User talk:Equazcion/sandbox2/2013 18 10 October Oct

Wikiproject Articles for creation/Reviewer FAQ
A discussion above reminded me of this page that I started because of a discussion some time ago. No one has worked on it for some time, not even me. It can't be given a tab (or subtab) until it's in useful shape, but maybe there isn't enough interest in it. There are so many other things to do. Should I (1) request deletion, or (2) leave it in case someone wants to work on it later? &mdash;Anne Delong (talk) 14:10, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Many things have conspired against people filling this out. I took the liberty of dashing off some answers to the remaining outstanding questions.  I strongly suggest that others also take a crack the questions/answers. Hasteur (talk) 20:50, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
 * I've blanked the section on who can participate as the latest RfC shows a consensus that there must be standard for users to meet before they begin reviewing. Pol430   talk to me  16:49, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
 * I've undid the blanking because untill the new permissions/guidelines are in place, no guidelines at all is not helpful. We can edit to change the meaning, but blanking outright is not helpful. Hasteur (talk) 20:10, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Per Hasteur, until the criteria for persmission have been set by  the community (RfC coming  soon), I  agree that  any  previous or current  recommendations for experience should be kept. Thanks also  to  Hasteur for continuing  to  monitor  the additions to  the  list of participants. Let's not  lose sight  of the fact  that  the permissions system has two  clear objectives: To  ensure that  reviewers are applying  the same standards for review and editor  help, and to  prevent  more users from abusing  the system  in  order to  review their own submissions. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:53, 16 October 2013 (UTC)