User talk:Er-vet-en/Archive 7

alo
- bilo bi poželjno da prije nego iz čista mira makneš desetak kilobajta teksta koji stoji tu godinama da ono...diskutiraš o tome na strani za razgovor. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 12:21, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Zaletih se malo. Doduše, tema se obrađuje na postavljenoj smijernici, pa mi se toliki komad teksta učinio skroz irelevantnim uzevši u obzir ostatak članka. Ispričavam se.  Er-vet-en  (talk ) 12:28, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Pa sad - ja bih iskreno sa tog člaka o razlikama među suvremenim standardima maknuo sav povijesni kontekst i ostavio samo tablice sa razlikama i tekst koji ih objašnjuje (kao što je npr. na članku [[Differences between Norwegian Bokmål and Standard Danish]]). Cijela time odnosa i suvremenih hrv/bos/srp/crn standarda, i interpretacije "jezika" tijekom vremena je dovoljno kompleksna da bi se mogla izdvojiti u zaseban članak. Članak za razlike među standardima se uopće ne bi trebao paviti pitanjem i argumentima za različitost jezika, Jugoslavijom, vukovcima... već samo prezentirati današnje činjenično stanje sa gledišta standardologije. Ima tu dosta posla još za napraviti, ali najbolje je sve to uređivati malo-po-malo. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 12:39, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Serb Uskoks
An article that you have been involved in editing, Serb Uskoks, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. You didn't work on that page per say, but the Uskoci one. I thought you would be interested. Jesuislafete (talk) 21:45, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

Nice to know you
Hi Er-vet-en! I'm glad to see you give an hand in copy-editing the Veranzio/Vrancić. I'm also glad to see your approach is very collaborative. Despite what Direktor wrote I hope you agree my explanation about toponym. Direktor is an editor I respect, but often it seems that in his opinon every single a bit "Italian-shaped" name is a shame for Croatia history. I tried to explain him Croatia can claim an historical patrimony which can be considered as the best surrogate of different cultures. I hope we can collaborate closely and for a long time. For the moment, nice to know you!
 * Sincerely, --Theirrulez (talk) 12:57, 29 May 2010 (UTC)


 * I can confirm what I said here, watching around your work on other Dalmatian and Croatian pages. --Theirrulez (talk) 11:56, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. – xeno talk 18:37, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Teuta of Illyria
I've reviewed the article and placed it on hold, so you have seven days to further improve it. There are a few issues which are detailed on the review page, but generally it looks like it should pass the good article criteria with not too much more effort. Claritas § 19:50, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Kresimir.jpg
Hello. You said that File:Kresimir.jpg was taken from a history book. Can you please expand that to say which history book it came from. Thanks, Angus McLellan (Talk) 10:15, 28 September 2010 (UTC)


 * http://www.scribd.com/doc/26399764/Trpimir-Macan-Povijest-Hrvatskog-Naroda  Er-vet-en  ( say ) 10:21, 28 September 2010 (UTC)


 * This image will probably end up being deleted. Macan et al's Povijest Hrvatskoga Naroda is clearly still in copyright. It was only published in 1992. They don't seem to credit anyone else for this picture, so we'd have to assume it was first published there. So still copyrighted with the rest of the book. If it was a picture of something 2-dimensional (map, fresco, painting, manuscript), there would be no problem. A 2-d copy of a 2-d object gets tagged with PD-art and everyone is happy. But a seal is not a 2-dimensional object. We don't even consider coins to be 2-d. If you take a picture of Petar Kresimir's seal tomorrow, American law says you can copyright that.
 * If you want an image of the seal the only options seem to be (a) find a much older picture of the seal, (b) get someone to take one and upload it, (c) get someone skilled to draw it, or (d) do some wizard photoshopping on File:Odredba i potvrda kralja Petra Kresimira IV i pecat HDA 090609.jpg which shows the seal impression. Option (d) will be fastest - you could ask for help at Graphic Lab - and option (c) will produce the best results for such an old seal. Probably not what you want to hear, but that's the way things are. Best regards, Angus McLellan (Talk) 10:45, 28 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the elaboration. Will keep the above in mind for future reference.   Er-vet-en  ( say ) 10:48, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

COA of Kingdom of Croatia (medieval)
Hi Er-vet-en! I saw that you have changed the Croatian COA in mentioned article to Krešimir's seal, but I think it should be reverted it to chequy with crown since I found some references about the COA in that period. You can see my comments at talk page there. --Ro0103 22:35, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Ann Bolling Randolph Fitzhugh for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ann Bolling Randolph Fitzhugh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ann Bolling Randolph Fitzhugh until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. GcSwRhIc (talk) 12:22, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

More information needed about File:Prikazpavlasubica.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Prikazpavlasubica.jpg. However, it needs some more work before it is okay to use on Wikipedia.

