User talk:Er.sursa1991

Speedy deletion nomination of Bharatplaza
Hello Er.sursa1991,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Bharatplaza for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Terlob (talk) 07:04, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

September 2013
Hello, I'm Jusdafax. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Bharatplaza have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Allow me to add that removal of a speedy deletion tag, which the tag itself explicitly instructs you not to do, is a bad faith edit that can result in warnings, such as this one, or even a block of your ability to edit. Please do not remove the tag again, but instead follow the instructions if you wish to contest the speedy deletion nomination. Thanks. Jus da  fax   07:24, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, Jusdafax For your advice I will create my page in the sandbox. but I don't know how to create a page for the e-commerce website. Please help me.


 * The first thing you must do is stop removing the speedy deletion template. If you want to edit the article, as I see you did along with the speedy deletion template removal, that is ok. Read the template notification, and if you want to contest the speedy deletion then do so on the article talk page. Read our guidelines on notability requirements at WP:NOTE and the requirement for reliable sources at WP:RS and verifiability at WP:V. I make no decisions about these matters, merely on the obvious removal of the speedy deletion template twice, which does not help your case, to say the least. If the e-commerce website is notable and has references, then a case can be made for this article to exist. I hope this helps. Jus  da  fax   08:21, 21 September 2013 (UTC)