User talk:Erakura/Archives/2009/October

Re:
Yeah, I remember you. :) How are you doing?

Also, I applied a while ago and it got shot down primarily because of a comment I made off-Wiki, but I deserved it anyway. I don't really intend to have another shot at the mop at this time, but if prodded, I may at some point. Thanks for saying, anyway. :) — neuro  19:40, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I'll go and nibble at an admin ear, hopefully you'll get it sooner than later that way. — neuro  20:39, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Note
Hi, and thanks for agreeing to take the dispute mediation case at Mediation Cabal/Cases/2009-09-01/Jesse James. I just wanted to let you know that if Kasaalan continues to post snarky comments about his assumptions of me, I may end up not participating and instead go to WP:RfC or WP:AN/I. He's posted over 27Kb of comments already, a lot of which is simply regurgitating his comments that led to my dispute mediation request and has basically laid out the same points from before, repeating his attacks upon me, his assumptions about my educational background, and posted all of his proposals taken from the article talk page to which I refused to respond because mediation had been requested. I commented on him trying to direct how the mediation will occur. So now he claims I'm just wasting his time. As far as I'm concerned, about 90% of the issue is that English is not his first language, myself and 2 adminstrators have reverted what amounts to "non-improvement" because of that, and some sourcing issues, one of which includes not using a paraphrasing of a secondary source. So to the other editor, this means I've never heard of the source nor ever read it. I'd already essentially run out of patience with this person and in two days, it is close to that again. I will not respond to the page again until you've had an opportunity to look at the mediation page. You may regret having accepted this case, but thanks again. Wildhartlivie (talk) 22:48, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
 * You still haven't responded to the question and turning things around, which history books of Hobsbawm you have read before we had a debate. I might be wrong, it is easy for you to tell. Again you try to sugarcoat your wrong editing attitude with my bad grammar. Though my bad grammar does not justify your unnecessary reverts when I try to add facts, which based on historical references. You wasted my time during all these processes by not participating in proposals. You basically wrong over your claims in history, which I bothered to prove you by numerous WP:RS references. Yet you ignore them and avoid any debate over historical facts, while you always find time for personal debates over 1.5 months time. So I need editors to evaulate facts. If you have no intention on doing so, you should stop reverting me. You turn my edits into edit war, yet you avoid case by case historical debates all the time. As a non-expert in history, you revert all of my edits in an extremely BOLD way, while you don't back up your reverts with references better than mine. Since I don't claim any COI over you, how COIN will suppose to help anyway. Kasaalan (talk) 00:15, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

My apologies, Belinrahs. Wildhartlivie (talk) 03:22, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Jesse James
Hey Belinrahs, I see you redirected the participants in the Jesse James medcab case to COIN. I don't see a conflict of interest, am I missing something here?--Cúchullain t/ c 19:06, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Software development process
Huggle should have given you an indication that you were reverting a whitelisted editor when you made this edit. Your edit reverted to a rather jumbled article as you can see here. If you didn't get the Huggle warning you might consider reporting it as a glitch on the Huggle feedback page. Regards  Tide  rolls  03:37, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

vancouver gang deaths
regarding dilsher gill and joseph randays murders they were left in a grey mazda if you look on the vancouver sun, and cbc websites you'll find that they were found in a grey mazda not in an SUV —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.229.29.43 (talk) 03:48, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 05:48, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

advice about deletions
Please first read WP:Deletion policy, WP:BEFORE, and WP:COMMON, and only then start nominating articles for deletion. There are tens of thousands of impossibly bad articles that need it.  DGG ( talk ) 23:26, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

Occitan cuisine
Please, thank you for not moving the article Occitan cuisine, you're too fast. It's the beginning of a longuer article, as it may be a traduction of Cuina d'Occitània. I've told you in the discussion page.--Slastic (talk) 17:31, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

Need assistance
helpme Hey #wikipedia-en-help, I know I'm usually the one helping out there; I simply need comment and/or assistance on an issue. I tagged on Occitan cuisine -> Occitania..I'm not sure it merits it's own article. The author of the article replied to my edit directly above this. Anyone have any thoughts/actions they'd like to take? [Belinrahs|talktome⁄ ididit] 15:55, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Yo Belinrahs, I don't see any need for haste here. I suggest we let the author finish the article, and then see if there's consensus for merging. Skomorokh,  barbarian  16:03, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Per Skomorokh. Cancelling the template. Tim Song (talk) 22:13, 22 October 2009 (UTC)