Please click here and do the following:


 * 1) Add a description of where the image comes from (not what it is) and who the creator is. Please be specific, and include a link if you can.
 * 2) Find the appropriate license from the list of free, non-free media, or public domain options. Copy the license template and paste it in the file's page, and save.

If you follow these steps, your image can help enhance Wikipedia. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the media copyright questions page.

Thank you for your contribution! --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:06, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Subicmoney.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Subicmoney.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 01:12, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Rimac Concept One
How about expanding this article and nominating it for WP:DYK? I would like to collaborate on the expansion and nominate the article eventually - the deadline is Dec 18, that's Tuesday. GregorB (talk) 14:30, 16 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Go ahead. I'm currently busy so I won't be able to further contribute to the article for this and the following week.   Er-vet-en  ( say ) 14:47, 16 December 2012 (UTC)


 * No problem. If the article goes to DYK, it is going to be a shared credit. GregorB (talk) 21:25, 16 December 2012 (UTC)


 * The article is now selected for the main page - not sure when, looks like it's going to be Christmas Day. (See T:DYK/Q.) Thank you for creating it! GregorB (talk) 17:25, 21 December 2012 (UTC)


 * There were slight problems with the nomination, hopefully that's fixed now... GregorB (talk) 15:19, 23 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Hits the main page Sunday morning, apparently. GregorB (talk) 01:05, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Rimac Concept One
— Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:31, 6 January 2013 (UTC) 08:02, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Mazuranic2.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mazuranic2.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Dianna (talk) 01:23, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Paul Subic
I will write soon, if you want. --Norden1990 (talk) 22:47, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Coa-subic.png missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as: is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
 * File:Coa-subic.png

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 01:28, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Turkish Wikipedia
Zdravo! Uradio sam ono što si hteo. Nemam dovoljno vremena za Vikipediju danas. Trudim se da razvije članke o bivšoj Jugoslaviji. Hvala vam na predlogu. Prijatno veče. :) --Veritas-tr (talk) 23:47, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Revert
Before you do more damage, see this. All the authoritative sources date it to 926. May 27, 927 is the date Simeon died and a big confusion was born from an misinterpretation of Continuatus. José Luiz talk 20:09, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
 * And, while we're at it, can you provide a single source dating it to 927? José Luiz talk 20:10, 9 November 2013 (UTC)


 * No need, if what you state is true about all authoritative academic sources; feel free to change it back.  Er-vet-en  ( say ) 20:18, 9 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Ok. But please do check secondary sources (like those cited here). You're very welcome to help us sort it out since that contradiction appears on a lot of articles (see, for example, Byzantine–Bulgarian wars, where we can read "In 926, Simeon's troops invaded Croatia, at the time a Byzantine ally, but were severely defeated by the army of King Tomislav in the Battle of the Bosnian Highlands." (Runciman cited as the source), which used to link to a battle in 927. José Luiz talk 20:35, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
 * The only secondary sources that corroborate this I've found thus far are, in fact, Croatian (https://www.google.com/search?q=simeon+27+may+croatia&btnG=Search+Books&tbm=bks&tbo=1 -> which make it dubious for objective analysis). While I do believe we should keep this (926) year as the most accepted one, we should note the confusion and add the section which discusses dating of the event.   Er-vet-en  ( say ) 20:41, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Here is one of the sources mentioned by Constantine: John V.A. Fine, The Early Medieval Balkans: A Critical Survey from the Sixth to the Late Twelfth Century (1991), pg. 157. Laszlo Panaflex (talk) 00:03, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes, and here's Florin Curta: page 137. and apparently, Croatian historian Ferdo Šišić also states the battle happened in 926. I'm quite aware of all of that. I was referring to the 27 May date of 927 in the upper comment.   Er-vet-en  ( say ) 12:20, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Render new terminal Zagreb.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Render new terminal Zagreb.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:28, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Vicko Andrić (1793. - 1866.).jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Vicko Andrić (1793. - 1866.).jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION : This is an automated, BOT-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate your file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

File:UnityOfCommandIILogo.png
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:02, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:UnityOfCommandIILogo.png
Thanks for uploading File:UnityOfCommandIILogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:49, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Prikazpavlasubica.jpg


The file File:Prikazpavlasubica.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Croatia Rediviva has been accepted
 Croatia Rediviva, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!  DGG ( talk ) 05:06, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Croatia_Rediviva help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.