User talk:Equazcion/sandbox2

The best place reviewers' comments and a suggestion
There was a recent problem at an AfC for Aggregative games where comments were solicited at WT:MATH, some of us added comments to the article, and the closer approved the article without considering the comments. At least part of the problem is that our comments were not inside Template:Afc comment templates. The problems with the article are now resolved, but the discussion at WT:MATH brought up a question and a suggestion.

The question is: where in the article should comments be placed? I have always placed my comments between the big AfC header and the top of the lead of the article. But the closer, MatthewVanitas, was looking for the comments before the AfC header.

The suggestion is: it would be nice for the AfC header to indicate an acceptable way for a newbie (say, a solicited domain expert) to comment on the article. Right now, as far as I can tell, one has to (1) Expand the "Reviewer tools" box, (2) decide that "Instructions" might be the most likely link, (3) Read instructions until one gets down to the "Adding questions or comments" subsection in the "See also" section, and (4) have to start the installation and learning process for the AfC helper script. Although I'm still a newbie at this, I respectfully suggest adding something like the following to the AfC header: ''To make comments on this article, please use Template:Afc comment or the AfC helper script to do so. Please place your comment at location XXX''.

Thanks for your comments and guidance, --Mark viking (talk) 21:05, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Good idea. We often assume too much. I couldn't even handle templates when I started out in Wikipedia! Cheers, FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 00:12, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Perhaps, in the future, the reviewers will have a handy tool which will (1) create a new section on the talk page of a Wikiproject with the title Submission name; (2) Leave a generic message saying that the members of the project are invited to review (if an Afc reviewer) or comment on the submission by adding Comment text to the top of the article. By adding to the top, when declined the text will be right under the pink box (I hope).  &mdash;Anne Delong (talk) 05:10, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Devilstone Open Air Festival

 * A new(?) version of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Devilstone Open Air was pasted here. I removed it.  The text can be found in the revision history [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation&oldid=577970062 here].  I will leave a note on the editor's talk page. davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs) 16:35, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

CSD:G13 modification proposal
I just came across a new proposal on WT:CSD that members of this project may have interest in. It is not my proposal, but since the proposer forgot to make mention here, and I believe it is important for members of the project this criterion is based upon to be aware of the discussion, I'm doing it for the proposer. Technical 13 (talk) 16:41, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

The list
Until recently, there used to be two pages for looking at submissions. One was for the pending submissions, for the reviewers to work on. The other was a more general page, and had statistics about past submissions, details about recent submissions, and links to various categories related to submissions, including the category of submissions without templates. This page was useful to people trying to keep the project organized, and helped keep the "Pending Submission" page uncluttered and true to its title. I used this page extensively, but now I can't find it. It was under the Submissions tab, under the word "list". Now this link points somewhere else. Is there some reason this useful and informative page has been removed? And where can I find the link to the submissions without templates? &mdash;Anne Delong (talk) 01:26, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
 * This page: WikiProject Articles for creation/Submissions? — Earwig   talk  01:37, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Anne, the "list" page, WikiProject Articles for creation/Submissions/List, "transcludes" the page you were looking at, Template:AFC statistics. Transcluding large pages doesn't work well, so the transclusion fails when the backlog is large.  In early October a lot of the functionality was taken out of the "parent" page entirely, but it remains in the template.  Sometime in the last few days the "parent page" was turned into a redirect to the template, which is why you are puzzled.  I undid the redirect, so now you can see things as they were as of October 4.  davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs) 01:42, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The last 36 hours list sub tab is up there, and it says that the list won't be displayed there if it is too large and to click a link through to the template davidwr mentions. The template is supposed to be compiled by EarwigBot, but it hasn't changed since last thursday. In any case the template doesn't load for me in this browser because it's too big, I think it actually goes back further than 36 hours. Rankersbo (talk) 07:55, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Baryayanga Andrew Aja
He is the member of parliament representing people of Kabale municipality. He is a mukiga by tribe. He recently took the IGG to court concerning procurement of Karuma hydro power project and won the case in the high court. He is known for his elaborate explanations on electricity in Uganda in parliament and national media.

He is married to Kembabazi Doreen with whom they have 2 daughters. New vision. Daily monitor, observer, Red pepper, the independent magazine,  NTV  WBS tv U tv. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.202.240.13 (talk) 09:09, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
 * This page is for users working on the project's administration. If you would like to submit an article or redirect, please use the article wizard. Hasteur (talk) 13:19, 21 October 2013 (UTC)