not edit war. You can get blocked for edit warring. I'm a PT and think that content is perfectly appropriate. -- Brangifer (talk) 06:20, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Edit warring. Warning
Your recent editing history at Doctor of Physical Therapy shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You will be blocked if you continue to delete properly sourced content or restore disputed content. Read about WP:BRD. Discuss this on the article's talk page. The article has been returned to its consensus version before this current situation. Do not restore or delete until a consensus has been reached on the talk page. -- Brangifer (talk) 07:03, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Suspicion of sockpuppetry
You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Sockpuppet investigations/Equanimous1. Thank you.  Jay Jay Talk to me 05:08, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

This is my first account.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 4 days for Edit warring while using multiple IPs and an account.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- DQ  (ʞlɐʇ)  07:58, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Vandalism
STOP vandalising articles on Wikipedia. Deliberately deleting bits and pieces of articles is considered vandalism.

Proof: Physical therapy

--MaxAMSC (talk) 01:47, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

I have not been vandalising. I have made constructive comments with sources citied. My edits have been removed at times without reason. The recent edits I made were constructive and accurate and I would be glad to discuss them.

Deleting part of an article is constructive? --MaxAMSC (talk) 01:52, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Where are the "sources citied [cited]?" I would be glad to discuss with you. --MaxAMSC (talk) 01:56, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

The sentence in the opening section that states that physical therapists work at times with occupatonal therapists and speech therapists is unneeded. They also work with MDs, DOs, DPMs, DMDs, DDSs, DCs, NPs, RNs, COTAs, CNAs, social workers, and other clinicians. Other pages explaining other professions do not have the other professions listed. What is more is that by degree a 'speech therapist' graduates with a degree in speech language pathology. For this to be an accurate encyclopedia that should be reflected. There is no need in the opening paragraph to list all the professions that another clinician works with. (Equanimous1 (talk) 02:02, 11 March 2012 (UTC))

Conversation continued on Physical therapy talk page. --MaxAMSC (talk) 02:19, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Transition D.P.T.


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page that you created was tagged as a test page and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Intoronto1125 Talk Contributions  16:36, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

March 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Intoronto1125 Talk Contributions  18:37, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

I apologize. I was trying to edit the page and deleted it in error. (Equanimous1 (talk) 18:42, 30 March 2012 (UTC))

Speedy deletion nomination of Transition D.P.T.


A tag has been placed on Transition D.P.T. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ... disco spinster   talk  20:59, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

Suggestion
I suggest using the "show preview" option when contributing, this will lower exhaustion on the servers. It will also save history space and allow you to change your contributions prior to submitting them. SwisterTwister  talk  03:08, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 4
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * List of Physical Therapy Schools in the United States (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Fellowship, MHA and Residency


 * Doctor of Physical Therapy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Imaging

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:55, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 21
Hi. When you recently edited Terminal degree, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages MD and DPT (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of DPT-MPH


The article DPT-MPH has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not encyclopedic, not notable; information is contained within child articles

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LT910001 (talk) 22:16, 18 October 2013 (UTC) LT910001 (talk) 22:16, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of List of physical therapy schools in the United States for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of physical therapy schools in the United States is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of physical therapy schools in the United States until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ajf773 (talk) 05:22, 16 June 2017 (UTC)